Where have all the good women gone?

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
Women no longer have the motivation to be good, because there will always be someone to want her, regardless of what she has done!
This is true, but will that be the man that she wants is the real metric of success. And I'd argue that there is where most miss the boat: attention from random guys and commitment attention from the guy you wanna be with are 2 entire different metrics.
 

JCSteel

Pigeon
Other Christian
To marry is to bear the Cross. Whoever does not have the grace from God to be celibate will have to marry a real woman from this century. To say there aren't decent women left is immaterial. Are you able to live without the opposite sex? Pray to God about this. If the answer is no, the next question becomes; where can I meet women of the (relative) highest quality? And it seems evident that, however difficult the times are, our best odds are with truly believing women in solid churches. But until you are able to love a sinner marriage will not satisfy you.

Words of truth.
 

Lawrence87

Kingfisher
Orthodox
I think women are not meant to lead, and when they lack coherent leadership they get lost.

Feminism exemplifies the fact that women do not know what is good for them when they are left to their own devices. That is not to say that they are inherently bad, but they do not see how tallying up multiple sexual partners, travelling, focusing on career etc in their prime years is not a good long term life strategy for a woman. Its a strategy for short term pleasure, and then dying alone, perhaps with a hope that someone in the care facility will be compassionate enough to hold your hand when you pass into the next life. They do not think about things in these terms, because they are not strategic, logical thinkers. If everyone is telling them to 'live, laugh, love' that is going to be their philosophy.

I think questioning like this can be the kind of thing that might possibly wake young women up. 'Don't you worry about dying alone? Wouldn't you rather have your children and grandchildren around you?' Whenever I have said this to women they are genuinely a bit taken aback. They are so used to living for momentary pleasure and short-term gain. They feel like the family thing is always an option, and don't realise that the second best time to start is now.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
I think women are not meant to lead, and when they lack coherent leadership they get lost.

Feminism exemplifies the fact that women do not know what is good for them when they are left to their own devices. That is not to say that they are inherently bad, but they do not see how tallying up multiple sexual partners, travelling, focusing on career etc in their prime years is not a good long term life strategy for a woman. Its a strategy for short term pleasure, and then dying alone, perhaps with a hope that someone in the care facility will be compassionate enough to hold your hand when you pass into the next life. They do not think about things in these terms, because they are not strategic, logical thinkers. If everyone is telling them to 'live, laugh, love' that is going to be their philosophy.

I think questioning like this can be the kind of thing that might possibly wake young women up. 'Don't you worry about dying alone? Wouldn't you rather have your children and grandchildren around you?' Whenever I have said this to women they are genuinely a bit taken aback. They are so used to living for momentary pleasure and short-term gain. They feel like the family thing is always an option, and don't realise that the second best time to start is now.
Feminism is like making fish fly and birds swim. It's a level of retardation that goes against one's DNA to the Nth degree. It's going against the entire psychological, neurological, physical, emotional and spiritual reality of what being a woman is. But hey as you say, that analysis is too hard to make. Women very much ''hope'' for something to happen instead of ''making'' something happen. They act on possibilities, not probabilities. They genuinely believe that after getting their masters, settling their career and doing the traveling prince charming on the white horse 6 ft 2, 100k a year, strong, masculine, fit, leader, funny, charismatic, confident, interesting, ambitious, good relationship with his parents, good father, good brother, good listener, good problem solver, smells good, good hygiene, adventurous, traveler, can solve practical things in the house, etc etc etc etc etc etc, will show up for her. The level of inevitable incredible delusion when the pool of water they think they're seeing turns out to be a fata morgana will be incredible in the coming decades. Brace yourself, it'll be ugly and a very sad thing to witness.
 
Last edited:

Douglas Quaid

Kingfisher
Women very much ''hope'' for something to happen instead of ''making'' something happen.
Slightly off topic, but this is a great way of putting it, and something I've been learning. When a woman shows interest and you think she might be worth it, it's up to the man to make something happen. This is how men and women naturally differ, and why it's important not to get frustrated about it.

Being a man is about making things happen. And deep down, this is how I want it to be.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
Slightly off topic, but this is a great way of putting it, and something I've been learning. When a woman shows interest and you think she might be worth it, it's up to the man to make something happen. This is how men and women naturally differ, and why it's important not to get frustrated about it.

Being a man is about making things happen. And deep down, this is how I want it to be.
The Soviets painted their rusty tanks to make it look brand new. You can change the outside of something, but the inside is the same. Same goes with social conditioning: you can paint the outside, but the inside will always be there, and that disconnect will always linger in either the woman or man at hand. So the man will innately want to be that leader, be respected etc, even though he's not acting on it due to social conditioning, and the woman will want a family, a stable safe security net around her with a leading supporting man, even though she's not acting on it due to social conditioning.

With regard to your first point, that's the entire reason that men have to step up to women in the first place and that a woman never approaches a man. It's the first test to see whether the man makes something happen. If he doesn't do that due to fear, that's an immediate sign that the man at hand will not get anything done in the real world also. Why would he then go out and gather resources, taking that initiative, if he doesn't take that first initiative towards her? How will he ever deal with difficulty if her possible ''rejection'' holds him back? It's just a screening mechanism to filter out those who in the olden days wouldn't have had a good chance of fruitful resource gathering and therefore survival.
 
Top