When did you get redpilled on WW2?

Please feel free to give an example of DI going back and forth on the holocaust. He was hounded by the ADL and jewish organisations for standing firm on his assertion that there was no evidence, in fact the contrary, that Hitler had a plan to eradicate the Jews.

You clearly know nothing about DI if you seriously think that he would attribute quotes to his subjects without first verifying them: that was the hallmark of his work, he was one of the most highhly regarded historians along with Steven Runciman of the 20th Century. Hitlers Table talks - whatever that is, is a strawman argument that's completely irrelevant. The 'artefact' quote I gave is from Hitlers War, by David Irving, and it was recorded, contemporaneously, by one of the generals present when he said it.

What do you mean he didn't have anyone around to record his regular talks? I'm talking about Irving's years of meticulous research getting first hand, uadulterated notes taken by those who were present when he said these things in his staff meetings. It's from the personal diaries of his inner circle.

I could believe a guy on the internet who's done some WWII research on Bitchute etc about Hitler, or I could read David Irving's voluminous work covering every angle of the war using hundreds of verified contemporaneous sources, for which he was imprisoned and bankrupted by the ADL and its proxies, and take a view from his writings. It's a hard choice, but I'm gonna stick with the view that Hitler had contempt for Christianity and viewed it as a Jewish construct designed to ensnare the goyim.

I think he was wrong about this.
Then how do you explain all of his quotes from his speeches and the writings of Mein Kampf in regards to Christianity, something Irving says he thinks Hitler didn't even write? Its not just some guy on bitchute, if you look at the source material you will see many more references to Christianity in a positive light. One off-handed comment that could have been taken out of context by a general who could have been an aristocrat doesn't constitute him thinking what the pagans of today say about Christianity. Irving recently admitted that gassings took place in the woods, not in the camps themselves, which is odd. I figure that, at 83 years old, the age at which he offered some recanting of his work, after decades of pushback and seeing narrow list of allies dwindle over time, he was probably fixated on a few final years of peace and not dying in prison. And he only implicated himself, not the work of others. Regardless, his work is still out there and can't be unwritten. His self-preservation doesn't diminish his service. If you're going by number of comments from Hitler for and against Christianity, the recorded number of pro-Christianity sentiments far outweigh anything negative. Many of his negative comments were in regards to hypocritical Christians who would use their faith as an affront to wage war, do backhanded deals, or distort the truth, while shielding themselves behind the bible. He said this about Neville Chaimberlain in 39. He never said anything derogatory about the Catholic church in his entire life. He was against the bickering and squabbling of the churches between themselves, which he saw as a source of strife to the German people, so many of his comments may sound harsh to western ears of people who do not live with severe religious schism keeping the people divided.

Anyhow, from Hitler's War, the pdf itself says the following:

"Thus spoke Adolf Hitler, aged thirty-three, in December 1922. Touching upon religion, he said simply that Christianity was the only possible ethical foundation for Germany, and that religious strife was the worst misfortune that could befall her." - page 6.

"On January 21 he delivered the first of many secret speeches to his generals. An anonymous three-page summary exists, showing that Hitler began with a description of the Roman Empire, and how thereafter Christianity had given western civilisation the inner unity it needed to stave off eastern invasions" - page 51.

"Adolf hitler’sattitude toward the Church was ambivalent. Even though now absolute dictator he still hesitated to launch a terminal crusade against it. He had expressly forbidden newspapers to print any reference to schisms between the various religions, and transgressors were heavily punished. In April 1938 all editors had been circularised by the propaganda ministry, ‘The embargo on polemics against Christianity and the Church is still in force.’ When in 1939 a squabble broke out over the desire of the churches to mark the Führer’s fiftieth birthday by peals of bells, Hitler ruled, ‘The churches are not to be prevented from celebrating the event. But nor are they to be compelled to.’" - page 181.

"The Führer was however hard to please, for when at Christmas the Essener National-Zeitung ventured a seasonal comparison between Adolf Hitler and the Messiah, Goebbels confidentially informed the entire German press that the Führer would prefer them to abstain from such comparisons in the future." - pages 264-265.

"something distantly resembling the spirit of Christmas overcame Hitler. Instructing Göring’s Luftwaffe to suspend all bombing missions against Britain until the Christian festival was over, he set out with his personal staff on a Christmas tour of the western front." - page 352.

