Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Boone947" data-source="post: 1569454" data-attributes="member: 24584">Excuse me! Isn’t the same priest (Fr. Damick) who wrote the article himself a person who shills the Vax and a&nbsp; purveyor of false information about the Coronavirus? Didn’t he recently sack an abbot from Ancient Faith radio for criticizing the Jab and the official narrative? I know nothing about Fr. Damick beyond what Orthodox posters on this forum have said about him; that he hosted a pro-choice woman author at Ancient Faith Radio ; he&nbsp; “presents obscure theories as fact” ; he “flirt with the occult and gnostic ideas” ; he&nbsp; is a marketer (“Fr Damick is a marketer. I think in marketing there is an incentive to spin to give ones organization the best image possible. Sort of like what lawyers do”) ; he has a “lack of knowledge in ecclesiology” ; he “represents a watered-down, wishy-washy, ecumenist type of Orthodoxy that is anathema to what the Saints and elders from past and present have always taught” ; is an example of “terminally self-indulgent hipster e-clergy” who “has zero business casting any public criticism about anyone” ; etc. etc. etc. Said one Orthodox poster on this forum, bluntly:&nbsp; “I don’t trust Fr. Damick”.&nbsp; But we can trust that what he writes critically about Catholicism is 100% factual and totally not full of misrepresentions and distortions — right? Odd.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Boone947, post: 1569454, member: 24584"] Excuse me! Isn’t the same priest (Fr. Damick) who wrote the article [U]himself[/U] a person who shills the Vax and a purveyor of false information about the Coronavirus? Didn’t he recently sack an abbot from Ancient Faith radio for criticizing the Jab and the official narrative? I know nothing about Fr. Damick beyond what Orthodox posters on this forum have said about him; that he hosted a pro-choice woman author at Ancient Faith Radio ; he “presents obscure theories as fact” ; he “flirt with the occult and gnostic ideas” ; he is a marketer (“Fr Damick is a marketer. I think in marketing there is an incentive to spin to give ones organization the best image possible. Sort of like what lawyers do”) ; he has a “lack of knowledge in ecclesiology” ; he “represents a watered-down, wishy-washy, ecumenist type of Orthodoxy that is anathema to what the Saints and elders from past and present have always taught” ; is an example of “terminally self-indulgent hipster e-clergy” who “has zero business casting any public criticism about anyone” ; etc. etc. etc. Said one Orthodox poster on this forum, bluntly: “I don’t trust Fr. Damick”. But we can trust that what he writes critically about Catholicism is 100% factual and totally not full of misrepresentions and distortions — right? Odd. [/QUOTE]

Verification