Vladimir Putin, freeing Russia from Rothschild's banking enslavement

Based

Sparrow
Apparently Putin learned to love the Jew from a very young age:

https://www.israel365news.com/55179...fe-worlds-most-powerful-leaders-jewish-world/

At the International Assembly of Chabad Representatives in 2007, Russia’s Chief Rabbi, Rabbi Berel Lazar, often referred to as “Putin’s Rabbi”, told a remarkable story about the Russian leader, which he heard from Putin himself.

“When he was a young child, he grew up in a very poor family. His parents were always out at work. He was fortunate that the next door neighbor was a Hasidic Jewish family, and they always made sure to invite him over,” Lazar explained. “They were extremely kind to him, and he realized that not only were they kind to a child that wasn’t theirs, not only were they kind to a child that wasn’t Jewish, but they were kind to a child in a time and place when it was dangerous to do that.”

FUCK IS THERE ANYONE IN POWER WHO DOESN’T KISS THE ASS OF THE JEW?
 
You don't believe in the possibility of a political continuator of Putin's work ?
Last year the Russian constitution was amended per referendum. As a result it is to be expected that this year will bring quite a few changes to Russia's political system.

The most important change will likely be the change from a Presidential system to a Parliamentary system.

In autumn 2021 there will be Duma elections. According to the amended Constitution the new elected majority state Duma will then form and approve a new government. It remains to be seen what this will mean in reality, but the framework is there.


In the case of Putin's succesión There are historical analogies, as political succession has always been a problem in Russia. In Tsarist times it was the lack of merit that eventually always became an issue. Succession in communist times doesn't need an explanation, Stalin wiped out all competent rivals and therefor only morons could apply.

Putin's leadership is mostly built around his persona. That's dangerous. It would be best if he started rooting a siloviki based Deep State with strong ties to the FSB, the LEAs and the Military. Vetted persons that are highly trained to root out moles. A strong tradition of patriotism. State led capitalism. Faux political parties to give the public the Illusion of choice. (although Putin is already doing many of these)

Putin was able to reassert Russian sovereignty from the foreign backed oligarchs. Not many were able to do what he did. Some of the stuff mentioned in this thread is laughable, it really is.

If Russia post-Putin allows financial power to dictate political power again it's over. It will be like the West, where politicians don't matter, only financial power behind the scenes does. The oligarchs with their dual British/Israeli citizenship and villas in Chelsea and Málaga have zero patriotism. It will be like the Yeltsin era but 10 times worse

As for a possible successor, (I personally don't believe in the Duma led system) MacDonald from RT mentioned Dmitry Patrushev. Patrushev has been the head of the Ministry of Agriculture for a couple of years now, where he has done tremendously (agricultural exports surpassed military exports last year). His dad is the head of the Security Council, he has FSB (siloviki) connections and he speaks fluent English.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Putin learned to love the Jew from a very young age:

https://www.israel365news.com/55179...fe-worlds-most-powerful-leaders-jewish-world/

At the International Assembly of Chabad Representatives in 2007, Russia’s Chief Rabbi, Rabbi Berel Lazar, often referred to as “Putin’s Rabbi”, told a remarkable story about the Russian leader, which he heard from Putin himself.

“When he was a young child, he grew up in a very poor family. His parents were always out at work. He was fortunate that the next door neighbor was a Hasidic Jewish family, and they always made sure to invite him over,” Lazar explained. “They were extremely kind to him, and he realized that not only were they kind to a child that wasn’t theirs, not only were they kind to a child that wasn’t Jewish, but they were kind to a child in a time and place when it was dangerous to do that.”

FUCK IS THERE ANYONE IN POWER WHO DOESN’T KISS THE ASS OF THE JEW?
Aren't people going a little overboard recently in their Jew hatred? Putin had a Jewish childhood friend and now he is forever darned?

The same man who rebuilt Russia from its ruins and gave the people their country, religion and pride back. The man who defeated the oligarchs (sending Berezovsky, Khodorkovsky (in) to exile/jail would be the same as sending Zuckerberg and Bezos to jail in the USA). The man who rebuilt the Russian economy from scratch, the man who reorganised the Army, the man who flushed out the press from anti-Russian foreign elements, the man who for years was one of the few leaders to fight the globalists..

.. Could go on for half an hour..

