Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Women
Women general
What responsibility do men bear for current dating market?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ScannerLIV" data-source="post: 1290294" data-attributes="member: 13599"><p>Imagine how over the moon a girl would often be in the pre-internet era when a random guy, using the right game tools, charmed her, made her laughed one or two times, and had to actually make a phone calls. </p><p></p><p>She'd be curled up on bed for hours, waiting for her charismatic guy to call her, mournfully looking at her phone box. A guy she might have met in high school, cafe, college campus, anywhere. </p><p></p><p>Because back then, there was no internet and thus no red pill/game forums. So you had very few guys in the know slaying innocent lambs left and right. It is this group that made up the 10-20/90 percent rule. </p><p></p><p>That is the trade-off with technology.</p><p></p><p>Still, I think we would have been happier without internet/superficial technology today. Internet, with all of the corresponding websites/apps, alone deformed the sexual market by at least sixty percent. Add smartphone and that's another twenty percent. The rest-feminism. </p><p></p><p>BUT.....then the media knowledge would be 100 percent controlled by the corporation/ruling class and we'd have no way to verify anything. The hundreds of authors/books we'd never hear/read were it not for the internet. </p><p></p><p>At the same time....do they really improve our lives in the grand scheme of things? Does the knowledge actually enhances or hinders our own happiness? After all, relatively very people are informed or have the actual desire to be informed on anything, so being the educated few is rather moot.</p><p></p><p>We don't see people on the street anymore do we? If you get the chance, grab Los Angeles Decades Photography book at the book store/library. You're guaranteed to see swarming masses of people on the streets and at the corners of cinema, book stores, cafes, etc pre 90's. You won't find that anywhere in Los Angeles nor in US..except for Boston and New York today. Drive all day. No people. None, nada. Just a bunch on the main streets, where they also have driven to and from. It depresses me greatly and what I miss about Europe. This is because of endless entertainment and distractions provided by television (hundreds of channels), YouTube (million plus videos?), Facebook, video games, porn, and so on. Dick on Tap, otherwise known as Tinder, delivered directly to the ladies at absolutely zero cost. Even shipping is free! </p><p></p><p>So....it's hard to say......I think, overall, keeping the last two sections in mind, we'd have been better off without internet and its corresponding technologies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ScannerLIV, post: 1290294, member: 13599"] Imagine how over the moon a girl would often be in the pre-internet era when a random guy, using the right game tools, charmed her, made her laughed one or two times, and had to actually make a phone calls. She'd be curled up on bed for hours, waiting for her charismatic guy to call her, mournfully looking at her phone box. A guy she might have met in high school, cafe, college campus, anywhere. Because back then, there was no internet and thus no red pill/game forums. So you had very few guys in the know slaying innocent lambs left and right. It is this group that made up the 10-20/90 percent rule. That is the trade-off with technology. Still, I think we would have been happier without internet/superficial technology today. Internet, with all of the corresponding websites/apps, alone deformed the sexual market by at least sixty percent. Add smartphone and that's another twenty percent. The rest-feminism. BUT.....then the media knowledge would be 100 percent controlled by the corporation/ruling class and we'd have no way to verify anything. The hundreds of authors/books we'd never hear/read were it not for the internet. At the same time....do they really improve our lives in the grand scheme of things? Does the knowledge actually enhances or hinders our own happiness? After all, relatively very people are informed or have the actual desire to be informed on anything, so being the educated few is rather moot. We don't see people on the street anymore do we? If you get the chance, grab Los Angeles Decades Photography book at the book store/library. You're guaranteed to see swarming masses of people on the streets and at the corners of cinema, book stores, cafes, etc pre 90's. You won't find that anywhere in Los Angeles nor in US..except for Boston and New York today. Drive all day. No people. None, nada. Just a bunch on the main streets, where they also have driven to and from. It depresses me greatly and what I miss about Europe. This is because of endless entertainment and distractions provided by television (hundreds of channels), YouTube (million plus videos?), Facebook, video games, porn, and so on. Dick on Tap, otherwise known as Tinder, delivered directly to the ladies at absolutely zero cost. Even shipping is free! So....it's hard to say......I think, overall, keeping the last two sections in mind, we'd have been better off without internet and its corresponding technologies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Women
Women general
What responsibility do men bear for current dating market?
Top
