Why Don't Feminists and the MSM Go After Porn?

SlickyBoy

Hummingbird
Feminists have twisted the term "equality" so remarkably that I'm surprised Orwell didn't have something to say about in 1984. Nonetheless, the relationship between Winston and Julia is remarkable in context of today's dating culture.

Oh, but feminists have something to say about HIM today.

Winston learns from Julia that ‘[a]ll the workers in Pornosec’, where cheap pornography is made for the proles, ‘except for the head of department, were girls’ (137). ‘The theory was that men, whose sex instincts were less controllable than those of women, were is greater danger of being corrupted by the filth they handled’ (137). This adheres to a view that women are just “naturally” less interested in sex than men, also perpetuated when we are told that ‘so far as the women were concerned, the Party’s efforts [to dirty and distort the sex instinct] were largely successful’ (69).

And to an earlier comment, I wouldn't be so quick to judge the likelihood of a woman to watch rape fantasy porn based upon how she looks. The 50 Shades series of books went into great detail over such scenes and sold well over 100 million copies before the film version came out.

That kind of popularity plus the majority of rape porn watching being done by women means there's more afoot here than the most obviously damaged women running off the rails. The social engineering runs deep.
 
Oh, but feminists have something to say about HIM today.
And to an earlier comment, I wouldn't be so quick to judge the likelihood of a woman to watch rape fantasy porn based upon how she looks. The 50 Shades series of books went into great detail over such scenes and sold well over 100 million copies before the film version came out.

That kind of popularity plus the majority of rape porn watching being done by women means there's more afoot here than the most obviously damaged women running off the rails. The social engineering runs deep.

Much thanks for the link. Quite amusing. (Read about half so far) Much of it is incorrect such as the author claims that Winston didn't have an intellectual relationship with Julia (he did and the books goes into it in detail.)

What Orwell claims in the character of Julia that turned out to be true in feminism in a western society is that feminists craved the patriarchy. Julia slept around with top party officials (alphas) and would never sleep with a prole. She LIKED the patriarchy just as modern feminism also craves and is utterly dependent upon one form of patriarchy or another.

If we want to look in the opposite direction, consider who rejects modernity and embraces a more traditional freedom? Folks who move out to Alaska and live in the wilderness for example. Yes, there are a few women (usually beyond their marriage years such as a woman hermit in the TV series "Below Zero") but most who reject "The Patriarchy" and go full caveman are men.

I wouldn't call feminism's modern state a form of social engineering but in some ways, more of a mere social collapse and degradation of women as mothers and family supporters to the condition of being consumers and dupes of corporations and leftism. Tearing someone down isn't "engineering" although there is an art to demolition. In general, you just smash a few windows and wait for the elements to kick and for the whole thing to collapse on its own. It took 150 years for western civilization to reach this point.
 

Coja Petrus Uscan

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
Ron Jeremy faces 2000 years in jail, over acusations from 23 women. Not likely that the industry were unaware their star schlub was a serial rapist.


By the looks of him, he will die in prison.

It seems this is where access and adiction to fornication will lead.
 

ginsu

Woodpecker
I haven't read through the entire thread, but my answer to the question is because they love sin. Most people absolutely love sin. They are proud to lie, cheat, fornicate, steal, and many even love the idea of killing those they hate. All of it is rebellion against God Almighty.

I don't think most people are as bad as you describe them here. These traits are mostly reserved for the real leftist nutters and antifa. As for Why msm and feminism is hypocrite, its because their agenda is not what they say it is. Porn helps their agenda which is the deconstruction of western society, so of course they promote it.
 

wannable alpha

Woodpecker
Feminists, MSM and all the conservative, religious organizations have lost the fight against porn. For every argument against porn, the porn industry has a counter-argument ready. They have created all the legal and moral justifications.

This is the problem of democracy and civilized societies. Since violence is not allowed and anybody is allowed to talk i.e. organize; perverts + money = porn and prostitution.

It is interesting to note that the godless, atheist Communist Bloc banned porn and prostitution while the "god-fearing" U.S. and Western Europe allowed those industries to proliferate. And don't tell me about some low-level prostitution in the Soviet and Warsaw Pact countries. It was nothing compared to what was available even back then in the capitalistic West.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
^Not initially, that was more in the middle of the Stalin era. Before that, the Bolsheviks under Lenin-Trotsky heavily promoted sexual degeneracy, hardcore feminism etc as a main tool to subvert and destroy Christian Orthodox society in Russia. The same was true in Bela Kun's Hungary.

Stalin reversed course out of pragmatism, because the Soviet Union was falling apart in the 1930s. He also resurrected nationalism for the same reason.
 

wannable alpha

Woodpecker
I know the first batch of communists in SU were crazy. But even post Stalin in SU and in the Warsaw Pact they kept the degenerates in check.

