Pfizer CEO on a microchiped pill that will track if it was taken, and will increase "compliance".
I absolutely detest the word "compliance" when used in the context of following doctor's "orders".
While obviously the plans are to eventually force everyone to take a "vaccine" in pill form, for now they're claiming this technology will be used for chronic illnesses and notifying insurance companies (which is incredibly sinister in itself - no forced "treatment", no insurance)
Pfizer CEO who made millions pushing COVID vaccines is now excited about a pill with a chip that sends signals to authorities that the pill has been ingested. These people are frightening monsters. Pfizer’s CEO spoke about a pill that ensures compliance at Davos this week. Pfizer CEO Albert...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Regarding medical care, I find it troubling that a distinction is not made between chronic and acute health issues. Chronic issues, primarily as a result of lifestyle (though sometimes it is genetics and out of the person's control) are the kinds of things that allopathic medicine as a whole is useless at best and harmful at worst.
Acute issues/bodily trauma is another story. While I generally avoid doctors and the allopathic system, I have to say that in the event of my family or myself being victims of an accident, gunshot/stabbing wound or similar imminent death then absolutely I would go to a hospital. To avoid a hospital in some cases is as much a death wish as it is to go to one in other cases. I suppose the argument could be made that if God didn't want us to be seriously wounded at risk lf dying then He would have kept us from harm, but my answer would be that He also allowed hospitals to exist to help in such scenarios. To each their own.
As for organ donating, while it seems noble to donate one's organs to help someone else survive, the situation is sketchy. I'll be vague to avoid doxxing but there is some truth to stories about relatives being pressured to donate their relative's organs and these people being left to die. Tip: if possible, avoid "teaching hospitals", where often times they literally are
practicing medicine.
Also, for what it's worth, I've noticed in the last few years that the liberal crowd has been heavily pushing organ/body donation. On a forum I used to lurk on the question got brought up and anyone who answered "no" was branded "selfish" or worse, and anyone who had firsthand knowledge of the shady behind the scenes practices and was sharing information was getting their posts deleted (after being attacked in the meantime).
Most donated bodies will not be used for organ transplants but instead used to practice on (both by medical students and random people that pay for the "experience", as some scandals have revealed), or worse, end up in body farms where the effects of decomposition under a variety of conditions are tested (sometimes without the donator's or their families' consent).
An organization that bought a human body and organized its public dissection says it had a contract saying it could be used for education, and its “Cadaver Lab Class” was appropriately educational, despite criticism from the man's widow. Death Science said it does not have any information about...
news.yahoo.com
A US centre was sued over its handling of donated bodies. What do we know about the industry?
www.bbc.com
I saw a despicable individual claim online that he/she/whatever plans on doing just that. Absolutely depraved.