Vasectomy?

[Moma]

the plan b pill kept me from having to continue relations with this dirty slut with a horrible personality. Thank you modern medicine! I dont know what i would have done if she got pregnant.

i think i would seriously consider a vasectomy after i have a couple kids

Did you actually slip her the morning after pill as Mixx said, in her breakfast or something? I'm curious to know..

 

[Tuthmosis]

LOL! Man, we're a bunch of dirty dogs. If Roosh gets a lot of shit from those cunts in the blogosphere, we'd get fucking crucified for this shit. Intentionally giving a girl an infection with dirty hands? Crushing a Plan B into her food or a tasty beverage? I want to give you guys Nobel Prizes for this shit, but these are some nuclear options. Hilarious.

The only problem is that I thought it was pretty hard to get Plan B pills without a chick present. Where do you guys get your supply? It seems a Plan B pill is worth its weight in condoms.

I guess you could bring a rogue bitch with you to the clinic as a shill, but I imagine that might create a messy paper trail.

 

[Gmac]

LOL! Man, we're a bunch of dirty dogs. If Roosh gets a lot of shit from those cunts in the blogosphere, we'd get fucking crucified for this shit. Intentionally giving a girl an infection with dirty hands? Crushing a Plan B into her food or a tasty beverage? I want to give you guys Nobel Prizes for this shit, but these are some nuclear options. Hilarious.

The only problem is that I thought it was pretty hard to get Plan B pills without a chick present. Where do you guys get your supply? It seems a Plan B pill is worth its weight in condoms.

I guess you could bring a rogue bitch with you to the clinic as a shill, but I imagine that might create a messy paper trail.

They are expensive but I have my pharmacy industry contacts, not worried about it. Not worried about the moral/ethical consequences either, more concerned with my own well-being.

 

[MiXX]

I forgot to mention that the Iphone app has a yellow light on a few days before she starts ovulating. So, it is just like a traffic light.

Red Light: Means "No Baby". No way she can get pregnant as she is not ovulating at all. THIS IS YOUR GOLDEN WINDOW TO FUCK RAWDOG AND CUM INSIDE HER IF YOU WISH!

Yellow Light: Means "Maybe Baby" -- Fuck raw at your own risk - she is very close to ovulating - you have a 50/50 shot. I don't raw dog my main girl at a yellow light.

Green Light: Means "Yes Baby" -- She is in full ovulating mode, and an egg has been released! If you decide to fuck a girl raw during a green light, congratulations daddy!

Mixx

 

[Gmac]

I forgot to mention that the Iphone app has a yellow light on a few days before she starts ovulating. So, it is just like a traffic light.

Red Light: Means "No Baby". No way she can get pregnant as she is not ovulating at all. THIS IS YOUR GOLDEN WINDOW TO FUCK RAWDOG AND CUM INSIDE HER IF YOU WISH!

Yellow Light: Means "Maybe Baby" -- Fuck raw at your own risk - she is very close to ovulating - you have a 50/50 shot. I don't raw dog my mail girl at a yellow light.

Green Light: Means "Yes Baby" -- If you decide to fuck a girl raw during a green light, congratulations daddy!

Mixx

There's no way I'd trust that app, cycles are known to be off a few days every now and then. I'm too fucking paranoid.

 

[hydrogonian]

I know that I'd fuck up the light system and that little app would propel me into fatherhood with startling efficiency

 

[MiXX]

There's no way I'd trust that app, cycles are known to be off a few days every now and then. I'm too fucking paranoid.

I doubt you are more paranoid about being a father than me brotha. I'd fucking die of a heart attack if a woman merely tells me she is a few days "late"....I got way too much to lose, and my freedom is priceless.

I can understand your paranoia, I also have it. This app has not led me wrong in 2 years...seriously. The 2/4 day offset you speak of is taken into consideration, and if her period comes at a different date than you expected, you can immediately change it on the app, and it will adjust itself again, and keep learning/adjusting the trend.

