Ironically, I was thinking about this because we are seeing how bad the Woke U.S. Military has gotten. A good example of privileged "minorities" enjoying power in the U.S. Military is this viral video of a Woke Lesbian from last year, which was likely posted elsewhere on this forum somewhere.
Since the Biden Administration has targeted patriotic and Conservative American citizens as "domestic terrorists", what does the Woke soldiers like the one in the above clip think will happen if they were going to go after law abiding U.S. citizens in America, which is the world’s most heavily armed nation? How would a U.S. Military Woke GAE Squad fare against first-world types with a lot more firearms training and experience?
Let’s hope it never comes to that.
Song: "God's Gonna Cut You Down" by Johnny Cash
Another observation, apropos to a breakdown in unit cohesion. Exactly what is the military actually fighting for? Ask any of the Marines I served with way back when and the answer given would be swift, concise, and with conviction. It would essentially be this - Mom, God, and Apple Pie i.e. the normal American way of life. That was uniformly recognized top down by this institution and "affirmed", if you will, constantly. Today, what is it? The true answer underscores a condition that is the opposite of cohesion, and therefore, unit cohesion. Let's take the insufferable "lesbian" above. She "fights" (figuratively of course) for, basically, sex, but, for her own "community" (gays) and basically for herself only. A straight female fights for "women's rights". A "dark green", Black, person fights for BLM. Hispanic people fight for Hispanic interests. And so on and so on.
Things to note. First, we can clearly see what was once a singular and simple motivation to fight is now complex, splintered, and disparate. That alone makes for a breakdown in cohesion by definition. However, it gets worse. All of these subsets are fundamentally at war with the primary demographic that joins the military, which is white men. In fact, as evident from the "lesbian" above, they're entirely and unabashedly open about their intentions to kill such people. Yet, these very same people "serve", as it seems, alongside her? Not only that, but, just like on the outside, all these sub-interest groups might be "united" against whitey, but they're also fundamentally conflicted or, at the very least, competing against each other. That's because, there's an affirmative action/quota lotto, which decides what finite amount of promotions, awards etc gets to go to which under-represented group.
The "woke" Army recruiting advertisements that were ratio'd into oblivion, tells us this story. A female soldier may feel inclined to "fight" for her lesbian, um ah, "parents", but that is, for instance, an abomination of the first order to all Catholic soldiers, both white, black, and Hispanic, and is outright Harem for Muslim soldiers. As you can see, none of these colors mix. Both the Catholics and Muslims will absolutely not fight for this and in fact would, if they could fight against this. See where this has led us?
In fact, there is more of a reason for all of these disparate groups to fight each other than to fight any external enemy not only due to their fundamental differences but, they're more of an immediate threat than anything else. If white males acted rationally consistent with their best interests and well-being they should fight homosexuals and feminists (and everyone else). The reason is simple all of these groups seek to do them harm, and currently doing them harm, so, this is far more of a clear and present danger than anything in existence. But, whether right or not, females perceive white males to be equally an imminent threat too.
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/archetype/WORPKHYKPBF2FJJS33V2LANKCM.jpg)