.. Is done because he had a Jewish childhood friend and not hostile towards the Russian-Jewish population per se..

Anyways, below is a list of names of celebrities /politicians etc. that were named after the failed Navalny psy-op as 'enemies of the state' by stalkerzone

Because Putin is such an Jewish asslicker (he has nothing against them though) that a significant part of that list has is Jewish. Again some people really need to calm down a bit



Evgeniya Abelyuk, philologist
Mikhail Aizenberg, poet
Lev Akopyan, musicologist
Ovanec Akopyan, historian
Boris Akunin, writer
Evgeny Aleksandrov, physicist, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Ekaterina Amerik, mathematician, Ph. D.
Vladimir Ananich, publisher
Aleksandr Anikin, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk
Aleksandr Belavin, physicist, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Anatoly Bely, Honoured Artist of the Russian Federation
Oleg Berezin, entrepreneur
Olga Bogomolova, chemist
Ekaterina Boikova, cartoonist
Galina Bondareva, teacher
Elizaveta Bonch-Osmolovskaya, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Nikolay Borisov, bioinformatician, Doctor of Technical Sciences
Lyubov Borusyak, sociologist, Candidate of Economic Sciences
Nina Braginskaya, philologist, antiquarian
Boris Brovtsyn, musician, professor at the Vienna Conservatory
Marina Buvailo, doctor, writer
Aleksandr Bufetov, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Steklov Institute of Mathematics
Elena Vanina, screenwriter, journalist
Vera Vasilyeva, journalist, editor
Dmitry Vedenyapin, poet
Aleksandr Venger, psychologist, Doctor of Psychological Sciences
Andrey Volna, doctor
Roman Volobuyev, director
Viktor Voronkov, sociologist
Ivan Vyrypayev, director
Irina Galkova, historian, Candidate of Historical Sciences
Sergey Gandlevsky, poet
Svetlana Gannushkina, Chairwoman of the “Civil Action Committee”
Evgeny Gindilis, producer
Georgy Gitelzon, biochemist, Candidate of Bio Sciences
Mikhail Glazov, physicist, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Anatoly Golubovsky, historian
Evgeny Gontmakher, Doctor of Economic Sciences
Viktor Gorbatov, philosopher
Varvara Gornostayeva, publisher
Nikolay Grintser, philologist, member of Russian Academy of Sciences
Lev Gudkov, Director of the “Levada Center”
Sergey Guriyev, an economist
Marina Davydova, Editor-in-chief of the “Teatr” magazine, Art Director of the NET festival
Nataliya Demina, science journalist
Andrey Desnitsky, Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Vitaly Dikson, writer
Sergey Dmitrenko, Orientalist, Candidate of Philology
Anton Dolin, film critic
Oleg Dorman, film director, screenwriter
Denis Dragunsky, writer
Olga Drobot, translator
Arkady Dubnov, journalist
Irina Eryomina, retired
George Efremov, poet, translator
Elena Zhemkova, human rights activist
Boris Zhuikov, Doctor of Chemical Sciences
Aleksey Zakharov, Economist and political scientist, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Vladimir Zakharov, physicist, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Andrey Zvyagintsev, director
Aleksandr Zeldovich, director
Dmitry Zimin, the founder of the company “VimpelCom” and the foundation “Dinastiya”
Mikhail Zygar, journalist, writer
Aleksey Ivanov, Geologist, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Nataliya Ivanova, writer
Askold Ivanchik, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, President of the Russian Association of Antique Historians
Ilya Indrupsky, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor
Aleksandr Kabanov, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Ph. D.
Andrey Kalinichev, Research Associate
Roman Kantor, screenwriter
Yuli Kim, poet, writer
Aleksandr Kirillov, Jr, mathematician, Ph. D.
Roman Kiselyov, human rights activist
Igor Klyamkin, political scientist, President of the “Liberal Mission Foundation”
Konstantin Knop, mathematician
Karine Kovkhayeva, librarian
Sergey Kozheurov, journalist
Maria Kolpakova, art critic
Natalya Konon, geneticist-breeder, factory owner
Vladimir Kostushev, sociologist, candidate of sociological sciences
Konstantin Kotov, civil activist
Vladimir Kott, director
Irina Kravtsova, editor
Mikhail Krasnov, Doctor of Law
Lika Kremer, journalist, producer
Zhora Kryzhovhikov, director
Yaroslav Kudryavtsev, physicist, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Ilya Kukulin, Cultural historian, Candidate of Philology