There are some passages that are not direct quotes, but are literally dinner table talks, which don't have any veracity. The jewish artefact passage is one of them, and so is another where the writer discusses the barbarity of church executions of the past by quartering and torturing. These all are not quoted in the same linguistic style of Hitler's speaking, but are different, even to my western ears when reciting them. To microanalyze this is folly, we all have had our doubts about the faith before coming fully into God's grace, and I can't judge a man whose out-of-context dinner conversations were taken and written to attempt to analyze his attitudes, when he clearly adopted a pro-Christian sentiment with clear separation of church and state.
 
Last edited:
For those of you interested in more minute details about life back then, before, during , and after the war, another great interview with General Leon Degrelle from some time in the late 80s to early 90s is more confirmation of the same thing, but this man speaks with gusto. He was one of the last great orators just like Hitler who gathered his own countrymen in the same way in Belgium. I implore every truth seeker and junior historian to listen to this. He talks about everything from the concept of Europe beyond the nation state, to the economics, to the personal lives of the top brass of the third Reich, to combat details, to the lies of the holocaust, and more.

LÉON DEGRELLE SPEAKS: GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN WAFFEN-SS​


Concentration camp material starts at 1:02:00 and goes to about 1:27:30 (he put Wiesenthal's cowardice on display, and part of me feels like that's why he did not live much longer after this interview). The last part talks about the great overlooked war of history because of the smearing of the jewish myth, and Leon's incredible escape to Spain after the capitulation.
 
Last edited:

GuitarVH

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
For those of you interested in more minute details about life back then, before, during , and after the war, another great interview with General Leon Degrelle from some time in the late 80s to early 90s is more confirmation of the same thing, but this man speaks with gusto. He was one of the last great orators just like Hitler who gathered his own countrymen in the same way in Belgium. I implore every truth seeker and junior historian to listen to this. He talks about everything from the concept of Europe beyond the nation state, to the economics, to the personal lives of the top brass of the third Reich, to combat details, to the lies of the holocaust, and more.

LÉON DEGRELLE SPEAKS: GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN WAFFEN-SS​


Concentration camp material starts at 1:02:00 and goes to about 1:27:30 (he put Wiesenthal's cowardice on display, and part of me feels like that's why he did not live much longer after this interview). The last part talks about the great overlooked war of history because of the smearing of the jewish myth, and Leon's incredible escape to Spain after the capitulation.


Yes, I put this interview video up on Page 3 of this thread. It's quite good. Here's an index guide to the main points:

0:47 - Early life
2:48 - Political beginnings and birth of the Rexist party
12:18 - The beginning of WW2, and the occupation of Belgium
17:18 - The eastern front, and the birth of the European consciousness
23:54 - The plans for a new Europe, and the Degrelle's views on the Slavic peoples
28:54 - The Wallonie division, and the Waffen-SS
33:26 - Hitler and Islam, and the meaning of Racism
36:31 - The cost of creating a new order
37:19 - About Adolf Hitler, p.1
43:55 - The economical rebirth of Germany
48:43 - About Adolf Hitler, p.2
51:30 - About Winston Churchill and England
57:50 - On the other high ranking officials
1:02:22 - On the concentration camps and the gas chambers
1:09:35 - The kidnapping attempts made by the Israelis
1:12:42 - More on the gas chambers
1:23:38 - On the crimes committed by Israel against the Arabs people
1:27:28 - On the current state of Europe and the last days of the war
1:33:31 - Escaping to Spain after the German capitulation
1:41:31 - The necessity of the Jewish deportation, and the spreading of lies in the press
1:46:28 - Degrelle's decorations, and Degrelle's promotions
1:49:23 - Degrelle's message to today's youth
1:56:27 - Degrelle's book conclusion
 

