For a long time, I had similar questions. If women *really* want to date masculine, fit, decisive men who can hold a good conversation and make them laugh, then why is men studying to become that kind of man a bad thing?
Women love "naturalness" and hate fakes. They love power and hate weakness. They will fuck a thug in a heart beat. But a guy they think is pretending to be a thug? Naw. That pretending looks artificial and weak to them. (This is an important distinction. Do most men demand authenticity before putting our dicks in? Right, of course not).
I think women don't believe that men can learn to become men. They think you either *are* a man, or you're not. Which, when you think of their experience, makes sense--besides being born with a vagina, what do you have to accomplish to be considered a woman?
Hence, to most women, "Game" is men pretending they are something that they aren't. If you pay attention, when they talk about "Game" its usually within the context of men "lying" instead of just being charming/funny/jerkish. I think that's why all these feminist-leaning media outlets are OK shitting on the Manosphere (the one resource many men have for learning how to be a man). Because from their perspective, most of the men involved on it are just fake losers. And since self-improvement isn't part of their constitution (it doesn't have to be, remember, they have vaginas, so they will always be valuable in the SMP), those fake losers will always be fake losers, so fuck them. The "real men" don't need that Manosphere bullshit.