Why Don't Feminists and the MSM Go After Porn?

gework

Ostrich
Gold Member
Over the last few years the MSM and feminists have been fervently combing the west, looking under ever rock in the hope of finding that which they claim to hope do not exist: sexists, racists, homopbobes, transphobes etc. There's also been a rise to prominence of witch hunts for minor issues and made-up issues, like manspreading and mansplaining.

Why don't these same people ever seem to criticise pornography in which women are routinely dominated, choked, spanked; then held down as they get their faces sprayed?
 

Syberpunk

Pelican
Gold Member
 

RatInTheWoods

Hummingbird
Gold Member
I've seen plenty of feminist hate against porn.

But its not as prevalent as manspreading coverage, you are right.

It's like rape culture and mass importation of actual rapists doesn't get a mention either.

They be a strange lot these feminists...
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
The Jewish Connection(tm) exists but it doesn't go on to explain why the harpy-on-the-street doesn't go apeshit about porn the way she does about things as trivial as manspreading.

I stated some time ago that these bitches inherently sense when a thing is too large for them to take a swipe at.

Porn falls into that field, as does islam. The guy on the 99b that refuses to close his legs like he's wearing a skirt? Not so much.

Take on islam or porn and you're going to get steamrolled. They're not easy targets, and women are nothing if not reliably gutless.
 

Super_Fire

Kingfisher
I'd say there's also a "pacifist" angle, in that women would rather their man watch porn and be pacified than to go out and cheat.

The hierarchy of acceptability would then go:

1. Porn and wank at home (Best)

2. Prostitutes (Don't ask, don't tell)

3. Mistress (No-go)
 
From what I remember, there are certain brands of feminism that went after porn at one time or another. i suppose that once porn bled into every corner of society and became unstigmatized it was only a matter of time before every type of imaginable fetish porn became available...so Fat Blue Haired Fart Porn existing probably is something they probably like. I think most of these types probably feel more at ease when everyone else is just as dysfunctional and twisted as they are.


Leonard D Neubache said:
The Jewish Connection(tm) exists but it doesn't go on to explain why the harpy-on-the-street doesn't go apeshit about porn the way she does about things as trivial as manspreading.

I stated some time ago that these bitches inherently sense when a thing is too large for them to take a swipe at.

Porn falls into that field, as does islam. The guy on the 99b that refuses to close his legs like he's wearing a skirt? Not so much.

Take on islam or porn and you're going to get steamrolled. They're not easy targets, and women are nothing if not reliably gutless.


It just shows how cynical feminists are with their objectives. They don't really have objectives, per se...only to destroy what they see as the 'status quo'. What that means changes on a dime which is of course the point. This sort of shit seems to grease the wheels in their efforts to beguile most blue pill men.

Back when feminists had nothing better to bitch about, they did bitch about porn. They're not harping on it now because they've got bigger fish to fry...like killing their unborns and wishing they could kill every cis het white male.
 

redpillage

Ostrich
Gold Member
gework said:
Over the last few years the MSM and feminists have been fervently combing the west, looking under ever rock in the hope of finding that which they claim to hope do not exist: sexists, racists, homopbobes, transphobes etc. There's also been a rise to prominence of witch hunts for minor issues and made-up issues, like manspreading and mansplaining.

Why don't these same people ever seem to criticise pornography in which women are routinely dominated, choked, spanked; then held down as they get their faces sprayed?

They won't go after p0rn for various reasons already outlined above. But they most vehemently go after prostitution and constantly push to keep it illegal or make it so in the places where it's not. Ask yourself why ;-)
 
gework said:
Over the last few years the MSM and feminists have been fervently combing the west, looking under ever rock in the hope of finding that which they claim to hope do not exist: sexists, racists, homopbobes, transphobes etc. There's also been a rise to prominence of witch hunts for minor issues and made-up issues, like manspreading and mansplaining.

Why don't these same people ever seem to criticise pornography in which women are routinely dominated, choked, spanked; then held down as they get their faces sprayed?
Because the same tribe of people who own the MSM and most financial companies also run pornography. Porn is intentional cultural subversion on that particular tribe's part.
 
Constitution45 said:
Wasn't there a psyop by the Israeli government back in the 90s, were they broadcasted free pornography into Palestinian homes ?
Potentially a myth but it wouldn't surprise me.
Yes, it happened:
Porn movies and programmes in Hebrew are being broadcast by Israeli troops who have taken over three Palestinian television stations of Ramallah, irate residents of the besieged West Bank town said on Saturday.

The offices of three local television and radio stations were occupied by soldiers on Friday morning, a few hours after tanks and hundreds of troops stormed the town in Israel's biggest offensive against the Palestinian Authority and its leader Yasser Arafat.

The soldiers started broadcasting the porn clips - considered extremely offensive by most Muslims - intermittently on Saturday afternoon from the Al-Watan, Ammwaj, and Al-Sharaq channels, the residents said.

"The pornographic movies started on Al-Watan television at around 03:30," one 34-year-old Palestinian mother named Reema said.