Mixx

 

[MiXX]

I know that I'd fuck up the light system and that little app would propel me into fatherhood with startling efficiency

They thought about this. Right below the light there are BIG BOLD WORDS "NO BABY" or "YES BABY" or "MAYBE BABY".

Mixx

 

[gringoed]

Mixx- This chick you're rawdogging who doesnt want to get pregnant should just go on the pill. Wouldn't that give you two far more peace of mind, especially considering that sperm can survive inside a woman for 5-7 days after sex?

http://www.justmommies.com/articles/how-long-do-sperm-live.shtml


As for Plan B, I see 3 major problems with relying on this.

1. Expense. Last time I bought it it costed $75.
2. A woman has to be present in order to purchase it. I doubt anyone will let you buy them in bulk.
3. Don't prevent STD's.

 

[Moma]

LOL! Man, we're a bunch of dirty dogs. If Roosh gets a lot of shit from those cunts in the blogosphere, we'd get fucking crucified for this shit. Intentionally giving a girl an infection with dirty hands? Crushing a Plan B into her food or a tasty beverage? I want to give you guys Nobel Prizes for this shit, but these are some nuclear options. Hilarious.

The only problem is that I thought it was pretty hard to get Plan B pills without a chick present. Where do you guys get your supply? It seems a Plan B pill is worth its weight in condoms.

I guess you could bring a rogue bitch with you to the clinic as a shill, but I imagine that might create a messy paper trail.

I see nothing wrong with sneaking the morning after pill into a woman's breakfast. It's unethical for a woman to force a man into parenthood. It's totally inconsiderate for his wishes as well as the wellbeing of the child.

Now the dirty vagina movement, that's questionable. But Mixx's approach, brilliant. Should charge 9.95 per head for that tidbit.

 

[gringoed]

I know that I'd fuck up the light system and that little app would propel me into fatherhood with startling efficiency

Someone on here should make a similar app except with the light colors switched. Green should = NO BABY.

If they could also have the app emit high levels of sperm-killing radiation they would be a millionaire.

 

[Moma]

Mixx- This chick you're rawdogging who doesnt want to get pregnant should just go on the pill. Wouldn't that give you two far more peace of mind, especially considering that sperm can survive inside a woman for 5-7 days after sex?

http://www.justmommies.com/articles/how-long-do-sperm-live.shtml


As for Plan B, I see 3 major problems with relying on this.

1. Expense. Last time I bought it it costed $75.
2. A woman has to be present in order to purchase it. I doubt anyone will let you buy them in bulk.
3. Don't prevent STD's.

This is not a thread about STD's though. The pill, vasectomies, even condoms won't prevent STD's.

This is about prevention of fatherhood.

 

[MiXX]

Mixx- This chick you're rawdogging who doesnt want to get pregnant should just go on the pill. Wouldn't that give you two far more peace of mind, especially considering that sperm can survive inside a woman for 5-7 days after sex?

http://www.justmommies.com/articles/how-long-do-sperm-live.shtml

Yeah, I told her this, but she often would forget to take the pill, and one day she forgets is enough to get pregnant. Also, she refuses to deal with the side effects of the 3 month birth control injection.

As for Plan B, I see 3 major problems with relying on this.

1. Expense. Last time I bought it it costed $75.

You'll be paying a lot more than $75 if she gets pregnant buddy!

2. A woman has to be present in order to purchase it. I doubt anyone will let you buy them in bulk.

Bring your sister, aunt, cousin, niece, stripper you met last night...and pay them off with a new pair of shoes.

3. Don't prevent STD's.

well, true...but again, we are talking about girls you decided to raw-dog knowing this risk. So, immaterial to your argument.


Mixx

 

[gringoed]

Mixx- This chick you're rawdogging who doesnt want to get pregnant should just go on the pill. Wouldn't that give you two far more peace of mind, especially considering that sperm can survive inside a woman for 5-7 days after sex?

http://www.justmommies.com/articles/how-long-do-sperm-live.shtml


As for Plan B, I see 3 major problems with relying on this.