charliec12

 
Banned
Orthodox
Then how do you explain all of his quotes from his speeches and the writings of Mein Kampf in regards to Christianity, something Irving says he thinks Hitler didn't even write? Its not just some guy on bitchute, if you look at the source material you will see many more references to Christianity in a positive light. One off-handed comment that could have been taken out of context by a general who could have been an aristocrat doesn't constitute him thinking what the pagans of today say about Christianity. Irving recently admitted that gassings took place in the woods, not in the camps themselves, which is odd. I figure that, at 83 years old, the age at which he offered some recanting of his work, after decades of pushback and seeing narrow list of allies dwindle over time, he was probably fixated on a few final years of peace and not dying in prison. And he only implicated himself, not the work of others. Regardless, his work is still out there and can't be unwritten. His self-preservation doesn't diminish his service. If you're going by number of comments from Hitler for and against Christianity, the recorded number of pro-Christianity sentiments far outweigh anything negative. Many of his negative comments were in regards to hypocritical Christians who would use their faith as an affront to wage war, do backhanded deals, or distort the truth, while shielding themselves behind the bible. He said this about Neville Chaimberlain in 39. He never said anything derogatory about the Catholic church in his entire life. He was against the bickering and squabbling of the churches between themselves, which he saw as a source of strife to the German people, so many of his comments may sound harsh to western ears of people who do not live with severe religious schism keeping the people divided.

Anyhow, from Hitler's War, the pdf itself says the following:

"Thus spoke Adolf Hitler, aged thirty-three, in December 1922. Touching upon religion, he said simply that Christianity was the only possible ethical foundation for Germany, and that religious strife was the worst misfortune that could befall her." - page 6.

"On January 21 he delivered the first of many secret speeches to his generals. An anonymous three-page summary exists, showing that Hitler began with a description of the Roman Empire, and how thereafter Christianity had given western civilisation the inner unity it needed to stave off eastern invasions" - page 51.

"Adolf hitler’sattitude toward the Church was ambivalent. Even though now absolute dictator he still hesitated to launch a terminal crusade against it. He had expressly forbidden newspapers to print any reference to schisms between the various religions, and transgressors were heavily punished. In April 1938 all editors had been circularised by the propaganda ministry, ‘The embargo on polemics against Christianity and the Church is still in force.’ When in 1939 a squabble broke out over the desire of the churches to mark the Führer’s fiftieth birthday by peals of bells, Hitler ruled, ‘The churches are not to be prevented from celebrating the event. But nor are they to be compelled to.’" - page 181.

"The Führer was however hard to please, for when at Christmas the Essener National-Zeitung ventured a seasonal comparison between Adolf Hitler and the Messiah, Goebbels confidentially informed the entire German press that the Führer would prefer them to abstain from such comparisons in the future." - pages 264-265.

"something distantly resembling the spirit of Christmas overcame Hitler. Instructing Göring’s Luftwaffe to suspend all bombing missions against Britain until the Christian festival was over, he set out with his personal staff on a Christmas tour of the western front." - page 352.

There are some passages that are not direct quotes, but are literally dinner table talks, which don't have any veracity. The jewish artefact passage is one of them, and so is another where the writer discusses the barbarity of church executions of the past by quartering and torturing. These all are not quoted in the same linguistic style of Hitler's speaking, but are different, even to my western ears when reciting them. To microanalyze this is folly, we all have had our doubts about the faith before coming fully into God's grace, and I can't judge a man whose out-of-context dinner conversations were taken and written to attempt to analyze his attitudes, when he clearly adopted a pro-Christian sentiment with clear separation of church and state.

I can't find any of these quotes listed, I have the original books which don't seem to coincide with the page numbers you've given from the pdf. I don't doubt they are in the books though, and they also clearly support the assertion that Hitler was, at best, ambivalent about Christianity ie he didn't launch a crusade against it when in absolute power because he understood its cohesive value to Germany

Anyone who takes from this that he was a practising Christian is deluded
 
I can't find any of these quotes listed, I have the original books which don't seem to coincide with the page numbers you've given from the pdf. I don't doubt they are in the books though, and they also clearly support the assertion that Hitler was, at best, ambivalent about Christianity ie he didn't launch a crusade against it when in absolute power because he understood its cohesive value to Germany

Anyone who takes from this that he was a practising Christian is deluded

Here is one of them from the pdf. All the quotes I have used from Hitler in all previous posts are from his official speeches or passages in Mein Kampf, not secondhand or dubious thirdhand sources, which are in some of these books by Irving. The words and writings of Hitler himself far outweigh what smearing is said of him in private, whether a "quotation" or a paraphrasing, or a dinner talk.

hh-irving1.jpg

I will explain why it does not matter that he wasn't the most "Christian" in terms of his daily life. These dismissals of him because of that simply exonerate the lies that have been told to the contrary lies which nearly wiped out the German race! "If he wasn't Christian, he must be something else, and if he's something else, the Christian masses of America and Europe can be tricked to despise what is not like them, and he can be tarnished with all sorts of bogus occult claims," which I have clearly disproven in earlier posts with evidence. If he is tarnished with these claims, then anyone who rises to his defense is seen as an agitator. Then no one can truly rise without interference from government agencies to create a true movement that will free the people from economic slavery. This system will never suffer another like this man and has taken long term insurance policies through academia, institutional corruption, and complete moral degradation to prevent this. The psyop of this whole thing is one of the longest in history. So I will push through these lies to awaken all of you to the inconvenient truths that were hidden from our upbringings, and the myth of the holocaust is just the beginning. The true revival, of a Christian Europe spearhead, is what we all should all be focusing on as the descendants of those who spread the Gospel.

