"Women with insane dating standards" - if you want the real red pill about this topic it's that they actually don't have any standards. Everything in society acts as a mechanism to cater to the woman's biological prerogative and or sex, and I mean literally everything except for maybe the Church.
What do I mean by this? Everything in modern society (especially the west, but it's intrinsic to society structures in general) acts as a rationalization mechanism to 'preserve' the woman.
What I'm saying won't make any sense if you haven't drowned on red pills for years and years but basically everything in society is geared towards sex, and by extension preserving the woman's 'virginity' and or 'dignity' and or 'ego'. A simple proof is tell a man he's a whore or chad even now or anytime in history and the man doesn't really care. What's the worst thing you can say to a man which would destroy his entire reality? Maybe something like he's 'worthless', or a 'slave' or has no 'future' or something like that possibly maybe, there's not much you can tell a man that would basically destroy his reality. But with girls, anytime in human history if you call her a whore it cuts to her deep. That's why society currently is all the more vile, because no other time in human history have women openly accepted their existential 'worthlessness'.
The point here being that any 'standards' any girl claims is just her parroting back anything society has always told her. Society was structured historically to preserve the dignity of a woman and for men to not just F anything that moves. In reality that's all (sadly because of sin) human civilization is, it's just a series of gatekeeping tools towards procreation. Do I want it to be 'only' that, no. Do I think everyone thinks that, no, but subconsciously they do. Can you have a society not like this, yes. But is society and civilization itself by and large built to gatekeep for sex, yes.
Why is this? Because the jackpot of human existence is procreation, to pass on your genes is (to a a materialist - and all of nature) the only thing that matters ultimately. The jackpot of human existence is this: to live forever. So when monks and priests and religious forgo sex and in effect they are choosing their biological 'death' it is in essence the most difficult thing to do. Ask any man to just become celibate overnight and choose to never marry and to never desire kids ever again - to me (and I believe the vast majority of men) it is one of the hardest things to do, because it is so deeply tied to all of humanity and the self. I'll speak for myself, but I find celibacy to be the hardest thing a man can do in this life, hands down. If I never had to worry about wanting sex and or desiring marriage I can safely say I could 'conquer the world', because when sex is not on your mind, or finding a mate is not on your mind, or family is not on your mind, you can accomplish an insane amount. But it's in reality one of the hardest things to do.
The jackpot of human existence is to live forever, we do this by procreating, it's a pseudo-form of being immortal, but not real immortality. Real immortality is found in eating the Eucharist of Christ Jesus - that is how you live for ever. But procreation is so deeply tied to life itself that it literally structures all of society and all of human civilization is built around either 'banging anything and everything' or 'gatekeeping' and placating to the woman's every need.
Subconsciously you could say all of society is in effect gatekeeping for having sex with women. I actually don't have a problem with society having dignity and respect for the human person and having structures which protect this, there's nothing wrong with that generally, but the problem is society is distorted. Historically it has been structured in such a way to block off 'any' man from banging 'any' girl he wants. The fact remains that sex is subconsciously the strongest urge, by far in my opinion, hands down, what men will do to get sex has historically been men forming armies to invade cities, building technology to impress her, making grand inventions, you name it, men have probably done it in some way shape or form to try to 'get the girl', whether that has been accomplished directly or indirectly.
The reason you can't just bang anything that moves is because we weren't made to do that, but when the society restrictions are built in such a way to where you can't get the most basic urge 'satisfied' then men go gay or go crazy. Were meant to have sex, God made us to have sex and bond with the opposite sex, but under God's laws and conditions, not societies, the big lie is how society has structured the way for men to get sex. The vast majority of women can get sex or a partner at the drop of a hat if they really wanted, they might not get the man they 'want' (the one society tells them they need) but they can get it near instant if they want, the opposite is true for a man, espcially nowadays.
Long sad story short is this: society is built for women and structured in such a way for men to have to play by rules to get laid and marry, almost always has this been and probably always will be, because sex is their prized commodity, and the one thing every man wants. Society isn't going to change, the only thing I would like to see changed is having arranged marriages in the West, that almost won't certainty happen, but the Church needs some kind of courtship program in place, because people are so far gone at this point you have to do something, anything. I don't care if people meet for 'dates', but they have no 'plan' - if the 'date' has no end goal (marriage) then you aren't going about the 'date' right, if you don't intend to marry that girl you don't go on the date, that's how it works.
My point here is that societies gatekeeping is pure insanity and is a lose-lose for men in every way possible, and the only way to counteract this is to create an actual acknowledged gatekeeping within the Church with an end goal of marriage. Because seriously, people think they are 'adult' and can meet up and go on 'dates' and all is well, but dudes end up banging out girls left and right and no one is being held to any standard, the whole sick show continues. All of civilization is structured for the woman ok, this is the bitter black pill if you are a hardcore 'alpha' guy you'll resent that concept and think it's not true but it's the truth. Society is built for women, all of it. Because it's their number one commodity everything is centered around the procreative act. It's either being savages and F-ing anything and everything and everyone (like we currently are now believe it or not all with pseudo-gatekeeping) or it's having some kind of rules in place which acknowledges natural law with the intent being to make families.
