I wonder what Lavar Ball would give for the reason he specifically gave 30 as the "come on man" age and why his son was f'ed
Well said. If I walk around my city for a few hours and count the women of child bearing age I don't want to bang, it's 90% size, 10% ugliness.
The problem is even 2s and 3 obese women have had drunken sex with 5 and 6 males and think that's what they deserve. 0-4 men aren't given any false hope.
Yes, this (true) analysis is totally beyond most people, and certainly would be denied by all women. It's funny that they just excuse all the wasted time from age 20-30something when the desire comes after 30 to finally have a family, as if they didn't know that would happen. Well, ladies, if you purposefully ignore it, of course it'll happen all of a sudden!
The problem is being honest to women in a sense about their prospects or SMV - no one wants to do it especially in the modern and insane "sensitivity" age. There have been ugly and unmarriageable women for time immemorial. One just has to understand this, and send them off to work, or finagle a family deal where someone will take the ugly duckling. Right? It's not like we didn't have solutions to this 200k year problem already. Weird.
There’s always that old standby, the all-girls boarding school. (Or convent.)Yea, it’s admittedly a bit of an extreme example. I suppose the idea being that ideally your 16 old daughter will be raised with some discipline and morals, but if she must be a wild child, she can do it in the proper venues. The problem I see is that women have this weird in-between status between full development (15-16) and when they are deemed adults by culture and law (18-21), and that breeds alot of negative, rebelious behavior. I personally think women have no business in schools beyond 16 unless they have specific goals in mind. I believe the majority women are simply more interested in mate selection, and “education” and “career” was always just code for “access to higher status men” for most.