Why are Women Willingly Choosing Soyboys?

ItalianStallion9

Woodpecker
Protestant
I notice men are terrible at judging the genetic quality of other men.

The 6'2 skinny feminine acting guy with sharp facial features has higher genetic quality than a 5'10 classic 1950's "masculine man" who is ripped but norwood 3 at age 40.

Women are like genetic X-ray machines. Their lizard brains are simply ruthless.

Western men love to shit on "feminine kpop idols." Women see their good height (6'1+) and strong facial features such as jawline or good canthal tilt and get wet. Their X-ray sees straight through makeup or gay looking outfits.

No amount of money or status gets a girl wet like raw genetic quality.

So before you label someone as a soyboy, what is their height? canthal tilt? mid-face ratio? these are key genetic indicators

What makes the 6'2 girly acting guy higher genetic quality than a 5'10 masculine man?

Traditionally a woman would be attracted to a protector and provider. In a dangerous situation (ie: robbery) who'd be more likely to step up and protect the wife/kids? Tall skinny girl soycuck or 5'10 macho chad?


Soyboy is a vibe. For soyboy I'm referring to the high pitched voice, the feminine mannerisms, male feminists, and completely whipped with no backbone.
If a woman is so brainwashed she's willing to accept all these traits for a canthal tilt and mid-face ratio...it's no wonder they end up having no respect for these men, divorcing them, and end up very confused on what they even want anymore.
 

Anomaly

Sparrow
Trad Catholic
I notice men are terrible at judging the genetic quality of other men.

The 6'2 skinny feminine acting guy with sharp facial features has higher genetic quality than a 5'10 classic 1950's "masculine man" who is ripped but norwood 3 at age 40.

Women are like genetic X-ray machines. Their lizard brains are simply ruthless.

Western men love to shit on "feminine kpop idols." Women see their good height (6'1+) and strong facial features such as jawline or good canthal tilt and get wet. Their X-ray sees straight through makeup or gay looking outfits.

No amount of money or status gets a girl wet like raw genetic quality.

So before you label someone as a soyboy, what is their height? canthal tilt? mid-face ratio? these are key genetic indicators
You’re actually going by a notion that women should seek these men because of their looks which supposedly indicate genetic fitness, as if women eighteen to 25 years old generally make proper decisions for one of their most important choices in life for which looks should be of utmost concern: who gets on top of them!
 

wewuzkangzz

 
Banned
Orthodox
You’re actually going by a notion that women should seek these men because of their looks which supposedly indicate genetic fitness, as if women eighteen to 25 years old generally make proper decisions for one of their most important choices in life for which looks should be of utmost concern: who gets on top of them!
What is proper? a man who is reliable provider but 5'10 or a druggie who is 6'3?

Men making mate choices for women is why some countries have an average height of 5'5 and some 6'2.

Traditional 1950's mate choice based on reliability and ability to provide hold back human genetics.

No amount of cultural brainwashing, either by the left or right, can replace the tingles she feels when she sees someone in the top 1% of genetics.
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
What makes the 6'2 girly acting guy higher genetic quality than a 5'10 masculine man?

Traditionally a woman would be attracted to a protector and provider. In a dangerous situation (ie: robbery) who'd be more likely to step up and protect the wife/kids? Tall skinny girl soycuck or 5'10 macho chad?


Soyboy is a vibe. For soyboy I'm referring to the high pitched voice, the feminine mannerisms, male feminists, and completely whipped with no backbone.
If a woman is so brainwashed she's willing to accept all these traits for a canthal tilt and mid-face ratio...it's no wonder they end up having no respect for these men, divorcing them, and end up very confused on what they even want anymore.

Here here. What makes him think at 6.2 feminine man is more desirable than a 5.10 masculine man? As for a Norwood 3 or whatever, well, today we have Propecia and other anti-balding remedies, so, this isn't a fair comparison. The 5.10 masculine man today would likely have avoided balding at a young age.

All I can tell you is from my experience, so take this for what it is. I'm masculine, 6.1, handsome, I do have thinning hair but Im 45 years old. Like Roosh I consistently work out doing calisthenics and running. I get more looks from women old and young than any 6.1 or 6.2 skinny fat soyboy. In fact, I've been right next to >6 ft soyboys in public who were a lot younger than me and the girl or woman of any age looks at me and not at them.