Obviously it's something that has to happen with the Church, but the fact of the matter is society was structured to make it so that men were not F-ing any girl they wanted and to restrict 'small armies' (families) from creating 'out tribes'. The 'hardwiring' of human behavior is to protect your family, and when societies and tribes are formed this creates more and more barriers for entry. If the barrier is abandoned (as is the case currently in many ways) - the barrier being arranged marriages - then you have 'out tribes' deflowering daughters and destroying families. The point is you need some barrier to entry, that has been historically arranged marriages, courtship, having an end goal and intent to wed off the 'prize' (the girl). But when the barrier is forgone, then you end up with pseudo-barriers to entry; i.e. false gatekeeping which exploits both parties; i.e. dating. The guise that men and women can just 'hang out' and deny their most fundamental natural urge, an urge which propels all of human civilization forward, yeah good luck with that.
Thinking men and women can just 'hang out' - sure we can do it under social settings, duh, obviously I have no problem just hanging out with a girl. But the lie is the 'dating scene' - for man and woman to not do anything takes a lot of self control for both parties, it's definitely possible, but for pro-longed periods of time is kind of difficult. It's in effect asking them to be nuns and monks, which I have no problem with generally speaking, but the vast majority will fail with the social experiment of dating, and most have. Do I think people can 'hang out' and not have sex, yes, obviously, but many also fail.
A lot of men resent any form of gatekeeping and think arranged marriages would be 'beta' and there's plenty of men who just want to keep banging whatever they wanna bang, by all means go right ahead, its your lost soul, not mine. But on a whole society needs to publicly embrace God and the Church again, and publicly funnel people into arranged marriages. Right now they're funneled into porn. Anytime you don't acknowledge the Creator your living a lie and there is no freedom found outside the Catholic Church, none. You aren't free in this world at all anyways. Look around, how free are you? Not much. Sure, you're free to make certain choices no doubt and I'm not denying free-will, not at all, but the freedom to make militias and real armies is gone, those days are over in the West, the government is so intrinsically tied to all of society and people you could never establish some colony to overtake the U.S., from within that is, not publicly could you do this anyways. Regardless that's not the point as much as it is that there is no outlet for men to make families, only outlets which exaggerate the sexual fantasies and which result in sterility.
At the end of the day any standards she has are just her being a parrot to whatever 'tribe' she belongs. In reality her nature has 0 standards, none, nada, zip, zero. You make her whatever you want her to be, and she knows it, thus the entire stage show of civiizaiton.
What do I mean by this? Everything in modern society (especially the west, but it's intrinsic to society structures in general) acts as a rationalization mechanism to 'preserve' the woman.
What I'm saying won't make any sense if you haven't drowned on red pills for years and years but basically everything in society is geared towards sex, and by extension preserving the woman's 'virginity' and or 'dignity' and or 'ego'. A simple proof is tell a man he's a whore or chad even now or anytime in history and the man doesn't really care. What's the worst thing you can say to a man which would destroy his entire reality? Maybe something like he's 'worthless', or a 'slave' or has no 'future' or something like that possibly maybe, there's not much you can tell a man that would basically destroy his reality. But with girls, anytime in human history if you call her a whore it cuts to her deep. That's why society currently is all the more vile, because no other time in human history have women openly accepted their existential 'worthlessness'.
The point here being that any 'standards' any girl claims is just her parroting back anything society has always told her. Society was structured historically to preserve the dignity of a woman and for men to not just F anything that moves. In reality that's all (sadly because of sin) human civilization is, it's just a series of gatekeeping tools towards procreation. Do I want it to be 'only' that, no. Do I think everyone thinks that, no, but subconsciously they do. Can you have a society not like this, yes. But is society and civilization itself by and large built to gatekeep for sex, yes.
Why is this? Because the jackpot of human existence is procreation, to pass on your genes is (to a a materialist - and all of nature) the only thing that matters ultimately. The jackpot of human existence is this: to live forever. So when monks and priests and religious forgo sex and in effect they are choosing their biological 'death' it is in essence the most difficult thing to do. Ask any man to just become celibate overnight and choose to never marry and to never desire kids ever again - to me (and I believe the vast majority of men) it is one of the hardest things to do, because it is so deeply tied to all of humanity and the self. I'll speak for myself, but I find celibacy to be the hardest thing a man can do in this life, hands down. If I never had to worry about wanting sex and or desiring marriage I can safely say I could 'conquer the world', because when sex is not on your mind, or finding a mate is not on your mind, or family is not on your mind, you can accomplish an insane amount. But it's in reality one of the hardest things to do.
The jackpot of human existence is to live forever, we do this by procreating, it's a pseudo-form of being immortal, but not real immortality. Real immortality is found in eating the Eucharist of Christ Jesus - that is how you live for ever. But procreation is so deeply tied to life itself that it literally structures all of society and all of human civilization is built around either 'banging anything and everything' or 'gatekeeping' and placating to the woman's every need.
