Which group is responsible for the predicament that Western Civilization finds itself

Which group is responsible for the current predicament Western Civilization finds itself

  • (((The usual suspects))

    Votes: 51 43.2%
  • Women

    Votes: 7 5.9%
  • Christianity

    Votes: 6 5.1%
  • Insecure and weak Beta and Gamma males posing as alphas

    Votes: 7 5.9%
  • The elites (non (((usual suspects)))) who have fallen into decadence

    Votes: 16 13.6%
  • Leftists and leftist allies

    Votes: 21 17.8%
  • Degenerate alpha males who misuse their gifts

    Votes: 2 1.7%
  • Red-pilled men (ourselves) because we have forgotten the lessons of history

    Votes: 8 6.8%

  • Total voters
    118

911

Peacock
Catholic
Gold Member
The American empire that would have been set up by the likes of Patton and Kennedy would have fit the bill. This current empire, the making of PNAC, AIPAC, IMF, CFR and their ilk is a lot closer to the world's nightmare than its best hope.
 

MrLemon

 
Banned
911 said:
The American empire that would have been set up by the likes of Patton and Kennedy would have fit the bill. This current empire, the making of PNAC, AIPAC, IMF, CFR and their ilk is a lot closer to the world's nightmare than its best hope.

The American empire was set up by Patton, Kennedy, and the like. That lasted about 40 years (post WW2 till 80s). Then after the baby boomers started taking over in the 1980s the American empire began changing and going sour. Like I said.

Here's the lessoin: things change. They don't stay stagnant the same way. Read history, it will help with the understanding of the ebbs and flows of society.

And, still you must always answer the question: what alternative do you propose? China? Russia? If you don't have an alternative, then pissing and moaning about the American empire is just pissing and moaning.
 

911

Peacock
Catholic
Gold Member
Your interpretation of modern history is pretty shallow. Patton would have snipped the Soviet empire in the bud. Instead he was eliminated. Kennedy's vision of the American empire was also greatly different from the one we got after he was eliminated by the deep state.

You might benefit from reading history from Quigley, Sutton or Perkins instead of Boomer best-sellers. "Things change!" or "shit happens" seems like shallow take on history. Also shallow are false binaries, the notion that we're either going to get the PNAC empire or the ChiCom reeducation camp.
 

yeppels

Sparrow
Mage said:
wisdom that showed how each individual can connect to the divine directly and installed a universal cult of priesthood. From this point on nearly all the people are dependent on "teachers" and "scriptures" to understand what is true and what is not and are incapable of beholding the truth on their own by uniting with God/nature.

I've been doing a lot of reading about the origins of Buddhism/Taoism, before they became organized religions and were more philosophical, and this message in particular resonates with that philosophy.

Through self study and training, we are all capable of spiritual salvation through our innate biology and environment. However, this is difficult. Very difficult, and for most people, impossible, as it requires the ability to accurately self-reflect, admit ones own faults, and in general be willing to change one's own behavior on a much deeper level that most people are comfortable with. These abilities can be taught, but again through dedicated practice, and without having to resort to any kind of external God.

Unfortunately in order for millions of people with different cultural backgrounds, languages, and traditions, to come together and live in peace, requires a shared narrative and removal of individual responsibility, hence organized religion.
 

MrLemon

 
Banned
911 said:
Your interpretation of modern history is pretty shallow. Patton would have snipped the Soviet empire in the bud. Instead he was eliminated. Kennedy's vision of the American empire was also greatly different from the one we got after he was eliminated by the deep state.

You might benefit from reading history from Quigley, Sutton or Perkins instead of Boomer best-sellers. "Things change!" or "shit happens" seems like shallow take on history. Also shallow are false binaries, the notion that we're either going to get the PNAC empire or the ChiCom reeducation camp.

You still didn't answer the question. What's your alternative to America?
 

Rotten

Robin
I think that the loss of an entire generation of alpha males in WW2 is mostly to blame.

The weak men that followed, and their progeny weren’t up to the task.
 

Enoch

Hummingbird
Rotten said:
I think that the loss of an entire generation of alpha males in WW2 is mostly to blame.

The weak men that followed, and their progeny weren’t up to the task.

For smaller. now uber cucked countries like Germany that theory is particularly relevant.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
MrLemon said:
911 said:
Your interpretation of modern history is pretty shallow. Patton would have snipped the Soviet empire in the bud. Instead he was eliminated. Kennedy's vision of the American empire was also greatly different from the one we got after he was eliminated by the deep state.

You might benefit from reading history from Quigley, Sutton or Perkins instead of Boomer best-sellers. "Things change!" or "shit happens" seems like shallow take on history. Also shallow are false binaries, the notion that we're either going to get the PNAC empire or the ChiCom reeducation camp.

You still didn't answer the question. What's your alternative to America?

No empire. No reserve currency other than gold. A national religion no ifs no buts no exceptions everyone else get out.

That's the least violent outcome of all possible futures currently bearing down on us.
 

Jones

Woodpecker
Leonard D Neubache said:
MrLemon said:
911 said:
Your interpretation of modern history is pretty shallow. Patton would have snipped the Soviet empire in the bud. Instead he was eliminated. Kennedy's vision of the American empire was also greatly different from the one we got after he was eliminated by the deep state.

You might benefit from reading history from Quigley, Sutton or Perkins instead of Boomer best-sellers. "Things change!" or "shit happens" seems like shallow take on history. Also shallow are false binaries, the notion that we're either going to get the PNAC empire or the ChiCom reeducation camp.

You still didn't answer the question. What's your alternative to America?

No empire. No reserve currency other than gold. A national religion no ifs no buts no exceptions everyone else get out.

That's the least violent outcome of all possible futures currently bearing down on us.

Got to read them their Leonard Rights:

"You have the right to use only gold as currency. Any other currency you use can and will result in you facing a court of law. You have the right to the national religion. If you are not of the national religion, get the fuck out. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?”
 

Kid Twist

 
Banned
The Far East may rise in a much different way, one with more open markets and a totally different appearance than what you are used to seeing with Red China --- once the credit squeeze hits, and it'll probably hit there before here. Culturally, the Russians and Chinese have a a theoretical advantage due to adherence to traditionalism even given all of their problems. Their people are still grounded on some level, at large and in general, unlike the people here (including me and you) who are used to convenience and food whenever we desire it.

We don't know what will happen, but as MrLemon says, it will ebb and flow. If the world reserve currency changes, and it will, it'll be a whole new ball game. Either a strange light of freedom will enter or it'll be super odd and dark, hopefully not globally dark.
 
Top