What my addition to the SPLC list means to you

[Excelsior]

My sex life will be underground (like the railroad).

*sigh* I can't believe how anti-man things have become in America. I wonder if women in the USA truly want every guy to be like Homer Simpson or Peter Griffith.

They don't. This is the inherent paradox of their modern feminism.

They seek to create more tame, "equitable" men and (judging from the emasculation of the average American guy in many parts of this country) they have succeeded.

The problem is that they cannot ignore their biology, which tells them that such men are not really attractive. Now that they have succeeded in creating the more neutered and equalist male they wanted to make, they complain that they cannot find "good men" (attractive, masculine men, that is) who are willing to "man up", and often find themselves dissatisfied with or cheating on the more tame betas they created and married (hence skyrocketing divorce rate and female initiation of divorce 70% of the time).

Conclusion: Women are not happy, never have been happy, and probably never will be happy. Every solution comes with a new complaint-they can't live without them.

 

[Puck]

Just a heads up to any Canadians in here: Look into the Canadian Human Rights Commission as well as your provincial human rights commission.

There have been incidences (ie. Warman v. Lemire) where Canadians have been prosecuted for posting "hate" messages on the internet. These organisations are typically staffed by the same type of people who work at the SPLC.

It's unlikely to happen and probably not a problem for the general game/lifestyle/everything discussion, but you might want to be careful about broad and negative generalisations of women if you're in Canada.

 

[Bad Hussar]

It means nothing to me. I have no respect at all for the SPLC. They are such an obvious scam I don't know how anyone could take them seriously. If it really is true that they solicit donations from poor people who can't afford it and don't know any better they are truely vile. Worse than tele-evangelist types even. Worse than Madoff. At least he only stole from the super-rich. Paraphrasing a great ex US President: "I would welcome their hatred!"

I agree that this thing will likely blow over pretty quickly. The worst that may happen is that this site is listed on some internet lists and blocked from work networks. But that may have been happening already.

 

[Samseau]

I've been documenting more and more of my bangs, but after this shit I'll refrain from posting pics. Too bad.

I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to post pics of girls you've banged (although I would black out the faces just in case). I doubt any of them could sue you for defamation because if you really slept with them, then truth is the ultimate defense to libel.

Legality? The least of my concerns.


Try:

- Being publicly outed
- Put on sex offenders list
- Losing my job



This is America, where being accused is just as bad as being guilty.

 

[Bad Hussar]

Just a heads up to any Canadians in here: Look into the Canadian Human Rights Commission as well as your provincial human rights commission.

There have been incidences (ie. Warman v. Lemire) where Canadians have been prosecuted for posting "hate" messages on the internet. These organisations are typically staffed by the same type of people who work at the SPLC.

It's unlikely to happen and probably not a problem for the general game/lifestyle/everything discussion, but you might want to be careful about broad and negative generalisations of women if you're in Canada.

Yes, Warman is the Morris Dees of Canada.

Mark Steyn of Macleans magazine set out so clearly and brilliantly what is wrong with the CHRC's and Warman I don't think it's possible to improve on.

He should turn his pen to the SPLC if he hasn't already.

 

[Commander Shepard]

I've been documenting more and more of my bangs, but after this shit I'll refrain from posting pics. Too bad.

I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to post pics of girls you've banged (although I would black out the faces just in case). I doubt any of them could sue you for defamation because if you really slept with them, then truth is the ultimate defense to libel.

Legality? The least of my concerns.


Try:

- Being publicly outed
- Put on sex offenders list
- Losing my job



This is America, where being accused is just as bad as being guilty.

Aint that the truth.

 

[Thorfinnsson]

I suppose this was inevitable.

I am active in some more extreme political movements and take care to shield my privacy.

No big deal, and as many of y'all have said it shows we've arrived.

 

[46.]

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it only Roosh's Blog that was cited as "hateful"? So technically, isn't the Forum free of "hate" and any unpleasantries that may come with it?