Subconsciously you could say all of society is in effect gatekeeping for having sex with women. I actually don't have a problem with society having dignity and respect for the human person and having structures which protect this, there's nothing wrong with that generally, but the problem is society is distorted. Historically it has been structured in such a way to block off 'any' man from banging 'any' girl he wants. The fact remains that sex is subconsciously the strongest urge, by far in my opinion, hands down, what men will do to get sex has historically been men forming armies to invade cities, building technology to impress her, making grand inventions, you name it, men have probably done it in some way shape or form to try to 'get the girl', whether that has been accomplished directly or indirectly.
The reason you can't just bang anything that moves is because we weren't made to do that, but when the society restrictions are built in such a way to where you can't get the most basic urge 'satisfied' then men go gay or go crazy. Were meant to have sex, God made us to have sex and bond with the opposite sex, but under God's laws and conditions, not societies, the big lie is how society has structured the way for men to get sex. The vast majority of women can get sex or a partner at the drop of a hat if they really wanted, they might not get the man they 'want' (the one society tells them they need) but they can get it near instant if they want, the opposite is true for a man, espcially nowadays.
Long sad story short is this: society is built for women and structured in such a way for men to have to play by rules to get laid and marry, almost always has this been and probably always will be, because sex is their prized commodity, and the one thing every man wants. Society isn't going to change, the only thing I would like to see changed is having arranged marriages in the West, that almost won't certainty happen, but the Church needs some kind of courtship program in place, because people are so far gone at this point you have to do something, anything. I don't care if people meet for 'dates', but they have no 'plan' - if the 'date' has no end goal (marriage) then you aren't going about the 'date' right, if you don't intend to marry that girl you don't go on the date, that's how it works.
My point here is that societies gatekeeping is pure insanity and is a lose-lose for men in every way possible, and the only way to counteract this is to create an actual acknowledged gatekeeping within the Church with an end goal of marriage. Because seriously, people think they are 'adult' and can meet up and go on 'dates' and all is well, but dudes end up banging out girls left and right and no one is being held to any standard, the whole sick show continues. All of civilization is structured for the woman ok, this is the bitter black pill if you are a hardcore 'alpha' guy you'll resent that concept and think it's not true but it's the truth. Society is built for women, all of it. Because it's their number one commodity everything is centered around the procreative act. It's either being savages and F-ing anything and everything and everyone (like we currently are now believe it or not all with pseudo-gatekeeping) or it's having some kind of rules in place which acknowledges natural law with the intent being to make families.
Obviously it's something that has to happen with the Church, but the fact of the matter is society was structured to make it so that men were not F-ing any girl they wanted and to restrict 'small armies' (families) from creating 'out tribes'. The 'hardwiring' of human behavior is to protect your family, and when societies and tribes are formed this creates more and more barriers for entry. If the barrier is abandoned (as is the case currently in many ways) - the barrier being arranged marriages - then you have 'out tribes' deflowering daughters and destroying families. The point is you need some barrier to entry, that has been historically arranged marriages, courtship, having an end goal and intent to wed off the 'prize' (the girl). But when the barrier is forgone, then you end up with pseudo-barriers to entry; i.e. false gatekeeping which exploits both parties; i.e. dating. The guise that men and women can just 'hang out' and deny their most fundamental natural urge, an urge which propels all of human civilization forward, yeah good luck with that.
Thinking men and women can just 'hang out' - sure we can do it under social settings, duh, obviously I have no problem just hanging out with a girl. But the lie is the 'dating scene' - for man and woman to not do anything takes a lot of self control for both parties, it's definitely possible, but for pro-longed periods of time is kind of difficult. It's in effect asking them to be nuns and monks, which I have no problem with generally speaking, but the vast majority will fail with the social experiment of dating, and most have. Do I think people can 'hang out' and not have sex, yes, obviously, but many also fail.
A lot of men resent any form of gatekeeping and think arranged marriages would be 'beta' and there's plenty of men who just want to keep banging whatever they wanna bang, by all means go right ahead, its your lost soul, not mine. But on a whole society needs to publicly embrace God and the Church again, and publicly funnel people into arranged marriages. Right now they're funneled into porn. Anytime you don't acknowledge the Creator your living a lie and there is no freedom found outside the Catholic Church, none. You aren't free in this world at all anyways. Look around, how free are you? Not much. Sure, you're free to make certain choices no doubt and I'm not denying free-will, not at all, but the freedom to make militias and real armies is gone, those days are over in the West, the government is so intrinsically tied to all of society and people you could never establish some colony to overtake the U.S., from within that is, not publicly could you do this anyways. Regardless that's not the point as much as it is that there is no outlet for men to make families, only outlets which exaggerate the sexual fantasies and which result in sterility.
At the end of the day any standards she has are just her being a parrot to whatever 'tribe' she belongs. In reality her nature has 0 standards, none, nada, zip, zero. You make her whatever you want her to be, and she knows it, thus the entire stage show of civiizaiton.
Last edited:
to want men to gatekeep them, to protect them, and to be a trusted advisor. In a harem, she's cattle so women prefer marriage where she monopolizes a single man. But since women have led such protected existences throughout history, they lack the ability to make this decision rationally most of the time. As men, project this on them, but the PUAs know better in that "gaming" women works best by short-circuiting their dopamine centers.
