Why Don't Feminists and the MSM Go After Porn?

Leonard D Neubache said:
The Jewish Connection(tm) exists but it doesn't go on to explain why the harpy-on-the-street doesn't go apeshit about porn the way she does about things as trivial as manspreading.

I stated some time ago that these bitches inherently sense when a thing is too large for them to take a swipe at.

Porn falls into that field, as does islam. The guy on the 99b that refuses to close his legs like he's wearing a skirt? Not so much.

Take on islam or porn and you're going to get steamrolled. They're not easy targets, and women are nothing if not reliably gutless.

Of course feminists are against porn or many are, but attacking porn goes counter the wishes of their masters, so all campaigns get zero backing from above and thus go nowhere.


The thing is that porn does the following for the elite:

+ it sucks the male energies dry - more porn equals less protesting and dealing with the real issues at hand
+ it lowers male testosterone - always a good thing for the elite
+ it decreases the actual desire and frequency of having sex even when they have a partner which decreases population growth
+ it gives men an outlet for their drives and lets them be together with shrieking fat feminist bitches longer than they otherwise would be - in fact the contrary to feminist thinking is true - it does not raise their standards, it actually lowers them since they can get their beauty kicks from porn while having mediocre sex with their fatties
+ it changes the very balance of the brain and works later as a kind of placating SOMA/drug for all positive male endeavors - that is why those who practice nofap report an increase in all positive activities, increase in real sex and a far more active lifestyle

Thus porn is a very valuable tool. Back when the internet started in the 1990s those that observed things also saw all the newscasters on TV talk of how much porn there is on the internet. They talked in a disgusted concerned manner, but all of this was planted so that as many men as possible would get online. It was deliberate.

So remember gents - the feminists will only be able to go through the agenda points that are in tune with their masters and creators. If the globalists wanted feminism gone, then it would not last 1 year before most women would be disavowing it and were going back to the 1950s (for example in the case of an Alien invasion and the need for billions of strong masculine women and cannon fodder - feminism could not be afforded then).
 

Grodin

Woodpecker
The internet made porn a fact of life... has nothing to do with feminists

Lots of feminist prudes would love to outlaw pron but it's too easily distributed

Passionate non-contractual sex is much harder to find on the internet so they've gone after that instead
 

Easy_C

Crow
All of the dudes in this thread cheering sexbots because sexbots will finally upend the power women have...


Read this thread. You're falling right into the damn trap they've set for you and cheering it the whole way.
 

PharaohRa

Kingfisher
The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

Btw, with respect to porn, sexbots, etc., sooner or later men will tire of it because nothig beats the real thing.
 
PharaohRa said:
The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
TigerMandingo said:
PharaohRa said:
The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.

To add to this: Porn also has a HUGE gay following and presence. Feminists attacking porn would mean insulting their gay "besties." A lot of gay men lead porn-driven lives.

This isn't just because of online porn. I discovered this in college. Before the Internet, gay guys used the bathrooms in the Fine Arts Building as jerk-off stations and used to leave their disgusting gay hardcore mags with titles like Honcho on top of the sinks.

My friends and I made it a point to trek over to the University Center when nature was calling.
 

Brother Abdul Majeed

Kingfisher
Gold Member
TigerMandingo said:
PharaohRa said:
The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.

Feminists have painted themselves into a corner with the theory of "intersectionality". This is why they manufacture rape claims against "frat boys".
 
Brother Abdul Majeed said:
TigerMandingo said:
PharaohRa said:
The feminists do not attack the porn industry because (((they))) butter their bread. Nuff said.

I wonder if feminists don't go after Rap music for the same reason. Or better yet, it's probably because attacking rap would be considered racist.

Feminists have painted themselves into a corner with the theory of "intersectionality". This is why they manufacture rape claims against "frat boys".

Yes - attacking rap would be seen as attacking an "oppressed" minority.

Though I think that rap is also supported by the elite and there are quite a few strong connections to the entire gangsta-culture created with some shady government agencies being involved similar to the Flower Power drug hippie culture in the 1960s.

There are even some black rappers who have expressed those concerns in the past:


Thus attacking rap would not be condoned from above.

----

The same is happening with the rape culture bullshit. Feminists have trouble accusing the lowly ghetto black despite the fact that many rapes are done exactly by that group.
Thus the white frat boy is the face of true evil.