 

[Thorfinnsson]

How very naive of you.

Not only do several of the articles about this link to the forum and specific threads here, but even if that wasn't the case you think people would just ignore the forum.

If anything the forum is more full of "hate" since messageboard posts are more impulsive than blog posts.

 

[Vacancier Permanent]

Wow, just read the link Roosh posted and the links to our forum and this is behind ridiculous. They even mentioned the thread I started about logical reasons not to marry. ROTFL. Lesson to learn from this: one more reason to accelerate your departure from real life 1984 that North America is turning into becoming. Oh Roosh, an advice, move your servers to a more truly freeer country, just in case. Oh and you should seriously think into making the forum a private one where like other forums, new applications have to be approved by admins. Set up a team of select people as admins and give them along with you, authority to authorize new people's registrations. And if I were you, I'd even go as far as creating a private forum away from those unwanted lurkers and other spies that could infiltrate in here.

 

[Stoic]

While I join Roosh in encouraging you to adhere to common-sense posting, and urge you to think of this as a public forum (which it always has been), I'd also add that this should serve as a reminder that you are part of a movement--whether you continue to post here or not.

Just like those "occupiers" thought everything was all fun and games until they got pepper-sprayed in the face with little or not provocation, this little incident should remind you that the simple fact that: you aren't subscribed to the get-an-office-job-get-married-have-kids-retire ethos; don't conceal or suppress your male sexuality; and approach women on the street; makes you a foot soldier in a lifestyle that, while rapidly increasing in numbers, is threatening to influential forces that want you to stay in your place, do what you're told, and shut up.

We're warriors. Let's remember that.

Hoorah!

 

[46.]

How very naive of you.

Not only do several of the articles about this link to the forum and specific threads here, but even if that wasn't the case you think people would just ignore the forum.

If anything the forum is more full of "hate" since messageboard posts are more impulsive than blog posts.

Well, obviously you are correct on both counts but I wasn't referring to "articles" but rather the SPLC "Intelligence Report" or whatever makes you "hateful."

 

[tenderman100]

As my profile rises, I will get increasingly noticed by mainstream commentators and establishment types who don't agree with our world view. They will do everything to label our legal discussions as hate speech or misogyny. They will fail because...

1. There are currently no laws on the books that makes this forum or the discussions contained wherein illegal. It is not illegal to say you "banged a slut" and it's not illegal to make fun of masculine women or fatties (otherwise I'd be serving a life sentence with no possibility of parole... actually I'd probably get the chair).

2. There is no law against "misogyny." Even though we actively meet women with the end result of giving them orgasms and sexual pleasure, we will all be labeled woman haters. It's up to you to either be fearful of that label or debate and push back against their nonsense attacks that aren't based on fact or reality.

I know that many of you have professional lives and do not want your legal name to be outed. I understand this concern. I will never divulge your email address or IP address information. I also don't see any legal grounds for a subpoena from a law enforcement agency. Keep it legal and they will have absolutely no basis to harass us.

The best advice I can give everyone is to think of the Jumbotron test, to know that what you write here is available to anyone, even our enemies. Don't share your personal information (name, address, detailed job title information) and don't share details on illegal acts, no matter how minor. It's still okay to say you banged a slut raw dog, though. :hump:

If I'm not scared, and I'm the guy they are gunning for, you shouldn't be either.

Roosh, the SPLC, in its current incarnation, is the inevitable result of leftist political correctness run completely amuck.

 

[tenderman100]

Everybody, watch this entertaining speech from Mark Steyn about the crushing of free speech.

Steyn gave this talk in support of Australian journalist Andrew Bolt who was being prosecuted in an Australian court for racial discrimination. Nine people sued Bolt and his paper, theHerald-Sun over Bolt's suggestion that some people choose to assert Aboriginal ancestry in order to advance their careers.

The event was attended by nearly 600 people deeply concerned -- as well they might be -- by this sinister threat freedom.