for.petes.sake said:In terms of progressive and economic polices boomers and left-wing millennials are very different. A lot of left wing millennials say that boomer's choices have screwed over millennials but millennials keep choosing to be screwed over.
Here is a vice video of a guy complaining about high rent prices and how to stop it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5xKz5AcuXE
His solution, rent control. Basically severely regulate rent prices. He gives an example of a rent controlled house where the prices have not gone up since the 70s. Never mind the fact this will severely hurt landlords because inflation, demand, and upkeep (because services will increase with inflation). He then states:
SamuelBRoberts said:for.petes.sake said:In terms of progressive and economic polices boomers and left-wing millennials are very different. A lot of left wing millennials say that boomer's choices have screwed over millennials but millennials keep choosing to be screwed over.
Here is a vice video of a guy complaining about high rent prices and how to stop it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5xKz5AcuXE
His solution, rent control. Basically severely regulate rent prices. He gives an example of a rent controlled house where the prices have not gone up since the 70s. Never mind the fact this will severely hurt landlords because inflation, demand, and upkeep (because services will increase with inflation). He then states:
What are some places in the United States where Millennials have successfully advocated for rent control?
RawGod said:Don't forget, white boomers completely and voluntarily made sure their grandchildren would be a minority instead of an 85% majority in the USA. A handover to rival ethnic groups unprecedented in history.
for.petes.sake said:I dont know any place where rent control policies have been successfully implemented but what I do know is that in major leftist areas such the bay area and new York have leftist groups that try to push for more rent control. Actually the video does give an example of a city that implemented rent control but I cant remember the city name and I do not want to watch the video again.
for.petes.sake said:In terms of progressive and economic polices boomers and left-wing millennials are very different. A lot of left wing millennials say that boomer's choices have screwed over millennials but millennials keep choosing to be screwed over.
Here is a vice video of a guy complaining about high rent prices and how to stop it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5xKz5AcuXE
His solution, rent control. Basically severely regulate rent prices. He gives an example of a rent controlled house where the prices have not gone up since the 70s. Never mind the fact this will severely hurt landlords because inflation, demand, and upkeep (because services will increase with inflation). He then states:
"but naturally anything that helps out actual people and takes money out of some rich assholes pockets is going to face a lot of opposition. Critics of URC have said policies like these will disincentive landlords from or staying on top of building upkeep. They've also said it disincentives further real estate development which to me people not wanting to gentrify your neighborhood"
When he was met with valid arguments against UCR his retort was that those are invalid since they would be promoting "gentrification".
Rent is high because of supply and demand. On the supply side we have too many stupid regulation preventing development. Even when they are met if development hurts someones feelings then it can still get shut down (here is a video showing how development gets stopped in San Francisco because of gentrification
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExgxwKnH8y4)
On the demand side, stupid progressive polices like mass immigration has brought in thousands of people who are now competing for these housing units. Yet the millennial blames the economics and not his own stupid progressive ways.
Lampwick said:I reject the entire frame of these generational debates.
The people to blame are the ultra-rich, not grandma and grandpa who bought their house back in the 60s for $10k. They simply got lucky.
BortimusPrime said:Lampwick said:I reject the entire frame of these generational debates.
The people to blame are the ultra-rich, not grandma and grandpa who bought their house back in the 60s for $10k. They simply got lucky.
It's really more of a tragedy of the commons problem. Politicians pander to the largest voting bloc by protecting the entitlement programs that benefit them.
The obnoxious aspect of the boomers isn't really anything they individually did, it's more their tendency to take credit for the cushy time and place they were born into and then carp about younger generations being no good. Like with education: every time I've heard about a boomer's college experience it involved plenty of partying or dithering around, yet they ended up doing fine even with a froofy humanities degree. But this day in age when a Millennial does the same thing and gets a silly degree he'll be fucked up the ass and suddenly it's bad character and all his fault for poor decision-making.
Reminds me of the NPC meme.Sherman said:The thing many are missing when they try to understand the 1960s, is how little control most people actually have over their own minds. I still remember when the hippies came out, the construction workers hated the hippies and would beat them up. In merely one or two years later, the same construction workers were wearing long hair down to their waistes and smoking pot. The reality is that it was a very small group of manipulators supported by the media that changed the entire society. People are herd animals and easy to manipulate. It's like blaming a robot for its role in assembling a car. The manipulators don't get blamed because they remain invisible. It all looks spontaneous and supports the illusion of free will.
MrLemon said:Again I'm a boomer (on the younger side, not a straight hippy but knew a lot of them). It's my group and I've watched them my whole life.
Boomers are 180 degrees opposite of the World War 2 generation. The WW2 people would do what it took, sacrifice their lives as needed, to give their children a better life.
Boomers would sacrifice their children's future to indulge themselves, then make up some BS reasons why it's the right thing. They are the most narcissistic group of humans ever to have lived. Ever.
Don't tell me: "oh, they're misunderstood". That's bullshit. They are easy to understand. They are selfish narcissistic assholes. Sure, brilliant and successful in their prime, and created a lot of amazing things, but now that they're getting old, their veneer of success is wearing down and all we see are selfish old fucks grinding their children and grandchildren into dirt poverty to feed their massive egos.
Of course they will win. Their kids don't have the numbers or the balls to resist them. After the last of the boomers die, the kids will be standing in a wasteland, looking at burned-out factories and ghettos, gated communities where the billionaire's have separated from the commoners. The middle class gone. Police and government owned by the rich and the corporations. The dreams of a healthy futuristic middle-class society, the dreams of the post-WW2 generation, destroyed - not - by any external foe, but by the greed and degradation of the boomers.
The kids of the boomers will have to fix it somehow. Or it collapses and we end up in a new Great Depression and war.