Virginia Court Demands Dick Pic of Underage Minor

Status
Not open for further replies.

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
Ever wonder why we despise Jezebel and feminist writers? This is why.

Their articles about "rape culture" and their efforts to expand the definition of rape didn't have any direct influence on what these wacko officers want to do.

But they have set up a cultural climate in which it's possible and the government is making it happen.

We now live in an environment very similar to the "satanic panic" of the '80s. Except this time they're not going after "evil" daycare providers or heavy metal bands. They're coming for you and me.

Examples? Last week in the Washington Post, Alyssa Rosenberg wrote about Robin Thicke: "Singing “I gotta treat her right, I gotta cherish her for life,” or any variation thereof, is not proof of self-awareness or artistic insight. It is a massive cliche, and one with sometimes-deadly implications for the women who are urged by violent or emotionally abusive partners that this time it will be different."

Got that? There's a connection between a song and "violent or emotionally abusive partners." Just like there was a connection between devil worship and Judas Priest. This is how you create a moral panic and this is why law enforcement now seek to perform "Brave New World"-like medical procedures on teenage boys not yet convicted of a crime.

In the '70s people would streak and crowds would laugh. Now a dick pic is a felony. This is a major, major cultural shift and not a good one.

Buzzfeed has released the teenage boy's name, so I'll link to them and place it here, so it can be forever associated with Alyssa Rosenberg of the Washington Post.

His name is Trey Simms and decades from now, when this is all a nostalgic laugh, I'd like future generations to know it was Alyssa Rosenberg and writers like her who helped create a climate of anti-male sexual hysteria that made his life hell and caused law enforcement's overreach.

And to those who say "You're wrong! We're more sexually free than ever! There are sex-positive feminists!!" please be clear: this is the demonizing of *male* sexuality. The girl wasn't charged.

Once again, I'll repeat:

"The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality." -- Roissy
 

The Lizard of Oz

Crow
Gold Member
runsonmagic said:
I can't find the judges name anywhere. Shouldn't we be looking into his browser search history?

No. The point is not to expand the deranged "child porn" witch hunt but to showcase its evil and absurdity which this case makes so apparent.
 

Renzy

Pelican
Catholic
So his name has already been released, which means that thanks to Google he'll be associated with this...forever. On top of that if convicted he'll be required to register as a sex-offender. This kid's life could effectively be over before it even really got started.

This case reminded me of another one that was on the forum not too long ago- Christian Adamek, the teen who committed suicide after he got brought up on legal charges for streaking at a high school football game. He too faced being put on a sex-offender registry. He was 15 at the time of his death.

 

runsonmagic

Ostrich
The Lizard of Oz said:
runsonmagic said:
I can't find the judges name anywhere. Shouldn't we be looking into his browser search history?

No. The point is not to expand the deranged "child porn" witch hunt but to showcase its evil and absurdity which this case makes so apparent.

It's witchhunt aikido. Redirect the witchhunts energy back on the person who started it - in this case the judge ordering this nonsense.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
Meanwhile in Sacramento, cops are answering personal ads placed by men seeking women, then revealing late into the exchange they're "underage." Then they arrest the men. Reason reports on it today.

Yes, the idiot who placed the ad should have ended the correspondence as soon as the "girl" said she was underage. But why is the state creating crimes?

And if any law enforcement or feminists read this board, I'll ask why is the state creating crimes for men? Aren't we already overrepresented in prisons?

I ask because back in the Yahoo Messenger days, I had mindblowing cyber sex posing as an underage boy with a woman named Diane who worked for the federal government and liked 'em young.

I still have the nude pics she sent to the 17-year-old "me" and our instant message exchange is still in the Yahoo Messenger files in my old computer. The door they've opened swings both ways, so to speak.
 

runsonmagic

Ostrich
I remember having conversations with my friends at 17 about how weird it was that if we raped an older girl she'd be the one who went to jail.

Sending undgerage girls after your enemies is gonna be the CIA tactic of 2016
 

The Lizard of Oz

Crow
Gold Member
Excellent post, DoBA. Exactly.

You can add to this prostitution "stings" where some cops pose as prostitutes online and lure unsuspecting "johns" to rendez-vous where they are then "named and shamed". Some poor dude who just wanted to bust a nut for a modest price has to be lectured by a dyke about "trafficking" and have his picture appearing in the hometown paper for all to see.

This endless state entrapment and the nationwide industry of manufacturing crimes (all of them by men) is evil and despicable and has to stop. It is a shameful stain on our country's conscience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top