They dreamed of something marvelous, and though many of us would likely never have been born if they had won the war due to chance and fate of our parents and grandparents meeting others and many never immigrating across the world, it would have given ended the supremacy of the jewish banking cartels and we would be dealing with none of the problems we have today. Despite other wars of nation versus nation, Hitler was the last true independent leader of a nation that defied the NWO, and he was a Catholic until the end. He was never excommunicated, he received all the sacraments in his youth, and he actively worked for the good of all Christian sects as Chancellor. His refusal to create a religious state itself speaks volumes on his attitudes on the church, he did not want to be embroiled with petty schisms and tarnish the cleanliness of the church with the dirtiness of politics. Your sentiment is quite demoralizing. With great sacrifice comes great joy, even if it is ones own life for ones people. This is the realization that many lukewarm-faithed Christians fail to realize. You will have to give up your dreams, your plans, your comforts, your blood, and your life, for your people if you are to turn back the tide of atheism, satanism, talmudism, and bolshevism that intends to destroy it, because that enemy of Christianity, and of Europe, never sleeps, and never stops. His actions, particularly those of the eastern front, though not victorious in the end, had spared most of Europe from extinction, which has been applied gradually since 1945. Even to this day, a Frenchmen is still a Frenchman, a Finn is a Finn, an Italian is an Italian. The European is not destroyed, perhaps the national socialist German of that era is, but the German himself is not. The European, from Vladivostok to the North Baltic Sea, from the straits of Gibraltar to the ruins of Constantinople, is the only being capable of stewardship of civilization with Christianity as its foundation, to bring peace to the world and the masses to the path of salvation. I don't know where your family was during these times, but I can speak the sentiment of others who were liberated by the Germans and are still struggling to this day. If anyone reads Serbian, then I don't need to translate this:

truthserbia.jpg

[Above: The title of the left side says - 'Father', and the right says - 'Mother'. We'll begin with Father.

Father...

If June 22th, 1941 hadn't happened!...

You would have witnessed a day of lechery and villainy of your own children, children of your relatives, friends and neighbors!
Under the bolshevik government, you, as a parent, would have been deprived of the right of upbringing your posterity.
Because you, Serbian father, are not able to bring up "pioneers of soviet thought"! The bolshevist government would have undertaken this duty itself!
And bolshevism doesn't cultivate generous natures in people, but wakes up destructive tendencies...
Mother...

If June 22th, 1941 hadn't happened!...

Your son would have been lost in [...] and drunkenness! You woundn't have been able to forbid him, because bolshevism would have destroyed your mother's authority!
Your daughter would have given herself to lechery and free love, because the new religion - communism - propagates it!
Your children would have grown up in the streets and become robbers and villains.
Bolshevism doesn't respect family or mother's love and doesn't want children to love and honor their parents!...
.]

June 22nd, 1941 was the first day of Operation Barbarossa. The stakes were far higher then than any of us realize when you examine the long-term sequence of events. The task is before all of us seems impossible in this modern fallen world, but it is not. This frail system would not be able to withstand the rise of another like Hitler, and they would try to kill him at every chance, which is why not one Hitlerian figure must rise, but millions, and in each man who carries the truth with him, not just of the Gospel, but of the histories of his people, will not lay down and die for this enemy. After the Lord and Savior Christ, any moral and decent man with righteous fury in his heart alive these days is the enemy of this world system, and that is the struggle of destiny.
 
Last edited:

charliec12

 
Banned
Orthodox
There‘s a danger of trying to reinvent Hitler as a Christian Socialist or a Christian Nationalist when he wasn’t either, his sentiments were ultra-nationalist “Deutschland uber alles in der Welt” and set in opposition to the internationalist class war struggles of the 19th Century which he abolished on achieving power. He was at best ambivalent about Chistianity but not openly hostile to it either – he was opportunistic in harnessing it as a vote catching force in the early years to secure power and achieve his main goal of imperial conquest in the east for Lebensruam.

