Charles Martel
Robin
Unfortunately, I am catching a plane and don't have time to comment on this myself.
Have fun, Gents!
Have fun, Gents!
#wastehistime2016 - Women continue to stoop lower
- Thread starter Mark Fletcher
- Start date
- Status
Tigre said:
If you're looking it from a guy's perspective, it may appear to be satirical, but we have to avoid our normalcy bias and think about it from the people who are writing these tweets- the women.
They may go along with the notion that this is really a satirical campaign, but that comes down to a woman's two favorite words: plausible deniability. They want to inflict pain on men, then when they're called out on it they can blame it on men while making themselves out to be victims.
When you read the tweets, and really think about it, it doesn't make much sense for them to be satire. The kind of shit they're talking about doesn't sound like the kind of stuff your typical 'fuckboy' would do. Some examples:
A player advertising scarcity?
Would a player spend time and energy on a chick without banging her, just to toy with her emotionally?
Plausible, but would a player just looking for the bang be texting a girl that much?
Most men I've met are just trying to get in and get out without wasting too much time or feeling the need to inflict unnecessary pain. But if you go back and read them again, they do sound like the kind of stuff that would hurt your typical thirsty guy. They're the ones who would text a girl if she was asking for attention, who would text a girl everyday without any expectation of escalation, and who would get hurt when a woman shoots them down. One of the quotes couldn't possibly apply if the roles were reversed:
Another thing that makes me think this isn't satire is the general tone of deep anger. It doesn't sound like something that's trying to be that funny. There is real resentment just below the surface and they want to lash out at someone.
They should be looking in the mirror to figure out why this is happening in the first place. If every man they're going after doesn't want them after they pull out, maybe there's something wrong with themselves, or maybe they're going after the wrong kind of guys. Ultimately they have to decide that something is either wrong with themselves, or something is wrong with every guy they've slept with. They're so narcissistic that they decide it couldn't be them, it must be all men everywhere.
So they seek to inflict misery on men. Ironically, by carrying out this campaign, they'll be alienating the only subset of guys desperate enough to put up with their atrocious behavior. A player wouldn't waste his time on it and would be chasing other girls anyway. A thirsty guy would be hurt, and either face the music with women, or try to do mental gymnastics to explain it away, only encouraging more of it. Vicious cycle.
Yeah, this is more about attacking the (beta type) men who DON'T pull the shit they're whining about for the transgressions of the alphas they're giving it up to. Still fucking the alphas, though. Classic displacement. So the alphas continue to laugh and get laid, the women's hamsters get a good workout, and the AFCs get closer and closer to being Elliot Rodgers all over again.
thoughtgypsy said:
Actually once I was clued into the satire part, I immediately recognized male player strategies.
- Come into the group through the most approachable girl, demonstrate value, then trade up to the hotter girl in group.
- One of the RVF guys putting up the highest numbers in Colombia was operating on a "message every lead every day" strategy.
Not trying to single you out here, thoughgypsy. I just thought the standard of comments on this whole thread was mediocre.
Most of it strikes me as the male equivalent to your random Jezebel commenter saying "shitlord Jonathan Swift wants to practice cannibalism on human babies!!!1!"
White knight is a faggot but he's most certainly right that the women posting in this hashtag aren't doing it to "flaunt superiority over men". It's painfully obvious that this hashtag is full of passive-aggressive rage from women spurned by alphas (or worse, spurned by even betas who wouldn't have them).
It's an obvious attempt at satire, and just as obviously fails at actually being satire because these posts are absolutely seething with butthurt and false bravado meant to conceal the pain of rejection.
The mistake here is taking her girlspeak account of the relationship at face value. What she imagined as "flirting with her a lot" could very well have been nothing. Women always embellish their stories heavily, especially when they are fishing for sympathy or emotional support.
Matsufubu said:
I don't think so. They are angry at the alpha men who spurned them, and since those alphas are inaccessible they are spewing it on twitter to anyone who will will pay them any attention. Their audience is whoever will listen and give them emotional support.
thoughtgypsy said:
Right, it's not satire, but they imagine it to be.
Yes, they should. But to me, these don't look like the kind of women interested in self-reflection.
Yes, but bear in mind that to them, "men" means the kind of men who rejected them. The betas you are talking about simply aren't worth their energy. They don't exist in their world, in the same way that a pudgy, ugly girl doesn't exist in yours.
They do not care about alienating the unattractive men in the same way that you would not care about alienating unattractive women.
Yes true but this is all way beyond what any of them are actually thinking about. They are simply imaging a world where they can reject and inflict pain on alpha men in the way that alphas have (probably inadvertently) caused them to feel pain. It's pure fantasy. It's not an admirable behavior by any means, but it's also not worth getting too worked up about.
Blaster said:
Outstanding summary and post.
I quickly skimmed some of their twitter accounts and noticed an unsurprising pattern of mediocre hipsters, young single moms, wall-approaching single moms.
In other words, a bunch of 6s who if they were less slutty and more pleasant would have at least a shot at a desirable male. Instead, they double down on the whoring and being a cunt.
Regarding the "satire", it's a classic move, especially by women. They'll give you shit, and when you respond they'll say "I'm just kidding, why are you so sensitive". A woman (who has her moments of decency) in my extended social circle does this. I always respond "You're not kidding, don't talk shit to me. And if you do, I shall respond in kind". This is going to surprise everyone, she's a post-wall 38 y/o alpha widow who can't compete with younger, hotter and more pleasant women.
Silvestroyer
Sparrow
AnonymousBosch said:John Michael Kane said:
Why do you think they're consistently portrayed as evil characters throughout folklore cross-culturally? People noticed the pattern.
You can tell Disney is under SJW control when they start reimagining fairy tales by making the heroine of a fairy tale the Antagonist and trying to 'justify' her evil actions.
This is a great point, and needs to be fully appreciated.
I've thought for a while now that the "witchcraft persecutions" of old Europe had some social cause behind them which is traceable to the disproportionate number of old women in parts of Germany and Northern Europe.
Decades of warfare had resulted in an imbalance of women over the number of men.
And there may--just may--have been a public outburst of hostility to the scheming, games, manipulations, and mischief being caused by bitter, alienated old women.
You'll never find this theory discussed, of course. But there may be something to it.
The book Malleus Maleficarum didn't just come from nowhere. It had some reason for its existence and popularity.
For those who don't know, the Malleus was a manual for the arrest, examination, torture, and prosecution of witches.
These are dangerous thoughts, to be sure, but perhaps worth thinking about.
- Status