Evgeny Kunin, biologist, Academician of the US National Academy of Sciences
Sergey Kuok, journalist
Igor Kurlyandsky, historian, Candidate of Historical Sciences
Sergey Kuryshev, actor
Aleksandr Kynev, a political analyst
Irina Levontina, linguist, Candidate of Philology
Oleg Lekmanov, philologist
Yuliya Liderman, cultural critic, Candidate of Cultural Studies
Nina Litvinova, biologist, Candidate of Bio Sciences
Mikhail Lobanov, mathematician,” University Solidarity” trade union
Sergey Lukashevsky, Director of the Sakharov Center
Elena Lukyanova, lawyer, lecturer at the Free University
Natalia Mavlevich, writer
Mariya Maiofis, cultural historian, Candidate of Philology
Vitaly Mansky, director
Aleksey Maschan, pediatric hematologist/oncologist, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Mikhail Mestetsky, director
Nadiya Meshchankina, teacher, artist
Larisa Miller, writer
Vladimir Mirzoev, director
Sergey Mirkin, molecular biologist, Candidate of Bio Sciences
Grigory Mikhnov-Voitenko
Gleb Morev, historian, journalist
Dmitry Muratov, journalist
Olga Nazarenko, teacher
Anna Narinskaya, critic, curator
Irina Nasimova, physicist, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Leonid Nikitinsky, journalist
Sergey Nikitin and Tatiana Nikitina, author and performers of songs
Boris Nikolsky, philologist, Doctor of Philological Sciences
Maksim Osipov, writer, doctor
Aleksey Oskolsky, biologist, Doctor of Bio Sciences
Artemy Okhotin, doctor
Emil Pain, Doctor of Political Science
Aleksandr Pal, actor
Sergey Parkhomenko, journalist, radio presenter
Andrey Plakhov, film critic
Leonard Polishchuk, ecologist, Doctor of Bio Sciences
Aleksey Popogrebsky, director
Leonid Positselsky, mathematician, Ph. D. (Harvard University)
Faina Prendel, artist-restorer
Irina Prokhorova, publisher
Andrey Proshkin, director
Marina Razbezhkina, film director
Igor Razumov, Director of the “Liberal Mission” foundation
Zhanna Reznikova, biologist, Doctor of Bio Sciences
Nikolay Rekubratsky, researcher of the Institute of Freshwater Fisheries
Kirill Rogov, political analyst
Nikolay Rozanov, physicist, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Lev Rubinstein, writer
Nigina Sayfullayeva, Director
Andrey Sbarsky, Editor
Zoya Svetova, a journalist
Aleksey Semenov, Doctor of Biological Sciences
Vasily Sigarev, director
Sergey Skorbun, physicist
Veniamin Smekhov, actor
Yuliya Snigir, actress
Nikita Sokolov, historian, Candidate of Historical Sciences
Natalya Sotnikova, astronomer, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Irina Staf, translator
Mariya Stepanova, writer
Lyobov Summ, translator
Evgeny Syroechkovsky, Doctor of Biological Sciences
Oleg Sysuev, banker
Mikhail Tamm, physicist, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Yana Troyanova, actress
Fyodor Uspensky, philologist, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Gayane Farmazyan, art critic
Aleksey Fedorchenko, director
Mikhail Feigelman, physicist, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Aleksandr Filippenko, actor
Natalia Fichtenholz, teacher
Aleksandra Freidzon, chemist, Candidate of Chemical Sciences
Marina Friedman, a geneticist, Candidate of Bio Sciences
Efim Khazanov, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Chulpan Khamatova, actress
Boris Khlebnikov, director
Aleksandr Khokhlov, populariser of cosmonautics, member of the North-Western Organisation of the Russian Cosmonautics Federation
Andrey Tsaturyan, biophysicist, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Evgeny Tsyganov, actor
Aleksandr Chaplik, physicist, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Evgeny Shakhnovich, Ph. D., Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, biophysicist
Liliya Shevtsova, political analyst
Viktor Shenderovich, writer
Sergey Shishkin, biologist, Candidate of Bio Sciences
Zhanna Shlosberg-Kozlovich, doctor
Lev Shlosberg, Deputy of the Pskov Regional Assembly
Anna Smaina-Velikanova, theologian, Doctor of Culturology
Elena Shmeleva, linguist, Doctor of Philological Sciences
Sergey Shpilkin, analyst, technical translator
Boris Shtern, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Irina Shcherbakova, Historian, Candidate of Philological Sciences
Ilya Shchurov, mathematician, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
Iskander Yasaveyev, sociologist, Doctor of Social Sciences
 