His tolerance of Christianity was politically expedient and basically opportunistic in that he grasped early on that it would be powerful vote catching (and unifying) force in Germany, and he ‘rode’ it right up to the Chancellery in 1933, then only ever paid lip service to it thereafter. He did exactly the same thing with his anti-Semitism – made the most of it as a tool to get into power then dropped it and focused efforts on re-educating the German nation to his creed in order to create a 1000 year Reich. God doesn’t enter into this vision which was based on authoritarian rule and obedience, in fact it has a lot more in common with the bolshevic tactic of indoctrination than it does with Christianity which is completely at odds with this goal.

He was a flawed man of his time who used whatever was at hand to achieve his political goal of picking up the German people after the humiliation of the Treaty of Versailles, and reinstating them as once-again a mighty nation. This included using Christianity to that end.

Btw I would say it's well documented that Colonel Gaddafi met the same end as Hitler for taking his country out of the internationalist banking cartel.
 

paternos

Kingfisher
Catholic
Today 78 years ago the 3 day bombing of Germany's Dresden ended.

The city was completely destroyed by 3900 tons of bombs dropped by the Judeo-American empire.

main_1200.jpg

A pile of bodies awaits cremation after the firebombing of Dresden, February 1945.jpg

Real scenes like this later inspired the "eye-witness accounts" of pyres in Treblinka. The empire of lies replaced the real effects of the bombings with the dreams of the holocaust.
 
Last edited:

Bird

Ostrich
Catholic
The destruction of Elbflorenz

The bombing of Dresden was not an act of war and therefore cannot be filed away like a battle.

When the German troops had to retreat after the lost battle of Stalingrad, the war was decided. When the Bolshevists crossed the border to the German Reich for the first time, the fate of the defeated Germans in Nemmersdorf was revealed. Babies were thrown against the walls or the ground by the Red Army soldiers, women were raped and crucified, and any martial law protecting the civilian population lost its meaning. When the first German soldiers were able to push the Bolshevists back out of Nemmersdorf, they saw the full extent of the Red terror. A village, alive until recently, was wiped out in a few hours, from infants to the elderly.
News of the cruelty and contempt for international law spread like wildfire throughout the Reich, and immediately the movement of flight toward the West began. Many of the more than 15 million civilians fled to Dresden.

Once in Dresden, there was a temporary sense of security and one could consider oneself lucky to have survived. Many refugees did not make it and were shot, raped or sank to the cold bottom of the sea when the refugee ship "Wilhelm Gustloff" was shot down while fleeing the Red Terror.

Even though Dresden was considered one of the most beautiful cities in Europe at the time and was nicknamed "Florence on the Elbe," its beauty could only have been a small consolation. The thoughts were too close to the relatives who had not managed to escape or to the sons and fathers who, starved and far outnumbered and outgunned, were fighting a hopeless battle to buy the civilians as much time as they could.

Dresden, crowded with refugees, had no military installations and was not relevant to the war. The Reich capital, Berlin, lay to the north and although there was nothing in Dresden except civilians, both cities were to suffer the same fate.

On 13.02.1945 began a terror against civilians and against a crown jewel of European art.
Not only the civilians, but also the numerous temples of German high culture were the reason why Dresden in particular was to be hit; according to Churchill, one was not fighting against Hitler, but against the spirit of Schiller.
Elbflorenz burned to the ground for more than three days. In the firestorm of English and American bombs, the sun no longer rose or set in Dresden, as the sky was darkened by soot and the streets burned at over 600 degrees Celsius. The adults shrank to the size of children in the firestorms and the children melted into the asphalt of the streets. As best they could, the air raid wardens resisted. When the soot clouds cleared on February 16, 1945, the streets cooled down again and the survivors crawled out of the corners to make the incomprehensible tangible, it must have been a glimpse into hell. For three days, bombs pounded the civilian-filled city. Centuries of European art and history were destroyed and hundreds of thousands met their deaths in flames, slain under the rubble or suffocated in the firestorms that sucked all oxygen from the air.

