reciproke said:In 2014. I've now made three posts about being that bizarre and bringing it up repeatedly. Is there actually a soviet agent school that teaches agents to repeat rhetorics until everyone believes it?Except for the inconvenient fact that Kolomoisky and other oligarchs have openly admitted to funding Azov and other nationalist battalions.
Not really, you're describing it too simplistically. Russia is a imperialist, not globalist.
Semantics, you whine about your Anglo-American Empire but fail to see the a different brand of the same phenomenon. Reason for this is probably because you are not living there and get your information from intellectual think tanks romanticizing their enemy's enemy.
No, I am from there. And yes, there is a difference.
You are continuing to play the game by their rules, rules that they can change as they desire. You will end up with the same sociopath mindset as our political caste if you don't already have it, to begin with.
Also heartily chuckle if you really think Russia is a stronghold against that. I've indicated enough that the same breed of Oligarchs is active there and you just continue your act. Face it, you're bonkers and probably not even getting paid for being it. At least prostitutes take money for their services.
Most of your points are just word games and nonsense.
Russia itself is a giant Moldavia. And unless Russia, Ukraine is still predominantly white since it doesn't forcefully incorporate independent Nations (like Chechnya) while playing the Self-Determination card for their own interest groups on i.e. Crimea. Have a check about the demographic developments and the Muslim population. Muh multicultural Empire, sure. It's just an iteration of Soviet Communist doctrine on top of the carcass of the Russian Empire.
Russia is still predominantly white, with 80% ethnic Russian population, so I don't know why you are denying that. Ukraine does forcibly incorporate other nations, like the Hungarians in the west, Romanians in part of the south, and of course Russians in the east.
The Muslim population that's mostly concentrated in a few regions that they are native to?
The last sentence is also nonsense, the tsarist Russian Empire was the greatest civilisation in Eastern Europe.
At the end of the day both Nations are borderline broken. But when it comes to development, it should be easy to pick a favorite. A multicultural, globalist, Eurasian Empire that works purely by force versus a free and independent European(!) nation trying to embrace their native culture. It's really a no brainer and always fascinating how people come with convoluted arguments against it.
Free to embrace gay rights, abortion, and become an open air brothel while trying to force a totally contrived artificial identity created by foreign powers to use for their convenience on others. Russia is also predominantly a European empire, since ethnic Russians are European racially and culturally. The amount of mental gymnastics the Ukrainian Azov types come up with to justify their delusions is really something.