Last edited:

First Soviet Government Was 80% Jewish, Says Putin

JTAJune 19, 2013

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.
“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.
Putin was referencing the library of Rabbi Joseph I. Schneerson, the late leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. The books, which are claimed by Chabad representatives in the United States, began being moved to the museum in Moscow this month.

First Soviet Government Was 80% Jewish, Says Putin by the Forward


According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.



----------------------------------------------​

Putin condemned for saying Jews may have manipulated U.S. election

Russian President Vladimir Putin speculated Saturday that nearly anyone could have disrupted the 2016 U.S. presidential election. (Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP)
By Avi Selk THE WASHINGTON POST March 11, 2018 at 12:25 p.m. EDT

Jewish groups and U.S. lawmakers condemned Russian President Vladimir Putin’s suggestion that the 2016 U.S. presidential election may have been manipulated by Russian Jews. Putin’s remarks came during a long and occasionally surreal interview with NBC News on Saturday, in which he speculated that nearly anyone other than the Russian government could have been behind a program to disrupt the election. U.S. intelligence agencies believe Putin ordered the effort to undermine faith in the U.S. election and help elect Donald Trump as president.

“Maybe they’re not even Russians,” Putin told Megyn Kelly, referring to who might have been behind the election interference. “Maybe they’re Ukrainian, Tatars, Jews — just with Russian citizenship.” He also speculated that France, Germany or “Asia” might have interfered in the election — or even Russians paid by the U.S. government.

But his remark about Jews, which seemed to suggest that a Russian Jew was not really a Russian, prompted particular outrage among those who remember Russia’s centuries-long history of anti-Semitism and Jewish purges. Some groups compared the statement to anti-Jewish myths that helped inspire the Holocaust.

“Repulsive Putin remark deserves to be denounced, soundly and promptly, by world leaders,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) wrote on Twitter. “Why is Trump silent?” Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) also demanded a response by Trump, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and Trump has previously been reluctant to criticize Putin or accept the intelligence community's conclusion that Russia played a role in his election.

“President Putin bizarrely has resorted to the blame game by pointing the finger at Jews and other minorities in his country,” Anti-Defamation League chief executive Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement. “It is deeply disturbing to see the Russian president giving new life to classic anti-Semitic stereotypes that have plagued his country for hundreds of years, with a comment that sounds as if it was ripped from the pages of the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion.’ ”

The American Jewish Committee also compared Putin’s comments to the “Elders of Zion
”.
There was a 10-15 year old video on YouTube of Putin stating that the communist revolution was a Jewish led project. In front of a batch of Hasidim Jews. He further stated that he doesn't blame then for anything but that it's the truth and the truth shouldn't be veiled

But I can't find it anymore. It was up until ~6 months ago. Perhaps you have seen this video and know where to find it?
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
The first article I've quoted was that precisely that event, couldn't find videos either...

There was a more recent video where Putin explicitly stated that there is a plan by globalists to destroy the family and reduce child birth, and that he was going to protect theRussian family, and bolster Russia's demographic health, much lie Orban is doing.
 
Last edited:

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Save for the last 10 minutes, I made it through all 3 parts "Russia is not great".

While the broad messages have a lot of merits; the conclusions drawn are not necessarily factually correct nor are they put in broad context. Contrary to the narrators' statements; much of the modern Russia's problems can be essentially boiled down to Yelstin's era, the period during which economic Holocaust the likes of which is without any precedent in history laid to waste the entirely country and the recovery of which is all but nearly staggering at biblical proportion. It's truly almost unfathomable to imagine. I am convinced that had Putin helmed Russia after the Soviet collapse, Russia might be prosperous, and yes, even a democratic country.

The highest rate of alcoholism is not surprising. Nor is the highest rate of abortions. These are to be expected in the aftermath of economic Holocaust and the resultant poverty and lack of economic opportunities. Although absurdly high alcoholic rate always has been a problem throughout Russia's history.