Soyboy is not desirable. If women seem to prefer them today than its a because this is what is pushed as a fad. Give them a choice and they choose the masculine man every time, even the bald ones.
 

wewuzkangzz

 
Banned
Orthodox
My point is the term "soyboy" is thrown around way too often, and has no precise meaning. It is a vague way to describe someone you don't like.

Is a 6'6 NBA star who also pushes feminism and vaccines a soy boy?

Is a 5'9 "masculine" manlet somehow not a soy boy, despite being shorter than most teenage girls these days?

What about the 6'3 vegan male model who votes biden?


The OP of this thread is questioning why women willingly choose "soyboys" - i question his ability to evaluate the genetic value of other men.
 
Last edited:

Bitter End

Woodpecker
Orthodox
I have seen some absolute chads and handsome people of German ancestry that settle for a night with the playstation, while sleazy and insolent people of "diverse" and "vibrant" places find plenty of dating options with the "independent" women.

The whole argument about height is just a bit of a stretch because it ascribes too much rationality to the feminine nature. I know it is meant as a primal thing, but to imply that anybody under 6'2 is out of the gene pool is something that can be debunked by walking down the nearest street.

Also, some of the most attractive men I met that get plenty of options are actually very lazy about learning game or studying female psychology. It is like inheriting a mansion. It can mess up one's life with temptation and apathy.
 

wewuzkangzz

 
Banned
Orthodox
What planet do you live on?
Netherlands. Most zoomer generation girls here are 178-180 in height. It's the year 2022, let's get with the times now. European height has consistently increased since 1900.

I am talking about pureblood northern european genetics, not admixtures with afro-asiatics like many southern europeans (or even "dutch") have which horribly skews official statistics in all countries.

Some of the biggest slayers here I know use makeup, listen to kpop, are vegans, and are as far left as you can get. But their high genetic value means girls feel the tingles as soon as they meet. Would you label them "soyboys?"

For prime age women, genetics matters. Post-prime (24+ years old) is when other factors matter when they realize they can't obtain highest genetic value.
 

inthefade

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
Some of the biggest slayers here I know use makeup, listen to kpop, are vegans, and are as far left as you can get. But their high genetic value means girls feel the tingles as soon as they meet. Would you label them "soyboys?"

Absolutely. Literal soyboys if they are vegan. I consider it an attitude or "vibe" or mindset.

Most zoomer generation girls here are 178-180 in heigh

What's your source on that? You understand that's very tall for a woman, a few standard deviations above the rest of the world right?
 

wewuzkangzz

 
Banned
Orthodox
Absolutely. Literal soyboys if they are vegan. I consider it an attitude or "vibe".
Fine with me, but then soyboy is an assessment of someone's political/cultural interests rather than their genetic value.

Women ignore these aspects when you offer high enough genetic quality. The OP of this thread was asking about why women date soyboys.

Genetic value cannot be faked. Women's brains are ruthless machines designed to assess and evaluate your genetic quality, given the risks associated with childbirth. However, one's affiliation with globohomo or diet can be changed at anytime.

Tons of 195cm+ blue eyed nordic warrior looking phenotypes in the Netherlands (pretty average here), who are also vegan environmentalists and vote politically left wing. They have zero trouble with women in any corner of the globe.
 
Last edited:

inthefade

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
Fine with me, but then soyboy is an assessment of someone's political/cultural interests rather than their genetic value.

Women ignore these aspects when you offer high enough genetic quality. The OP of this thread was asking about why women date soyboys.

Genetic value cannot be faked. Women's brains are ruthless machines designed to assess and evaluate your genetic quality, given the risks associated with childbirth. However, one's affiliation with globohomo or diet can be changed at anytime.
Is your argument that all soyboys are perfect genetic specimens and therefore are being chosen?

You're using a tiny subset of so called soyboys(vegan male models?) and applying that reasoning to the whole.
 

wewuzkangzz

 
Banned
Orthodox
Is your argument that all soyboys are perfect genetic specimens and therefore are being chosen?

You're using a tiny subset of so called soyboys(vegan male models?) and applying that reasoning to the whole.
My argument is that "soyboy" is a vague term that does not properly assess someone's genetic value.

As for statistics on height, I recommend taking a trip here. Official statistics include all ethnicities and we have tons of afro-asiatic immigrants and non-pure europeans from poorer countries that drastically skew the averages downward. Unfortunately, to question these people as "dutch" is illegal.

