Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MMX2010" data-source="post: 1079700" data-attributes="member: 8584">Journalists aren&#039;t lawyers.&nbsp; When they&#039;re interviewing lawyers, who by definition are supposed to know the law, it&#039;s a lawyer&#039;s responsibly to correct the journalist.&nbsp; Furthermore, the amount of human suffering that was caused because &quot;Tucker didn&#039;t know the law&quot; was negligible. &nbsp;You&#039;re moving the goalposts. You can credibly state that he didn&#039;t know the specific law, which I agree with - but don&#039;t think is damaging.&nbsp; But you can&#039;t possibly know that Tucker and his staff did absolutely no research . I don&#039;t think so. I think George Soros funding Black Lives Matter, ANTIFA, and other domestic activist groups is sleazy, petty, and reprehensible.&nbsp; It&#039;s well within Soros modus operandi to fund the legal defense of two guilty illegal immigrants.&nbsp; So Tucker was well within his right to imply that Soros was funding the defense, and the lawyer was well-within his right to dodge the question. A follow up, if you don&#039;t mind. I obviously can&#039;t read your mind, but I feel like your rage level over Tucker Carlson&#039;s behavior is an EIGHT out of TEN.&nbsp; What&#039;s your rage level over the way that Rockville, Maryland processes illegal immigrants (as revealed by Tucker&#039;s reporting)?&nbsp; How enraged are you that MS-13 members are placed in American schools?&nbsp; How enraged are you that illegal immigrants of age 21 are placed in schools with 13 and 14 year old girls?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MMX2010, post: 1079700, member: 8584"] Journalists aren't lawyers. When they're interviewing lawyers, who by definition are supposed to know the law, it's a lawyer's responsibly to correct the journalist. Furthermore, the amount of human suffering that was caused because "Tucker didn't know the law" was negligible. You're moving the goalposts. You can credibly state that he didn't know the specific law, which I agree with - but don't think is damaging. But you can't possibly know that Tucker and his staff did [i]absolutely no research [/i]. I don't think so. I think George Soros funding Black Lives Matter, ANTIFA, and other domestic activist groups is sleazy, petty, and reprehensible. It's well within Soros modus operandi to fund the legal defense of two guilty illegal immigrants. So Tucker was well within his right to imply that Soros was funding the defense, and the lawyer was well-within his right to dodge the question. A follow up, if you don't mind. I obviously can't read your mind, but I feel like your rage level over Tucker Carlson's behavior is an EIGHT out of TEN. What's your rage level over the way that Rockville, Maryland processes illegal immigrants (as revealed by Tucker's reporting)? How enraged are you that MS-13 members are placed in American schools? How enraged are you that illegal immigrants of age 21 are placed in schools with 13 and 14 year old girls? [/QUOTE]

Verification