The fate of Dresden has been the fate of all major German cities. Hamburg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Essen, Munich, Kiel, Bremen, Rostock, Lübeck; everywhere the firestorms of the Allies burned. Thus, the maxim of Germany's liberation can only be regarded as a disguised desecration of corpses.

Germany was made an example of at that time. Those who dare to leave the international banking system are destroyed, disenfranchised, raped, broken and reincorporated to keep the monetary system running.

We commemorate the dead of the Allied Genocide!
 

GuitarVH

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
The destruction of Elbflorenz

The bombing of Dresden was not an act of war and therefore cannot be filed away like a battle.

When the German troops had to retreat after the lost battle of Stalingrad, the war was decided. When the Bolshevists crossed the border to the German Reich for the first time, the fate of the defeated Germans in Nemmersdorf was revealed. Babies were thrown against the walls or the ground by the Red Army soldiers, women were raped and crucified, and any martial law protecting the civilian population lost its meaning. When the first German soldiers were able to push the Bolshevists back out of Nemmersdorf, they saw the full extent of the Red terror. A village, alive until recently, was wiped out in a few hours, from infants to the elderly.
News of the cruelty and contempt for international law spread like wildfire throughout the Reich, and immediately the movement of flight toward the West began. Many of the more than 15 million civilians fled to Dresden.

Once in Dresden, there was a temporary sense of security and one could consider oneself lucky to have survived. Many refugees did not make it and were shot, raped or sank to the cold bottom of the sea when the refugee ship "Wilhelm Gustloff" was shot down while fleeing the Red Terror.

Even though Dresden was considered one of the most beautiful cities in Europe at the time and was nicknamed "Florence on the Elbe," its beauty could only have been a small consolation. The thoughts were too close to the relatives who had not managed to escape or to the sons and fathers who, starved and far outnumbered and outgunned, were fighting a hopeless battle to buy the civilians as much time as they could.

Dresden, crowded with refugees, had no military installations and was not relevant to the war. The Reich capital, Berlin, lay to the north and although there was nothing in Dresden except civilians, both cities were to suffer the same fate.

On 13.02.1945 began a terror against civilians and against a crown jewel of European art.
Not only the civilians, but also the numerous temples of German high culture were the reason why Dresden in particular was to be hit; according to Churchill, one was not fighting against Hitler, but against the spirit of Schiller.
Elbflorenz burned to the ground for more than three days. In the firestorm of English and American bombs, the sun no longer rose or set in Dresden, as the sky was darkened by soot and the streets burned at over 600 degrees Celsius. The adults shrank to the size of children in the firestorms and the children melted into the asphalt of the streets. As best they could, the air raid wardens resisted. When the soot clouds cleared on February 16, 1945, the streets cooled down again and the survivors crawled out of the corners to make the incomprehensible tangible, it must have been a glimpse into hell. For three days, bombs pounded the civilian-filled city. Centuries of European art and history were destroyed and hundreds of thousands met their deaths in flames, slain under the rubble or suffocated in the firestorms that sucked all oxygen from the air.

The fate of Dresden has been the fate of all major German cities. Hamburg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Essen, Munich, Kiel, Bremen, Rostock, Lübeck; everywhere the firestorms of the Allies burned. Thus, the maxim of Germany's liberation can only be regarded as a disguised desecration of corpses.

Germany was made an example of at that time. Those who dare to leave the international banking system are destroyed, disenfranchised, raped, broken and reincorporated to keep the monetary system running.

We commemorate the dead of the Allied Genocide!

Got the book Hellstorm (https://www.moneytreepublishing.com/shop/hellstorm) last year. It's a very difficult read but goes into the details of what was done to the Germans from 1944 to 1947. The Holocaust happened to the Germans. The perpetrators then turned around and denied the well-deserved sympathy the Germans deserved for suffering the worst war atrocities in history and fabricated a fake one implicating the victims instead. This is the Jewish Empire of Lies we currently live in.
 

paternos

Kingfisher
Catholic
More than a 1000 British and American bombers were used over the course of 3 days. A combination of firebombs and brute explosives. Dropped mostly at the city center. Drop the bombs. Fly back. Reload. Drop the bombs.

Imagine +1000 bombers. Firebombs.

That's utter destruction of everything. Everyone.

That's not a work camp. These people were not send to a work camp to help the allies.

No they were murdered.


The destruction of Elbflorenz

The bombing of Dresden was not an act of war and therefore cannot be filed away like a battle.

