Why Don't Feminists and the MSM Go After Porn?

Going strong

Crow
Gold Member
Because (among other reasons described in previous posts) modern porn is obviously used to foster and promote the mixing of races (especially Black-White), and homosexuality. That's one of the reasons why the Establishment, MSM and Soros - and their foot soldiers (the feminists) - broadcast or finance as much porn as they can.
If porn were showing only same-race (or possibly White-Asian, a combination that infuriates "Liberal" White females) heterosexual couples, then it would be demonized and prohibited by the Establishment.
 

EndsExpect

Kingfisher
gework said:
Over the last few years the MSM and feminists have been fervently combing the west, looking under ever rock in the hope of finding that which they claim to hope do not exist: sexists, racists, homopbobes, transphobes etc. There's also been a rise to prominence of witch hunts for minor issues and made-up issues, like manspreading and mansplaining.
Why don't these same people ever seem to criticise pornography in which women are routinely dominated, choked, spanked; then held down as they get their faces sprayed?

I had this exact conversation with a black feminist who is in the BLM movement. She is attending lawschool and we got to talking about politics and shit... she was so interested in my opinion despite the fact that she hated some of it... that she talked to me for 3 hours straight outside a coffee shop. Very attractive girl of Ethiopian descent.

She was not particularly bothered by women choosing to do porn. When I pointed out that most of those girls are exploited and come from broken homes she wavered quite a bit.

I will tell you what did drive her nuts. Interracial Raceplay Porn. She was absolutely disgusted by this. This was something that drove a wedge between her and Non-Ethiopian black men. Evidently had a AfAm ex/BF who was into this raceplay shit. She watched some of it and was really disgusted... said the black guys were treated like animals and the women degraded and humiliated. Could not understand why her exBF was not equally offended. I pointed out that he was getting off on being objectified as animalistic and racially humiliating a woman. I swear she almost vomited thinking about that.

Also my cousin has this roommate that is a "Male Feminist". A year after this conversation with the BLM girl, I was joking with my cousin about porn. His roommate pops off with "I exclusively watch interracial cuckold porn". Now this is a super liberal white guy, so I asked him if he imagined himself to be the black guy and he said No. So, I asked if he fantasized about his GF being banged by some huge dick black guy while his manhood is ridiculed and humiliated. He said not really. At that point he kind of looked lost and said... he fantasized about being the woman. :gay:

I've known this guy for 15 years... and before he was straight as an arrow. Now he wants to suck big dicks and have shit shoved up his ass. I want to say that the porn is to blame... but I think it's more likely that the liberal politics changed him first.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Debeguiled, I disagree about women being susceptible to porn in the same manner men are. If that were the case, you wouldn't have women being outnumbered 50 to 1 on cheating sites like Ashley Madison, and men and women would be sleeping together at the same rates as gay males, in parks and bars all over the place. The most sexual women I've dated would go to sites like nerve.com or read erotica, but they didn't have male-like porn habits.

There is a bit less of an imbalance today with a segment of younger women in western/blue state metropoles, but these women have been completely conditioned.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Super_Fire said:
Because pornography is cultural subversion perpetrated by their financial backers, the Jews.

The sexual liberation movement is tied up with women's rights, abortion, porn, etc. All forms of political mind control to drive people away from healthy relationships, family, and Christendom.

Agree completely.

E. Michael Jones, who is referred to in Tomtud's video above, has done the most definitive and penetrating analysis on the subject of pornography as powerful tool for psychological warfare and political control in his book "Libido Dominandi", perhaps the finest work ever on the subject of sexual revolution.


http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/1999/libido_ad.html
 

questor70

Ostrich
The anti-slut hamster will always produce a cognitive-dissonance with slut-walks and slutty pop-stars seen as female empowerment while simultaneously attacking men for wanting to pump-and-dump.

Another way of saying this is they really want to be loved for who they are inside, but they don't want to earn it (with poise, charm, modesty, charity). It's all about entitlement and being lazy. They'd rather slut around and gather up a lot of male gaze and then expect men to magically appreciate their deeper qualities. You can think of this as the reverse of the delusion of the beta thinking the friendzone can eventually earn him pussy--only when women don't get their way they don't sulk, they start hashtag movements.
 

debeguiled

Peacock
Gold Member
911 said:
Debeguiled, I disagree about women being susceptible to porn in the same manner men are. If that were the case, you wouldn't have women being outnumbered 50 to 1 on cheating sites like Ashley Madison, and men and women would be sleeping together at the same rates as gay males, in parks and bars all over the place. The most sexual women I've dated would go to sites like nerve.com or read erotica, but they didn't have male-like porn habits.

There is a bit less of an imbalance today with a segment of younger women in western/blue state metropoles, but these women have been completely conditioned.

I didn't mean to imply they have the same habits as men when it comes to porn. I just meant they think about sex a lot. Even if they did have the same urges when it comes to porn, they still have societal pressures to say they don't like it.

