Why are Americans circumcised?
- Thread starter cardguy
- Start date
Waqqle said:
And Feminism relies on a distortion of history as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhfnLoEOTyk
This was from 1961, which feminists claim was an awful time for women, and yet practically every man in the video said yes to the idea of husbands helping with the housework.
I honestly don't know if there was truly a time where being a woman was worse than being a man. Men were always being forced to fight in wars, were indiscriminately killed by invaders (while their wife would go on and remarry one of the invaders), turned into Eunuchs in the Middle East / China and so on and so forth. There's some damning studies regarding DNA inheritance I remember it saying like almost every women gets to reproduce but less than half of men did in ancient times?
mkunduwanyani
Chicken
where i come from you aint a man until you get your schlong cut. girls wont even touch you if you are uncut.
BaatumMania said:
The stat is that everyone currently living has roughly twice as many female genetic ancestors as male ones because only about 40% of males were ever able to reproduce whereas around 80% of women were able to. The other 60% were:
- Shut out of the mating game (80% of women desire 20% of men and that 20% will usually take more than one woman if they can)
- Sterilized (see the Arab slave trade for one example), died before they were able to reproduce (work, war, and disease)
- Cucked or married a divorced/widowed woman who had already had all the kids she was going to (even now, some estimate that around 25% of American fathers are unknowingly raising children who are not biologically theirs - cucking and stepfathering)
- Taken into the clergy or monastic life or
- Have had all of their genetic lines die out by now ("Women and children first!").
Meanwhile, those males who were able to reproduce often did so with more than one female, such as in polygamous situations, prostitution (when the babies were not aborted or thrown on the pile to die like in ancient Rome), affairs, or when a man's first wife died in childbirth or something and he remarried to keep breeding with another woman. Thus, if a man had children with 2 females, the children and descendants of both of those women would carry the man's DNA but they would only carry the DNA of their own mother. Hence, twice as many female ancestors as male. There were also a number of prolific breeders among male warlords, aristocracy, and soldiery and these men skew the stats significantly.
We have twice as many female ancestors than male ancestors.
The Missing Men in Your Family Tree
As someone who was circumcised (for medical reasons) well into my twenties I can attest sex (and masturbation if anyone cares) is worse afterwards. Why wouldn't it be, you've lost thousands of nerve endings. Evolution gave us a foreskin for a reason... it made reproduction more pleasurable and therefore more likely to occur. Moreover, it's not only less pleasurable, it's actually a different feeling. It's more about 'pressure', I can't really describe what I mean in words, guys who've had sex both intact and cut will know what I mean. It's my pet theory as to why American men are more into anal than Europeans, as it's all about a hole as tight as possible. You also have to relearn to masturbate as it's a different experience, and for me at least, I had to almost rewire my brain to find sex pleasurable again as again, it's just very different. Others might report differently.
Blowjobs are way better when you're circumcised though. Before, I never really cared for them apart from the whole dominance aspect. Now, I have that and a more physically pleasurable experience. And, it's definitely cleaner. Even if you wash there daily, it just is and you notice the difference immediately. Trust me. Anyway, my two cents. If I was American and had a son, I wouldn't get him cut.
Blowjobs are way better when you're circumcised though. Before, I never really cared for them apart from the whole dominance aspect. Now, I have that and a more physically pleasurable experience. And, it's definitely cleaner. Even if you wash there daily, it just is and you notice the difference immediately. Trust me. Anyway, my two cents. If I was American and had a son, I wouldn't get him cut.
I got circumcised when I was 1 year old due to an infection and in the country where I was born it is NOT customary. And of course you can imagine the ridicule I had to endure in great school and high school. Felt extremely ashamed to to hit the showers after gym class due to me feeling like a mutilated outcast. May not have been reality but you know how easy it is as a kid to have a complex about being different.
All that changed when I moved to the U.S. in the 1990s. Quickly figured out that almost everyone was circumcised and finally Mr. Happy fit in with all the others. I have to say though: even in Europe none of the girls I banged in my youth ever complained or made me feel weird about it. Must have been mostly in my head.
As to which way feels better: this is one I cannot answer as circumcised is normal to me. I seem to be able to last longer than uncut guys plus from what I was able to gather HIV transmission is less likely as well.
All that changed when I moved to the U.S. in the 1990s. Quickly figured out that almost everyone was circumcised and finally Mr. Happy fit in with all the others. I have to say though: even in Europe none of the girls I banged in my youth ever complained or made me feel weird about it. Must have been mostly in my head.
As to which way feels better: this is one I cannot answer as circumcised is normal to me. I seem to be able to last longer than uncut guys plus from what I was able to gather HIV transmission is less likely as well.
redpillage said:
The primary benefit does appear to be a decrease in the prevalence of bacterial infections, HPV, HIV/AIDS, etc. as well as typically being able to last longer which would seem to go along with the decreased sensitivity. Not sure how much proper hygiene and using protection would effect the first things and the question of whether a guy would rather last longer or feel more is up to him, though babies don't choose. I was circumcised at birth so I've only ever known it one way and will never know what having a foreskin feels like unless mine is restored to me in the hereafter (virgins and foreskins for all).
I have had at least a couple of girls tell me specifically and without provocation that I have a great-looking dick so at least the surgeon was skilled and I have symmetrical features I suppose. I don't think I want my kids to be circumcised, especially as it can go wrong, but, in my own case, there is no use crying over spilt milk.
porscheguy
Ostrich
But how was it going through a circumcision as an adult? I’ve heard they’re not fun.
porscheguy said:
I knew a Papua New Guinean guy back when I was in college and he went and got himself circumcised for aesthetic reasons. The next day, he was slouching a bit and walking funny like a bow-legged cowboy and I think it was a couple of weeks before he was totally fine again. According to him, he elected to do it purely for cosmetic reasons but it did seem to be painful, if not the procedure itself (due to anesthesia), then at least the recovery process.
Aszhaeleos said:
Many American men were circumcised with something called the GOMCO clamp or the Mogen Clamp. The Gomco - short for Goldstein Manafacturing Company - was invented in 1935 by (((Hiram Yellen and Aaron Goldstein))) and the Mogen clamp was invented in 1955 by (((Dr. Harry Bronstein))).
Where would America be without these amazing Jewish inventions?