When the German troops had to retreat after the lost battle of Stalingrad, the war was decided. When the Bolshevists crossed the border to the German Reich for the first time, the fate of the defeated Germans in Nemmersdorf was revealed. Babies were thrown against the walls or the ground by the Red Army soldiers, women were raped and crucified, and any martial law protecting the civilian population lost its meaning. When the first German soldiers were able to push the Bolshevists back out of Nemmersdorf, they saw the full extent of the Red terror. A village, alive until recently, was wiped out in a few hours, from infants to the elderly.
News of the cruelty and contempt for international law spread like wildfire throughout the Reich, and immediately the movement of flight toward the West began. Many of the more than 15 million civilians fled to Dresden.

Once in Dresden, there was a temporary sense of security and one could consider oneself lucky to have survived. Many refugees did not make it and were shot, raped or sank to the cold bottom of the sea when the refugee ship "Wilhelm Gustloff" was shot down while fleeing the Red Terror.

Even though Dresden was considered one of the most beautiful cities in Europe at the time and was nicknamed "Florence on the Elbe," its beauty could only have been a small consolation. The thoughts were too close to the relatives who had not managed to escape or to the sons and fathers who, starved and far outnumbered and outgunned, were fighting a hopeless battle to buy the civilians as much time as they could.

Dresden, crowded with refugees, had no military installations and was not relevant to the war. The Reich capital, Berlin, lay to the north and although there was nothing in Dresden except civilians, both cities were to suffer the same fate.

On 13.02.1945 began a terror against civilians and against a crown jewel of European art.
Not only the civilians, but also the numerous temples of German high culture were the reason why Dresden in particular was to be hit; according to Churchill, one was not fighting against Hitler, but against the spirit of Schiller.
Elbflorenz burned to the ground for more than three days. In the firestorm of English and American bombs, the sun no longer rose or set in Dresden, as the sky was darkened by soot and the streets burned at over 600 degrees Celsius. The adults shrank to the size of children in the firestorms and the children melted into the asphalt of the streets. As best they could, the air raid wardens resisted. When the soot clouds cleared on February 16, 1945, the streets cooled down again and the survivors crawled out of the corners to make the incomprehensible tangible, it must have been a glimpse into hell. For three days, bombs pounded the civilian-filled city. Centuries of European art and history were destroyed and hundreds of thousands met their deaths in flames, slain under the rubble or suffocated in the firestorms that sucked all oxygen from the air.

The fate of Dresden has been the fate of all major German cities. Hamburg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Essen, Munich, Kiel, Bremen, Rostock, Lübeck; everywhere the firestorms of the Allies burned. Thus, the maxim of Germany's liberation can only be regarded as a disguised desecration of corpses.

Germany was made an example of at that time. Those who dare to leave the international banking system are destroyed, disenfranchised, raped, broken and reincorporated to keep the monetary system running.

We commemorate the dead of the Allied Genocide!
 

paternos

Kingfisher
Catholic
Got the book Hellstorm (https://www.moneytreepublishing.com/shop/hellstorm) last year. It's a very difficult read but goes into the details of what was done to the Germans from 1944 to 1947. The Holocaust happened to the Germans. The perpetrators then turned around and denied the well-deserved sympathy the Germans deserved for suffering the worst war atrocities in history and fabricated a fake one implicating the victims instead. This is the Jewish Empire of Lies we currently live in.

Just been listening to this conversation between the guy who wrote Hellstorm and the guy who made the documentary.

Quite incredible, this is an interview from 2015. 8 years ago. They were spot on on many things today from the historic perspective.

They discuss Putin, Ukraine, Ukranian sex slaves in Tel Aviv, Khasaria, War propaganda, Jewish power, the bad white police vs the black good boy, Jewish control of media.

This was all before Derek Chauvin, Zelensky, Ukraine etc.

If you don't like to read, it's nice to hear them share their ideas.
 
Last edited:

GuitarVH

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
Ernst Zundel: "More Germans were killed in one night, in one city, in one bombing raid that Jews were killed in the whole war" Very true.

Correct. It was possibly between 250,000 and 400,000 people killed in 24 hours. It may be the most human beings killed at one time within 24 hours in recent recorded history. Maybe ever. It was a literal holocaust, unlike the Jewish lies about their work camp experience. You don't hear too much complaining from the Germans and Japanese who were also put into camps in World War II.
 