I was using the documentary I posted as example of women getting all hot about sex and sex work, but they can't come out and be honest, they have to do it in the context of a film that criticizes it.

Just fruity girl thinking.
 

Going strong

Crow
Gold Member
Note also that porn, scandalously, has one main target: children. Considering that almost all children of the world are now exposed to relentless porn (through internet).
Porn therefore is used by the "pizzagate Uncle-Biden-Podesta" Establishment, to sexualize and corrupt kids, and ultimately bring them (willingly, in a way) to their spirit-cooking (or similar evil stuff) parties.

Don't doubt for one instant that pedos and gays use porn to corrupt the minds of the next generation and get new young asses to sodomize.
 

Super_Fire

Kingfisher
911 said:
Super_Fire said:
Because pornography is cultural subversion perpetrated by their financial backers, the Jews.

The sexual liberation movement is tied up with women's rights, abortion, porn, etc. All forms of political mind control to drive people away from healthy relationships, family, and Christendom.

Agree completely.

E. Michael Jones, who is referred to in Tomtud's video above, has done the most definitive and penetrating analysis on the subject of pornography as powerful tool for psychological warfare and political control in his book "Libido Dominandi", perhaps the finest work ever on the subject of sexual revolution.


http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/1999/libido_ad.html

Exactly; E. Michael Jones is the foremost mind speaking this today and is the rightful leader to the anti-Judaism movement, if there is such a thing.

You start by listening to Jordan Peterson and his defense of Logos, vis a vie the attacks on it by the Cultural Marxists (Jacque Derrida, Michel Foucault) or Jon Rappaport and his talks of the Individual vs. the False Collective, but neither one is willing to name the elephant in the room.

That's when you step up to the plate and listen to what Jones has to say. That is, that the battle of Logos (Christ) vs. Anti-Logos (Judaism) has been the most important struggle in the West over the past 2,000 years, ever since Jesus confronted the Pharisees.
 

puckerman

Ostrich
I didn't know that feminists weren't going after porn. They have managed to get a lot of porn outlawed in Canada, as well as other countries. Many of these feminist freaks call pornography "violence against women" and other nonsense. We are already seeing the impact in laws against revenge porn, which should be a CIVIL matter, not a criminal one. We don't even need laws against revenge porn anyway. A woman can already sue the man because he has posted her photograph without her permission. That is how revenge porn should be handled.
 

Transsimian

Ostrich
Gold Member
Say what you like, but Australian porn is worse.

 

ElFlaco

Kingfisher
Gold Member
Wutang said:
The second wave feminists from the 80s and 90s were vehemently against porn and sex work, seeing it as exploitative and dehumanizing towards women.

Yes. Some feminists have targeted porn, just not this generation of feminists.

The most prominent anti-porn feminist was Andrea Dworkin. (Not posting her photo; ugly beyond imagination. Among her claims: the idea that all penetrative sex is rape. Her 'husband' celebrated the limp penis.) Dworkin and her colleagues had some legal successes in restricting pornography.

In the 1980s, there was a debate within feminism called the 'sex wars', pitting pro-sex feminists (embracing porn, sex work, bdsm, even pedophilia) against the anti-sex crusaders.
 

Samseau

Owl
Gold Member
Some classical feminists have also been pro-porn, such as Pagalia. Most classical feminists, however, claim porn objectifies women in the worst way. They are against modeling and anything else that celebrates the female form.

Feminism is still evil though, since it replaces worship of sexuality with worship of money. Everything about first and second wave feminism is about how women can make more money to compete with men.
 

puckerman

Ostrich
Samseau said:
Some classical feminists have also been pro-porn, such as Pagalia. Most classical feminists, however, claim porn objectifies women in the worst way. They are against modeling and anything else that celebrates the female form.

Feminism is still evil though, since it replaces worship of sexuality with worship of money. Everything about first and second wave feminism is about how women can make more money to compete with men.

Most feminists--especially Gloria Steinem--have called Camille Paglia "anti-feminist."
 
Wendy McElroy is a libertarian (and usually a fairly thought-provoking thinker and writer), and also seems to identify as "feminist".

I've never much looked into what she meant by that, because I enjoy her writing on politics and economics and culture.

Here is her essay on why she supports porn: http://www.wendymcelroy.com/freeinqu.htm

(can't give a summary cos I haven't read it past the first paragraph, but maybe those interested in this thread will find something worth discussion)
 

questor70

Ostrich
Mercenary said:
puckerman said:
They have managed to get a lot of porn outlawed in Canada, as well as other countries.


But in Canada the supreme court said it's ok to have (most types of) sex with an animal.

I think bestiality is now an acceptable lifestyle choice for women courtesy of SJWs, even if you kindap a monster and stick him in your bathtub to use as a sex-slave.


I fuck monsters because reasons.

 
Top