A quick research would suggest that adjusted for-and-given the socio-economic status of greater Russia; the abortion rate is comparable or even lower than that of USA where true economic deprivation cannot be claimed to be the driving force of abortion.

Now the criticisms of Putin's Russia with its handling of Islamic situation and the highest number of mosques per capita in the world are interesting and new to me. And the claims that Russia is not really attacking ISIS is new to me but then, it's plausible. I'm not sure what to make of these claims here.

With all that said; Russia is still a shithole. Sadly.

I only watched half of the first video, and there were so many lies and distortions I didn't bother watching the rest. That channel is run by a zionist anti-Russian liberal Romanian immigrant.

Take for example alcoholism in Russia: the rate of alcoholism and alcohol consumption has plummeted under Putin, due to specific policies as well as the restoration of the country's economic and social well-being. Russians today drink less alcohol per capita than France, Portugal or Germany. Not covering this basic fact at all shows the kind of distortion that channel does.

Russians' Alcohol Consumption Drops 80% in 7 Years

Mon, Dec 28 2020 | 440 words 3,091 Comments

MORE: Society Christianity Family Values From the Archives
Russia Insider

Alcohol consumption has been reduced by 80% over the past 5-7 years in Russia, Minister of Health Veronika Skvortsova stated at a working breakfast during the Gaidar Forum today, reports RIA-Novosti.
russia84804124.jpg


“We have managed to reduce the consumption of alcoholic beverages by 80% per capita…” Skvortsova stated. Meanwhile, “the number actively engaged in sports has grown by more than 40%.”
She also noted that smoking among adults has dropped 22%, and has been reduced thrice over among children and adolescents.
According to a 2012 report from the World Health Organization, the number of Russians who drink several times a week had by then declined to 5%, and the number who drink several times a month to 33%. Russian citizens were found to drink about as much as citizens of Denmark, Great Britain and Croatia.
The Russian Orthodox Church has played a key role in reducing the amount of alcohol consumption in the country. There are more than 500 active anti-alcoholism projects in Russia today under the auspices of the Church.
“One of the Church’s most successful works in the sphere of temperance education is the celebration of the All-Russian Day of Sobriety on September 11,” stated Valery Doronkin, head of the Coordinating Center for Combating Alcoholism and Endorsing Sobriety of the Synodal Charity Department.
Special prayers are added to the Litany of Peace and the Litany of Fervent Supplication on the Day of Sobriety. His Holiness Patriarch Kirill stated on this day in 2016:
By decision of the Holy Synod in 2014, the day of the Beheading of St. John the Prophet, Forerunner, and Baptist is deemed the Day of Sobriety, because precisely the mad state of Herod, drunk on wine at his banquet, was the cause of such a frightful order which he gave—to behead the holy prophet.
We know what terrible sufferings drunkenness has brought our people in the past, and which continue today: the destruction of families, the birth of sick children, people, losing the meaning of life and health, called to the fullness of existence, becoming invalids in youth only because they didn’t have enough strength to turn from sinful attractions and stop drinking.


Between 2003 and 2018, all-cause mortality dropped by 39% in men and by 36% in women, according to the report. The most substantial drops were observed in alcohol poisoning mortality, with a 73% decline in men and a 78% decline in women. Deaths from alcohol-related liver disease fell by 22% in men and by 24% in women. It also added that mortality from suicides dropped by 62% in men and by 61% in women.

The WHO credits Russian president Vladimir Putin for initiatives such as “restrictions on alcohol sales & promotion of healthy lifestyles, as well as excises on wine, beer and spirits.
 

Eusebius Erasmus

Woodpecker
You don't believe in the possibility of a political continuator of Putin's work ?
No.

Strong men who groom successors go for weaker men, since strong men don’t like threats to their power while alive. This is smart, but undermines their project.

It doesn’t seem like Putin is grooming a successor anyway.
 

Eusebius Erasmus

Woodpecker
I should add that I'm optimistic about Russia, but only because it is experiencing an Orthodox revival under Putin.

At the end of the day, the only thing that matters for us is union with Christ.