But there is a caveat to that - as soon as the black guy reaches fame, wealth or success, then he is equated with a white man and can equally easy be vilified or slandered - or falsely accused of rape. His wealth negate his former oppressed status and elevate him to a stage so that woman can now freely spout their bullshit about him.
 

blck

Pelican
Gold Member
MSM & Feminists will never attack porn for only one good reason:
"Women masochistic biological needs for any form of "violence" applied to them to be satisfied" if they're not you'll find them self destruct [NSFW] in the name of any kind of bullshit possible

Porn is the only medium that offer staged violence against women without the cons of "real" violence and Porn sites stats are good proofs about that: (click on pic for more insights)

If you find yourself asking a significant panel of women why they love Rough Porn so much none of them will be able to answer you but the facts are here:
Their guts will tie in knots, their pussies will open like flowers in need of water watching any hardcore porn scenes, Feminists Belle Knox or Annabel Chong and many others are proof that porn is at least equally useful for women as it is for men if not more.

Each time it's better to have the words of women to corroborate those allegations but I don't have any right now.
 

Easy_C

Crow
Second thought...

The other reason that most feminists don't go after porn is that they're reactive idiots who simply emote in reponse to whatever they're told to be angry about.

They aren't told to be angry about porn by the hive mind, so they don't go after porn.
 

godfather dust

Ostrich
Gold Member
Feminism is not about equality or empowering women. The top feminists are mostly ugly beasts who have never gotten a proper fucking. It's about hurting men.

Porn is as damaging to men as hard drugs and much more widely used. Feminists don't attack porn because it gives women the upper hand.
 

infowarrior1

Hummingbird
There are feminists that go after porn the sex-negative feminists that consider sex as rape.

Sex-positive feminists meanwhile are for porn. And they prevailed.

Fundamentally evil premises to deal a real problem results in evil solution. That is no solution at all.
 

Paracelsus

Crow
Gold Member
Feminism, like communism and socialism, has doublethink inherent to its nature. Or rather, flat out hypocrisy.

Feminism likes the idea of porn because women make more money than men in that industry. That's because more heterosexual men buy porn than heterosexual women, full stop; the degenerate dollar plays into this in that gay porn is a thing, but porn depends mostly on heterosexually-oriented people because the degenerates are ultimately a fraction of the population.

But feminism also hates the idea of porn because woman don't keep the money they make in porn, and they don't make the money for very long. The reasons for those phenomena are simple: almost without exception, the average female IQ that tends to go into porn as a job is on the left side of the bell curve, has poor impulse control, and usually has a shitload of other issues ranging from early childhood abuse through to absent fathers through to generalised exposure to Western culture that cause them to take that step. It's also why few female porn producers make any money - female porn producers don't tend to come from outside the industry, they tend to ream out their vaginas in the industry before deciding that maybe getting behind the camera is the better deal. As such they're not the brightest businesswomen.

And finally, being a mindset generated in the narcissistic West, feminism is a lot better at saying it's against something rather than for something. Christianity is (at least for the moment) against pornography. Therefore feminism can't be seen to be against it as well, because feminism is opposed to Christianity.
 

questor70

Ostrich
Some do go after porn, sort of. For instance, CNN has goosed its ratings via Lisa Ling "covering" every conceivable sexual kink and fetish.


All in the interest of "serious journalism", of course.

She covered swingers and furries with a tolerant slant but here it's negative.
 

Sooth

Pelican
Gold Member
Because they are on the same team.

Ultimately they all take pleasure in vandalising the holy and sacrosanct. Some do it deliberately, most know not what they do.
 
questor70 said:
She covered swingers and furries with a tolerant slant but here it's negative.

From the article:
Porn has always been around; researchers believe they've found explicit material dating back to the Stone Age.
In the past, however, it took effort to access porn -- whether it was explicit artwork, a private magazine subscription, an X-rated television channel or a store that sold sex-related paraphernalia.

I wonder how Stone Age magazines and TV looked like. "PlayGrug"?
 

Easy_C

Crow
Is there any wonder on this with the way consciousness has shifted?

Feminism is REACTIONARY. That means a movement that functions largely by screeching in response to their trigger phrases, with a manufactured consensus about what’s bad disseminated by the usual media outlets.

Basically feminists are the cat and the media is holding the laser pointer.

So of course they won’t get bad at porn. The people who hold the metaphorical laser pointer also are using porn as a weapon so they’re never going to point it that way. If anything they’ll point it at those who attack porn as we’re seeing by this no nut reaction.
 

Dr. Howard

Peacock
Gold Member
gework said:
The left is now full-on pro-porn. It's mandatory.


The fact that people are actually angry about this and trying to counter signal it, shows their cards.

If a person said "I think I'm going to quit drinking" no would come out publicly and say "Look at all of these losers not drinking! Get down to the liquor store now incels! "
 
Top