As soon as communism collapsed the financial elites from WE and NA looted billions while pornographers were able to shoot beautiful and desperate women for peanuts. Czech and Hungary became a big hub for western pornographers. Even today, Russian, Ukrainian, Slovak and Baltic girls flock to these two countries to work in the porn studios of Prague and Budapest.
 

TheFinalEpic

Pelican
Gold Member
I have a personal vendetta against pornography, and have been on the path to eliminating it from my life forever.

To answer the question posed by the OP, I believe that there is massive subversion at play, where any saner society would outcast the producers, stars, and consumers, we have normalised the virus of porn to the point where it's taught in schools. It is - like video games, cheap entertainment, television series, and sportsball - distraction and sedation in its purest form.

The MSM and feminists need sedation to be relevant, otherwise they couldn't exist and be allowed to spew their drivel with people accepting it as fact.

The 'sexual revolution' and 'empowerment' that feminists tout as being the saviour of women is a red herring leading to mass destruction of family units, happiness, and long term creation.

This all serves the cause. Don't get it twisted.

And, leftists are the mass adopters of porn - that's why there's so much degeneracy, such an 'array of sexual orientations' and the like - because they have fallen.
 
I know the first batch of communists in SU were crazy. But even post Stalin in SU and in the Warsaw Pact they kept the degenerates in check.

As soon as communism collapsed the financial elites from WE and NA looted billions while pornographers were able to shoot beautiful and desperate women for peanuts. Czech and Hungary became a big hub for western pornographers. Even today, Russian, Ukrainian, Slovak and Baltic girls flock to these two countries to work in the porn studios of Prague and Budapest.

Because Stalin already had all those who would be potential subversives in the Gulag or mass graves or they fled the Soviet Union. He killed a majority of the Old Bolshevik Party because he doesn't want anyone to supplant him or those who arose his suspicions in other ways. His instinctive revulsion perhaps too.

Also the Bolsheviks purged the Liberals as well.
 
Prague has been a main hub for white slavery since the early middle ages, so it reverted back to its second nature in neoliberal times after 1990. The city was almost built on that trade, which was in tribal hands. That slave trade was so big that the local population became known as "Slavs"...


Not entirely true. Prague was important for slavery only relatively briefly in the 10th century after Magyars invaded Pannonia and the new slave trade route with Eastern Europe was established through Prague. However the famed bishop saint Adalbert of Prague battled furiously against this and slavery was ultimately outlawed.

In Christendom, it was not allowed to have Christians as slaves and as more and more Eastern Europeans christianized (most Slavs accepted Christianity by the 11th century), there were less and less potential slaves from the Eastern Europe and the slave trade moved to the Mediterranean.

In the next centuries, the slave trade was dominated by Italian merchant republic of Venice and Genoa who controlled the Mediterranean and had connections with the Muslim powers. For example they controlled the route from Crimea to Mamluk Egypt, and sold slaves to the Muslims. This is why the Genoese had colonies in Crimea and Feodosia was one of Europe's biggest slave markets. This was not allowed by Christianity but they kept doing it anyway. They were selling slaves to Mamluks who would then use those slaves to fight against the crusaders.

Of course the Jewish merchants were also heavily involved in slavery, but I'm talking about the state powers and their established routes here, the Jewish merchants just jumped on board of the established connections, they were not creating their own routes. I think their influence in the slave trade faded and was almost completely gone in the 12th century, but then rebounded in the modern era with transatlantic slave trade as well as the rise of the Ottoman empire. Basically the Italian city states of Genoa and Venice kept the Jews out for much of the middle ages. Those Italian merchants were not fond of the Jews. In Venice, the Jews had no presence during the middle ages and when they arrived in the 16th century, they were put in the ghetto, the first ghetto in history and from which the name derives. The Jews were much more welcome in the Ottoman empire and as the Ottoman empire grew in importance and the power of Genoa and Venice faded, the Jewish merchants became more important again, and then with the transatlantic trade new opportunities opened for the Jews as well. But in the middle ages, the Jews did not really have much power and influence in Europe.

As for the Slavs, the name Slav has other origins, it was the Westerners who called slaves after Slavs, and not the other way around.
 
Last edited:

Coja Petrus Uscan

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
4.jpeg

EIQH190XYAA-U_E.jpg


8.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Aubert

Chicken
Anyone else have noticed that American is one the most violent and dehumanizing? Chocking, spitting, slapping are more common. And of course verbal abuse.

I have watched pornography from the Czech Republic and it seems like Male-Female relationships are presented in a much more loving, caring manner. This is not an argument for pornography but rather it goes to show how much worst for young people the America style porn be..
 
Top