- Men who don't wear collared shirts
all the time - red flag
.
- Women who don't wear heels
all the time - red flag
.
...
Seems like a straight-up aversion to peasants/working-class people who don't buy into consumer identity/aesthetics and status-signaling.
Counterproductive preferences, seems out-of-touch, considering what most people here claim to want in a spouse.
My husband has a couple pairs of slacks and a few nicer button-down shirts that are appropriate for church, weddings, funerals, etc. - as every man ought to - but 95%+ of his wardrobe is suitable for dirty/manual labor and outdoor living (basic t-shirts, rugged pants, some jeans, plaid cotton button-downs for layering/warmth).
I can't think of a single man I've ever known who "only" wears collared shirts, who would be qualified to lead me in any kind of life I'd want to live. "Cubicle-dweller skills" are
worthless to me, so a man dressing like a cubicle-dweller is a major red-flag. Soft hands on a man is another huge red flag. What do you even DO with your time if you don't have at least
some callouses? Is buttoning your shirt and tying your tie the hardest physical thing you do every day? Do you even shine your own shoes????
I've had too many "men" end up
looking to me to "do something" in times of... even quite mild hardship/inconvenience/danger. IT DOESN'T WORK. If you are "softer," more averse to hard labor, and less suited to living in primitive conditions than a small woman... sorry... looking
pretty and well-dressed doesn't compensate.
Ladies: if a man looks at you in wonder and appreciation because you were able to step up and do what SHOULD HAVE BEEN the man's job, where he proved ignorant or incapable...
you should not feel "appreciated." You should be gravely concerned.
Beware of pretty boys who have been trained up to adhere to corporate aesthetics. They'll promise you a life where
neither of you has to do the dirty work.
This means they are planning to not know HOW.