1. Expense. Last time I bought it it costed $75.
2. A woman has to be present in order to purchase it. I doubt anyone will let you buy them in bulk.
3. Don't prevent STD's.

This is not a thread about STD's though. The pill, vasectomies, even condoms won't prevent STD's.

This is about prevention of fatherhood.

I agree, but shouldn't STD's be a factor in choosing contraception?

If contraception A was identical to contraception B, except that contraception B also prevented STD's. Which would you choose?

 

[MiXX]

I agree, but shouldn't STD's be a factor in choosing contraception?

If contraception A was identical to contraception B, except that contraception B also prevented STD's. Which would you choose?

But, we are not talking about contraception man. We are talking about being able to raw-dog a girl (accepting the risks of STD's with said girl), and preventing unwanted pregnancies as a result.

You want to have contraception that MAY prevent both STD's and pregnancy? Use condoms! You can still catch STD's with condoms like: Herpes, HPV, Syphilis because the condom does not fan out tor protect the skin at the base of you penis that rubs against the woman during intercourse.

And even then, you better pray it does not tear on you or slips off your penis and gets stuck in her vagina with all spermies leaking inside her, as I've had happen to me many times with condoms which leads me back to running to grab my morning after pills to begin with, and pray the girl is not HIV+ or anything else.



Mixx

 

[hydrogonian]

Now the dirty vagina movement, that's questionable. But Mixx's approach, brilliant. Should charge 9.95 per head for that tidbit.

I'm not saying that your wrong, but let me play devil's advocate here for a minute.

First, we're talking about two different sub-optimal situations that are being effected to the end of preventing pregnancy. Neither is good, as far as she is concerned.

1. A bacterial infection of the urinary tract

2. A pill-induced hormonal upheaval that aborts the pregnancy.

Neither is good. However, i would submit that the common UTI is less invasive than the hormonal manipulation. The UTI won't effect her body beyond that area. The hormonal change effects everything, including every organ, if only briefly.

Also, how much research has been done on the long term consequences of the morning after pill? And we're talking about administering it without consent. Lets say she were to 1. Get a UTI, which will never, ever be pinned on you. And it's more of an annoyance than anything. But let's say she finds out that you gave it to her 2. Get a blood test for some reason and the morning after pill were to be found in her system. If this were to go to a fictional court, and the judge were to be presented with both situations, which would he take a dimmer view of? Given that a UTI could ever be pinned on you, which it couldn't unless you were to admit to it. I would think that the pharmaceutical dosing would be much worse in the eyes of a judge and probably her. Girls get UTI's very commonly, and its actually just a risk with sexual interaction in general.

I'm not making a judgment or advocating either method, but just putting that perspective out there for the sake of argument.

 

[gringoed]

"But, we are not talking about contraception man. We are talking about being able to raw-dog a girl (accepting teh risks of STD's), and preventing unwanted pregnancies as a result."

This is a silly argument, but we ARE talking about contraception. Vasectomies (the title of the thread), Plan B, condoms, timing cycles, etc. These are all contraceptive methods.


On a different topic, when evaluating a birth control method they give you the effectiveness % (ie the % that it works). I've heard that the pull out method is 75% effective. Does that mean that every time you fuck a girl and pull out you still have a 1/4 chance of making her pregnant? Condoms are supposed to be 85% effective, but that would mean every 7 bangs with a rubber on would lead to conception. That can't be right...

 

[Moma]

Now the dirty vagina movement, that's questionable. But Mixx's approach, brilliant. Should charge 9.95 per head for that tidbit.

I'm not saying that your wrong, but let me play devil's advocate here for a minute.

First, we're talking about two different sub-optimal situations that are being effected to the end of preventing pregnancy. Neither is good, as far as she is concerned.

1. A bacterial infection of the urinary tract

2. A pill-induced hormonal upheaval that aborts the pregnancy.

Neither is good. However, i would submit that the common UTI is less invasive than the hormonal manipulation. The UTI won't effect her body beyond that area. The hormonal change effects everything, including every organ, if only briefly.