"The wonders of an age gone by are known to us today,
one tells us of a city on the Elbe banks it lay.
We remember now Dresden, the beautiful town,
the charm and the splendor, a place of renown.
The folk in the city could hear all along,
the banks of the Elbe, a firm joyful song.
Neither Hamburg nor Dresden nor bare Elbe land,
was spared the harsh fate of the murderers hand.
For Germany the sun went down, and flames engulfed the night,
the fires raged and you'll hear Dresdeners scream out in their plight.
The German jewels lost, the flames have left their brand,
all Dresden you are lost now, to the German Fatherland.
How many died, who knows the toll,
in your wounds we read the scroll,
of the nameless ones, in agony burned,
in the hellfires raised by human hand.
The tale of Dresden's fate since then, is not to hand,
for five and forty years, the town was torn from the Fatherland."


You can't find this lovely poem anywhere on the internet, but its here in the introduction and outro of this footage of history about Dresden:

"Fire Storm Over Dresden (With Surviving Witnesses)"
 
Last edited:

God's lonely asperger

Woodpecker
Protestant
Something I've been thinking about recently is how some leftists claim animals are better than people, or that they care about animals more than people. They'll sometimes get happy when a human dies in a movie, but the moment a hecking doggo dies, they'll start crying to no end. These same people believe on the supposed WW2 event with the six bajillions.
So, wouldn't that make Hitler a good guy in their eyes? He was a based vegetarian who passed a ton of animal rights laws in Germany, which he probably pioneered a lot in, and supposedly treated humans badly.
Yet another Hitler W and an L for libtards.
1665949392905144.jpg
 

paternos

Kingfisher
Catholic
Something I've been thinking about recently is how some leftists claim animals are better than people, or that they care about animals more than people. They'll sometimes get happy when a human dies in a movie, but the moment a hecking doggo dies, they'll start crying to no end. These same people believe on the supposed WW2 event with the six bajillions.
So, wouldn't that make Hitler a good guy in their eyes? He was a based vegetarian who passed a ton of animal rights laws in Germany, which he probably pioneered a lot in, and supposedly treated humans badly.
Yet another Hitler W and an L for libtards.
View attachment 55580
You forget about the absolute hierarchy of the universe:

Jews
^^^^^
Sexual deviants
^^^^^
High pigment skins (in western countries that is, no-one cares about black Africans dying in Africa from hunger and war)
^^^^^^
Animals
^^^^^^
Europeans

Jews didn't like work camps, hence Hitler is bad. Europeans are less worthy than animals and black are more, so blacks can eat as much chicken as they want, but Europeans can't. Also Jews can criticize guys dressing up as women (Perfectly fine for Jewish neo-cons) but blacks and whites can never criticize gays. Also Blacks can never criticize Jews. (Kanye).

To take your example, Hitler was critical about Jews which is the greatest sin in the universe. If he was nice to animals, blacks and gays that doesn't compensate for the greatest sin in the universe. Hence Hitler is bad.

It also works the other way. The white man can say: We should all eat steaks as much as we want, I want no immigration and they need to move back, and gay people are bad, but I love the Jews and Israel. That is a perfectly fine neo-con position. In Europe we can many anti-islam parties doing this.

Get it?

You just have to stick with the hierarchy. And if you support the Jews you can do whatever and criticize whoever you want.

If you don't support the Jews though, you can't criticize gays, blacks and you can't eat meat. If you eat a steak then for example:
"Look at this Nazi eating a steak, he is making the climate 1 degree warmer."
 

God's lonely asperger

Woodpecker
Protestant
It also works the other way. The white man can say: We should all eat steaks as much as we want, I want no immigration and they need to move back, and gay people are bad, but I love the Jews and Israel. That is a perfectly fine neo-con position. In Europe we can many anti-islam parties doing this.
Kek, isn't that how Azov works in Ukraine? I've heard they even got funding from Israel.
 

paternos

Kingfisher
Catholic
Kek, isn't that how Azov works in Ukraine? I've heard they even got funding from Israel.
Yep, exactly the same.

Nazi in modern Jewish European society means critical on Jews.

Anyhow this is the main distinction in modern society.

Pro-Jews = Good
Possibly critical of Jewish influence = Nazi

So you indeed can walk around with swastikas, skulls, roman saluting, killing people and you're fine if your pro-Jewish.
Anyhow you're not a Nazi because nazi is being critical of Jewish influence.
 
Top