Tigre said:Mentavious said:In terms of skill you must understand that our best athletes don't play soccer. In terms of total athletic ability football is first followed by basketball. Soccer isn't even getting our top 200 athletes coming out of high school in any given year. Imagine if 25% of those kids played soccer with the same intensity of those outside of the US from ages 5-18. It would be a different story.
No, it wouldn't. And yes, one dimensional.
A Barry Sanders type is never going to be an elite tennis player, for example. It's a different skillset. And neither would he be an elite soccer player.
An NFL running back is optimized to a very specialized skillset that doesn't necessarily translate to dominating other sports.
I think that's obvious to anyone who follows different sports and observes that they are suited to different body types.
If you have a hard on for vertical leap and sprint speed and define who are your best athletes only on those metrics, you can expect to see your "best athletes" fail to reach the highest levels at a wide variety of sports.
These guys are two sport athletes. Just because they play professionally in one sport doesn't mean they could not have in another.
It's well known that many football players could of had a shot at basketball professionally.
I'm not seeing where football or basketball athletic skills would not translate into success on the soccer field.
I have a hard time believing a guy who can make it into the NBA, NFL, MLB could not be just as good in soccer if they are to play seriously up until the ages 18-20.