However, we must remain vigilant. We have to pray that Putin's successor, and Putin himself, do not fall prey to globalist forces.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Putin Blasts World Economic Forum Honchos at Davos Gabfest
Mike Whitney • March 2, 2021



Why is Vladimir Putin standing up to the richest and most powerful men in the world? Why is he bad-mouthing their “pet project” Globalization and trash-talking their “Great Reset”? Does he really think these corporate mandarins and “silver spoon” elites are going to listen to what he has to say or does he realize that they’re just going to hate him more than ever? Why is he doing this?
Here’s what’s going on: At the end of January, Putin was given the opportunity to address the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland (online). The WEF is a prestigious assembly of political leaders, corporatists and billionaire elites many of who are directly involved in the massive global restructuring project that is currently underway behind the smokescreen of the Covid-19 pandemic. Powerful members of the WEF decided that the Coronavirus presented the perfect opportunity to implement their dystopian strategy which includes a hasty transition to green energy, A.I., robotics, transhumanism, universal vaccination and a comprehensive surveillance matrix that detects the location and activities of every human being on the planet. The proponents of this universal police state breezily refer to it as “The Great Reset” which is the latest make-over of the more familiar, “New World Order”. There’s not a hairsbreadth difference between the Reset and one-world government which has preoccupied billionaire activists for more than a century. This is the group to which Putin made the following remarks:

“I would like to speak in more detail about the main challenges ..the international community is facing…. The first one is socioeconomic….. Starting from 1980, global per capita GDP has doubled in terms of real purchasing power parity. This is definitely a positive indicator. Globalisation and domestic growth have led to strong growth in developing countries and lifted over a billion people out of poverty….Still, the main question… is what was the nature of this global growth and who benefitted from it most…..
… developing countries benefitted a lot from the growing demand for their traditional and even new products. However, this integration into the global economy has resulted in more than just new jobs or greater export earnings. It also had its social costs, including a significant gap in individual incomes…. According to the World Bank, 3.6 million people subsisted on incomes of under $5.50 per day in the United States in 2000, but in 2016 this number grew to 5.6 million people....
Meanwhile, globalisation led to a significant increase in the revenue of large multinational, primarily US and European, companies…In terms of corporate profits, who got hold of the revenue? The answer is clear: one percent of the population.
And what has happened in the lives of other people? In the past 30 years, in a number of developed countries, the real incomes of over half of the citizens have been stagnating, not growing. Meanwhile, the cost of education and healthcare services has gone up. Do you know by how much? Three times…
In other words, millions of people even in wealthy countries have stopped hoping for an increase of their incomes. In the meantime, they are faced with the problem of how to keep themselves and their parents healthy and how to provide their children with a decent education….
These imbalances in global socioeconomic development are a direct result of the policy pursued in the 1980s, which was often vulgar or dogmatic. This policy rested on the so-called Washington Consensus with its unwritten rules, when the priority was given to the economic growth based on a private debt in conditions of deregulation and low taxes on the wealthy and the corporations….
As I have already mentioned, the coronavirus pandemic has only exacerbated these problems. In the last year, the global economy sustained its biggest decline since WWII. By July, the labour market had lost almost 500 million jobs…. In the first nine months of the past year alone, the losses of earnings amounted to $3.5 trillion. This figure is going up and, hence, social tension is on the rise.” (“Session of Davos Agenda 2021Online Forum, Putin Addresses World Economic Forum, Jan 27, 2021)
Why is Putin telling his elitist audience these things? Does he think these fatcats don’t know how the system works or how it was originally set up? Does he think they are unaware of the glaring flaws in a system that shifts all of the profits to obscenely wealthy corporations and scheming elites while working people slip further into debt and desperation?
Putin knows how globalisation works, just as he knows who it was designed to benefit. It’s no secret. Check out this quote from the Russian president in a speech nearly 5 years ago:

“Back in the late 1980s-early 1990s, there was a chance not just to accelerate the globalization process but also to give it a different quality and make it more harmonious and sustainable in nature. But some countries that saw themselves as victors in the Cold War, not just saw themselves this way but said it openly, took the course of simply reshaping the global political and economic order to fit their own interests.
In their euphoria, they essentially abandoned substantive and equal dialogue with other actors in international life, chose not to improve or create universal institutions, and attempted instead to bring the entire world under the spread of their own organizations, norms and rules. They chose the road of globalization and security for their own beloved selves, for the select few, but not for everyone.” (President Vladimir Putin, Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club)
Putin has followed developments in global trade for over 20 years. He knows the system is rigged and he knows who rigged it. And now he’s telling them in no uncertain terms that they are responsible for the mess the world is in today. “The world is in crisis, because you fu**ed up.” That’s what he’s saying. It’s not a subtle message, he’s simply laying it on the line. Check out this blurb from an earlier speech by Putin where he shows that he’s not just a capable leader but also an astute critic of social trends linked to globalization:
“It seems like elites don’t see the deepening stratification in society and the erosion of the middle class…(but the situation) creates a climate of uncertainty that has a direct impact on the public mood. Sociological studies conducted around the world show that people in different countries and on different continents tend to see the future as murky and bleak. This is sad. The future does not entice them, but frightens them. At the same time, people see no real opportunities or means for changing anything, influencing events and shaping policy. As for the claim that the fringe and populists have defeated the sensible, sober and responsible minority – we are not talking about populists or anything like that but about ordinary people, ordinary citizens who are losing trust in the ruling class. That is the problem…. ” (President Vladimir Putin, Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club)
In this one brief comment, Putin shows that he has a better grasp of ‘what is going on’ in the west than any of the numbskulls in congress today. And notice how he ignores the hype about “racial justice”, BLM, “white supremacy” and the other “racialized” bunkum that’s propagated in the media today. He’s not hoodwinked by that nonsense. He knows it’s just another diversion promoted by the cadres of dirtbags who use race and identity politics to conceal their role in the ongoing class war. That’s what’s really going on. The men that Putin is addressing in his speech are the very same men who are doing everything in their power to eviscerate democracy, skewer the middle class and grind America’s working population into dust. It’s plain old class war dolled-up to look like racial unrest. Here’s more from Putin:
“…During the past 20 years we have created a foundation for the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution (AKA–“The Great Reset”) based on the wide use of AI and automation and robotics. The coronavirus pandemic has greatly accelerated such projects and their implementation. However, this process is leading to new structural changes, I am thinking in particular of the labor market. This means that very many people could lose their jobs unless the state takes effective measures to prevent this. Most of these people are from the so-called middle class, which is the basis of any modern society.
…. The rise of economic problems and inequality is splitting society, triggering social, racial and ethnic intolerance. Indicatively, these tensions are bursting out even in the countries with seemingly civil and democratic institutions that are designed to alleviate and stop such phenomena and excesses.
The systemic socioeconomic problems are evoking such social discontent that they require special attention and real solutions. The dangerous illusion that they may be ignored or pushed into the corner is fraught with serious consequences.” (Putin, WEF)
Putin understands that the Covid-related lockdowns and closing of “non-essential” businesses is merely prelude for the massive societal restructuring project elites have in store for us. They’ve already put millions of people out of work and expanded their surveillance capabilities in anticipation of the social unrest they are deliberately inciting. Putin thinks this futuristic strategy is unnecessarily reckless, disruptive and fails to account for intensifying social animosities and widening political divisions that are bound to have a catastrophic impact on democratic institutions. But Putin also knows that his appeal for a more cautious approach will be brushed aside by the billionaire powerbrokers who set the policy and call the shots.

This is a recurrent theme with Putin and one that shows that he has a deeper understanding of what is really happening in both the United States and Europe than any of his peers. Populist candidates, like Trump, have not gained momentum due to thier abilities and charisma, but because the financial situation of millions of Americans continues to deteriorate forcing them to seek remedies outside the establishment candidates. The economic distress is real and widespread and, as Putin notes, it is expressing itself in outbursts of discontent, frustration and rage. Here’s more:

“Calls for inclusive growth and for creating decent standards of living for everyone are regularly made at various international forums. This is how it should be, and this is an absolutely correct view of our joint efforts.
It is clear that the world cannot continue creating an economy that will only benefit a million people, or even the golden billion. This is a destructive precept. This model is unbalanced by default. The recent developments, including migration crises, have reaffirmed this once again.” (Putin, WEF)
Putin’s recommendations, of course, are going to be dismissed with a wave of the hand by the men in power. The last thing these sociopaths want is “inclusive growth.. and decent standards of living for everyone.” That’s not even on their list, and why would it be. After all, they know what they want. “They want more for themselves and less for everyone else.” (George Carlin) Which is why the system works the way it does, because it was constructed with that one solitary goal in mind.
Putin also acknowledges the need for greater state intervention in the economy to counterbalance the more destructive effects of “smash and grab” capitalism. And, while he rejects the swift and far-reaching structural changes (The Great Reset) that would precipitate massive social upheaval, he does support a larger role for the state in providing essential fiscal stimulus, employment and a more equitable distribution of the wealth. This does not imply that Putin supports state socialism. He does not. He merely supports a more regulated and benign form of Capitalism that veers from the “scorched earth” model backed by powerful members of the WEF and other elitist organizations.
With that in mind, Putin makes these specific recommendations:
“We must now proceed from stating facts to action, investing our efforts and resources into reducing social inequality in individual countries and into gradually balancing the economic development standards of different countries and regions in the world. This would put an end to migration crises.”
The focus of this policy aimed at ensuring sustainable and harmonious development are clear. They imply the creation of new opportunities for everyone, conditions under which everyone will be able to develop and realize their potential regardless of where they were born and are living
I would like to point out four key priorities, as I see them.
First, everyone must have comfortable living conditions, including housing and affordable transport, energy and public utility infrastructure. Plus, environmental welfare, something that must not be overlooked.
Second, everyone must be sure that they will have a job that can ensure sustainable growth of income and, hence, decent standards of living. Everyone must have access to an effective system of lifelong education, which is absolutely indispensable now and which will allow people to develop, make a career and receive a decent pension and social benefits upon retirement.
Third, people must be confident that they will receive high-quality and effective medical care whenever necessary, and that the national healthcare system will guarantee access to modern medical services.
Fourth, regardless of the family income, children must be able to receive a decent education and realize their potential. Every child has potential.” (Putin, Davos)
What does it mean that the current president of Russia is now throwing his weight behind a program that is nearly identical to Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s economic Bill of Rights? Doesn’t that seem a bit odd? After all, Putin is a devout Orthodox Christian, a strong proponent of the traditional family, a self-avowed social conservative, and a hardscrabble survivor of the failed Soviet state. Who would have thought that such a man would support a program that provides a decent standard living to every member of society regardless of their circumstances?
But it makes sense, doesn’t it? Putin is pushing for a return to the heavily-regulated “Heyday” of 20th Century capitalism, when workers’ wages were still on the rise, when college tuition and health care were still affordable, and when the American Dream was still within reach of the average guy. People were happier then, because they felt that if they applied themselves, worked like hell, and stashed their savings in the bank; they’d eventually reach their goal. But that’s not true anymore. People are much more pessimistic now and no longer believe that America is the land of opportunity.
Putin wants to rekindle that optimism. He wants to avoid social unrest by implementing programs that provide a more equitable distribution of the wealth. This isn’t a return to Communism. It’s sensible way to soften the harsher effects of unrestrained capitalism, which is presently ravaging the West. Here’s Putin again:

“This is the only way to guarantee the cost-effective development of the modern economy, in which people are perceived as the end, rather than the means…. A strategy, also being implemented by my country, hinges on precisely these approaches. Our priorities revolve around people, their families, and they aim to ensure demographic development, to protect the people, to improve their well-being and to protect their health. We are now working to create favourable conditions for worthy and cost-effective work and successful entrepreneurship and to ensure digital transformation as the foundation of a high-tech future for the entire country, rather than that of a narrow group of companies.
We intend to focus the efforts of the state, the business community and civil society on these tasks and to implement a budgetary policy with the relevant incentives in the years ahead….” (Putin, Davos)
Imagine a political leader who actually put the needs and well-being of his people before the special interests of his deep-pocket donors and shady corporate buddies. Imagine a leader who stood eye-to-eye with the big money guys and told them that their system “sucked” and that they were taking too much for themselves leaving nothing for anyone else. Imagine a leader who invited more criticism, hectoring, demonizing and punitive sanctions for “speaking truth to power” in order to stand on the side of ordinary working people, pensioners, cast-offs and the other victims of this globalist rip-off system.
The reason Putin spoke out at the WEF confab and put himself at risk, was because Putin is one of the “good guys” who actually believes that everyone deserves a shot at a decent life. And that’s what sets Putin apart from the other leaders in the world today. He doesn’t just “talk the talk”, he also “walks the walk.”
 
Top