"I have six children at home, they have nowhere to go with what is going on here and can't even watch TV," she said angrily.

"It's not healthy really. I think the Israelis want to mess with our young men's heads," she said.
https://www.news24.com/xArchive/Archive/Porn-the-new-weapon-of-choice-20020330
 

Rotten

Robin
Cultural Marixism is all about wrecking the lives of your enemies, causing misery, and making them fight each other so that you can rule over them despite being a minority.

Feminists promote man hating and pornographers dish out many harmful blue pills.

Women and men poisoned by feminism and blue pills can't have normal healthy functional relationships.

Meanwhile, The same feminists and pornographers belong to the same religion, converse in the same social circles, and send their children to the same schools. Feminists will never go after pornographers and they even ostracize women, such as church ladies, who agree with them on every issue but want to go after the pornographers.
 

C-Note

Ostrich
Gold Member
Porn causes problems for the feminist movement. Like transgenderism, some feminists are against it and some are pro. So, when they publicly fight about it, it causes them immensely bad publicity.

I can't find any articles about it now (I suspect they've been scrubbed from the Internet) but a few years ago the SJWs who run the Wikimedia organization (which operates Wikipedia) held a conference about women and the Internet. A feminist, pro-porn presenter who I believe was also a columnist for the Daily Dot asked to give a presentation on women and Internet erotic art. When the conference organizers found out what the presentation was about at the last minute, they canceled it and kicked her out of the conference, saying that the content could "trigger" some of the attendees. The presenter's friends at the Daily Dot were really angry about it and wrote a couple of articles highly critical of Wikimedia and its commitment to women's issues, pointing out the hypocrisy among other things of how much porn is hosted on Wikimedia Commons (Wikipedia's image database). I don't know about now, but the Daily Dot used to be a moderately influential voice on the liberal side of the Internet.
 

debeguiled

Peacock
Gold Member
Women love porn. Women are fascinated by sex. They think about it all the time. All of them imagine being so desirable they could make a living at it.

I once even heard on The View, Whoopie Goldberg talking about how she always made her own money and never had to make it on her back.

Men don't think like this. If men can't get a job, they don't think, oh well, guess I gotta go hangout on Polk Street in San Francisco in hot pants sucking on a lollipop.

Even when they claim to be against it, they are totally getting off on talking about it. Most of them anyway.

Some of the hardcore feminists are truly anti sex.

All the others are just diddling in their minds.

I love this old school feminist movie from the 70's supposedly against porn.

All of the feminists in this movie talk and act like they are about as wet as a UK spring.

 

Wutang

Hummingbird
Gold Member
The second wave feminists from the 80s and 90s were vehemently against porn and sex work, seeing it as exploitative and dehumanizing towards women. The third wave feminists we see right now (the blue hair Tumblr types) have a more schizo attitude towards it: one moment they'll be talking about how empowering being a stripper or porn star is and in the very same breath they'll be complaining about how some video game character having breasts is demeaning towards women. I give the former type of feminist points for consistency at least.
 

debeguiled

Peacock
Gold Member
Wutang said:
The second wave feminists from the 80s and 90s were vehemently against porn and sex work, seeing it as exploitative and dehumanizing towards women. The third wave feminists we see right now (the blue hair Tumblr types) have a more schizo attitude towards it: one moment they'll be talking about how empowering being a stripper or porn star is and in the very same breath they'll be complaining about how some video game character having breasts is demeaning towards women. I give the former type of feminist points for consistency at least.

The problem with being against porn is that they all claim to be all about female empowerment, so it is pretty hypocritical to start telling other women what they can and cannot do.

The only way out of this dilemma is the claim that they know the minds of porn actresses better than the porn actresses know their own minds, and that they have internalized their oppression, which again is pretty condescending if you claim to care about the empowerment of women.
 
C-Note said:
Porn causes problems for the feminist movement. Like transgenderism, some feminists are against it and some are pro. So, when they publicly fight about it, it causes them immensely bad publicity.

I can't find any articles about it now (I suspect they've been scrubbed from the Internet) but a few years ago the SJWs who run the Wikimedia organization (which operates Wikipedia) held a conference about women and the Internet. A feminist, pro-porn presenter who I believe was also a columnist for the Daily Dot asked to give a presentation on women and Internet erotic art. When the conference organizers found out what the presentation was about at the last minute, they canceled it and kicked her out of the conference, saying that the content could "trigger" some of the attendees. The presenter's friends at the Daily Dot were really angry about it and wrote a couple of articles highly critical of Wikimedia and its commitment to women's issues, pointing out the hypocrisy among other things of how much porn is hosted on Wikimedia Commons (Wikipedia's image database). I don't know about now, but the Daily Dot used to be a moderately influential voice on the liberal side of the Internet.
I read a few studies/articles a few years ago (haven't been able to find them since) that showed that porn users were more likely to support all sorts of leftist causes: multiculturalism, feminism, homosexuality, etc. Porn is a psyop against the West.
 
Top