Also, how much research has been done on the long term consequences of the morning after pill? And we're talking about administering it without consent. Lets say she were to 1. Get a UTI, which will never, ever be pinned on you. And it's more of an annoyance than anything. But let's say she finds out that you gave it to her 2. Get a blood test for some reason and the morning after pill were to be found in her system. If this were to go to a fictional court, and the judge were to be presented with both situations, which would he take a dimmer view of? Given that a UTI could ever be pinned on you, which it couldn't unless you were to admit to it. I would think that the pharmaceutical dosing would be much worse in the eyes of a judge and probably her. Girls get UTI's very commonly.

I'm not making a judgment or advocating either method, but just putting that perspective out there for the sake of argument.

I agree that MAP may have long term effects that haven't been analysed but in terms of getting caught, how would she know that you spiked her lunch with MAP unless you blabber about your secret weapon?

And giving her the UTI, will playing with her vagina with dirty fingers GUARANTEE a UTI? What you play with her vagina with dirty fingers, she doesn't get a UTI..then what?

 

[MiXX]

"But, we are not talking about contraception man. We are talking about being able to raw-dog a girl (accepting teh risks of STD's), and preventing unwanted pregnancies as a result."

This is a silly argument, but we ARE talking about contraception. Vasectomies (the title of the thread), Plan B, condoms, timing cycles, etc. These are all contraceptive methods.


On a different topic, when evaluating a birth control method they give you the effectiveness % (ie the % that it works). I've heard that the pull out method is 75% effective. Does that mean that every time you fuck a girl and pull out you still have a 1/4 chance of making her pregnant? Condoms are supposed to be 85% effective, but that would mean every 7 bangs with a rubber on would lead to conception. That can't be right...

:dodgy:

I agree: this is a silly argument. Nobody on this forum has the 100% bulletproof method of contraception that still allows for physical, and pleasurable sexual penetration. Morning after works for me....and I accept the risks of STD's with SOME girls I trust, much like I accept the risks of getting behind a steering wheel of my car driving to/from work daily and driving to go clubbing on weekends when everyone is drinking and driving.


Mixx

 

[hydrogonian]

Now the dirty vagina movement, that's questionable. But Mixx's approach, brilliant. Should charge 9.95 per head for that tidbit.

I'm not saying that your wrong, but let me play devil's advocate here for a minute.

First, we're talking about two different sub-optimal situations that are being effected to the end of preventing pregnancy. Neither is good, as far as she is concerned.

1. A bacterial infection of the urinary tract

2. A pill-induced hormonal upheaval that aborts the pregnancy.

Neither is good. However, i would submit that the common UTI is less invasive than the hormonal manipulation. The UTI won't effect her body beyond that area. The hormonal change effects everything, including every organ, if only briefly.

Also, how much research has been done on the long term consequences of the morning after pill? And we're talking about administering it without consent. Lets say she were to 1. Get a UTI, which will never, ever be pinned on you. And it's more of an annoyance than anything. But let's say she finds out that you gave it to her 2. Get a blood test for some reason and the morning after pill were to be found in her system. If this were to go to a fictional court, and the judge were to be presented with both situations, which would he take a dimmer view of? Given that a UTI could ever be pinned on you, which it couldn't unless you were to admit to it. I would think that the pharmaceutical dosing would be much worse in the eyes of a judge and probably her. Girls get UTI's very commonly.

I'm not making a judgment or advocating either method, but just putting that perspective out there for the sake of argument.

I agree that MAP may have long term effects that haven't been analysed but in terms of getting caught, how would she know that you spiked her lunch with MAP unless you blabber about your secret weapon?

And giving her the UTI, will playing with her vagina with dirty fingers GUARANTEE a UTI? What you play with her vagina with dirty fingers, she doesn't get a UTI..then what?

Oh, I didn't say it was full-proof by any means. I presented it as a "quick and dirty" option when there are no others. Whether dosing with a morning after pill is a practical (do you have one?) or moral option, above the UTI method, is up to you.