I'm decidely agnostic. Formerly Christian. Just not socially brazen enough to go full atheism. I haven't been to church in a long time. Am not compelled to go back but would if I were invited by a friend. I also don't drink anymore when I was once formerly religiously alcoholic. Nevertheless, if there's a qualifying social occasion to be in an establishment whose primary purpose is serving drinks, I'll go. i just don't drink.
To me, therapy and religion are the flip side of the same coin. Both are a hot cup of coffee in the morning to quicken the spirit, so to speak, and provide comfort & warmth to smooth the roughened edges of world under mass hypnosis. One likes the idea of God as their arbiter and the other esteems themselves to be their own God, or enlightened self-arbiter.
I reject both premises on their faces but not so loudly and proudly that I'm perceived as unwilling to go along to get along. In other words, I accept the good and bad, if you will, of each. Religion seems to work for many even tho it's painfully obvious most religious ppl struggle with deep rooted issues of insecurity leading to a 'sinful' pattern of duplicitous living. Still, I believe in the inherent good nature in all religious ppl. It's the same w/ those who embrace therapy. I've done both whether by my own free will & volition or by force. I did religion by free will when I discovered the gospels in a period of confinement and then by force when I was married to signal to my [ex] wife that I was one of the good guys. I did therapy for similar reasons either bc it was court ordered or bc I thought somehow I'd find answers there. Answers to problems I created. Answers that were easy to find once I pointed the finger at my own complicity in their design.
The problems w/ both religion and therapy are simple to diagnose bc they're replete across the whole of society, whether religious or in therapy: out of control appetites.
People think existentialism is "body, mind, and soul". It would be better understood as "body", "mind" (which is the soul), and "appetites".
Most ppl, whether in the pews holding onto secretive sin or on a comfy couch holding onto fears, resentments, and guilt are all generally led around by baser lower level appetites. What do most Christians and those in therapy have in common? Both can hardly stand to fast for a day or more. That's the only sign you need that appetites are running the show.
This is contrary to the nature of being human but easy to fall into in a society which compels you to consume, consume, and CONsume some more. So, I'm not mad at either. Both are heavily promoted and both represent the backbone of so called moral imperatives which be-speckle our greater social lexicon.
This thread should be re-titled "why does the pot call the kettle black?"
Finally, if you notice an embedded suggestion that most ppl, whether proponents of religion or therapy, respectively, are slaves to lower appetites, and, that I'm not, it's because I was once was but am actually not anymore. I believe it's bc I'm not a proponent nor an opponent of either.
Jesus can spew me out of his mouth and it's just fine by me in the end times. End times which have no basis for existing in reality. After all, why would this end unless it was intended to end at the hands of ppl who hate the human condition from the start? In both cases, that's the root problem: hatred for the human condition.
Just my 2 cents. Not trying to inflame.