The fact that we are still the tallest nation, according to globohomo statistics that include afro-asiatic populations, is surprising!
 

inthefade

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
My argument is that "soyboy" is a vague term that does not properly assess someone's genetic value.

As for statistics on height, I recommend taking a trip here. Official statistics include all ethnicities and we have tons of afro-asiatic immigrants and non-pure europeans from poorer countries that drastically skew the averages downward. Unfortunately, to question these people as "dutch" is illegal.

The thread is called "why are women willingly choosing soyboys?", and you're saying it's all genetics, right?

This implies that all soyboys have superior genetics yes?

Since this is obviously not true, then we can say that it's not just genetics that is causing women to choose soyboys.

Let's say there are 2 identical genetic potential men. One gobbles up soy, has feminine mannerisms, and wears makeup (seriously?). One eats meat, eggs, and veg, has masculine mannerisms, and laughs at environmentalists. Why would a woman choose the former?
 

wewuzkangzz

 
Banned
Orthodox
The thread is called "why are women willingly choosing soyboys?", and you're saying it's all genetics, right?

This implies that all soyboys have superior genetics yes?

Since this is obviously not true, then we can say that it's not just genetics that is causing women to choose soyboys.

Let's say there are 2 identical genetic potential men. One gobbles up soy, has feminine mannerisms, and wears makeup (seriously?). One eats meat, eggs, and veg, has masculine mannerisms, and laughs at environmentalists. Why would a woman choose the former?
They wouldn't, but no two men are genetically identical.

IMO Genetics is more important to attraction that current socio/cultural trends.

6'4 vegan blue-eyed environmentalist is genetically more desirable for women than a 5'7 meat eating masculine man with mud eyes.

There is nothing soy about protecting your native homelands via environmental cleanliness. In fact, environmentalism has always been a key theme in Nordic cultures.
 

Enoch

Hummingbird
You’re actually going by a notion that women should seek these men because of their looks which supposedly indicate genetic fitness, as if women eighteen to 25 years old generally make proper decisions for one of their most important choices in life for which looks should be of utmost concern: who gets on top of them!
Sending women to college is one of society's most hilarious self owns.
 

inthefade

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
They wouldn't, but no two men are genetically identical.

IMO Genetics is more important to attraction that current socio/cultural trends.

6'4 vegan blue-eyed environmentalist is genetically more desirable for women than a 5'7 meat eating masculine man with mud eyes.

There is nothing soy about protecting your native homelands via environmental cleanliness. In fact, environmentalism has always been a key theme in Nordic cultures.

Are you a robot or something? Did you read what I said?
 

budoslavic

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
My argument is that "soyboy" is a vague term that does not properly assess someone's genetic value.
Do you know what "soyboy" means? It has to do with lack of masculine traits and/or characteristics; it has nothing to do with one's "genetic value". There are many real life examples of "soyboy". Take Justin Trudeau as an example. Does he have masculine traits or not? And why does he always sit like a girl?

DWoJeOSX4AAgUdm.jpg
DMDOVN3VAAAv-BI



Edit. As for the thread title's question, that is a woman's preference. I wouldn't be surprised if they want power & control in a relationship when choosing soyboys with weak masculine traits.
 
Last edited:

Blade Runner

Hummingbird
Orthodox
I don't think most people agree with OP, to be honest. I think that it stands out to people when they perceive a decent looking guy acts feminine and perhaps "gets the girl" even if at least it is short term. That produces a bias. Just like women who desire certain men claim these men go out with uglier women, and men who desire certain women claim they go out with uglier men (than themselves). Does it actually happen a lot? No, you just remember it, and/or are biased in your assessment. The culture of the western world is nonsense at this point, so complaints about faggy men will of course be around, and will repulse many of us.

Make sense? Case closed.
 

Adrian

 
Banned
Orthodox Catechumen
Do you know what "soyboy" means? It has to do with lack of masculine traits and/or characteristics; it has nothing to do with one's "genetic value". There are many real life examples of "soyboy". Take Justin Trudeau as an example. Does he have masculine traits or not? And why does he always sit like a girl?

DWoJeOSX4AAgUdm.jpg
DMDOVN3VAAAv-BI



Edit. As for the thread title's question, that is a woman's preference. I wouldn't be surprised if they want power & control in a relationship when choosing soyboys with weak masculine traits.

Trump subconsciously calling him a p*ssy with the placing of that hand gesture
 
Top