Your Daily White Pill

Actually, I think their fears are valid.

1. If you remove leftist influence from our society, we'll see a "mean reversion" type scenario unfold. There are simply too many unnatural things the left has promoted. For instance, men and women are exactly the same in every conceivable way. Such outrageous and, with emphasis, false claims, require constant and robust propaganda and empowered fanatical supporters. In other words, it takes a lot of infrastructure, if you will, to keep a lie going. On one hand, this seems like a bemouth but on the other, because it requires an immense level of support in order to survive it's actually quite fragile. The moment this infrastructure goes away reality will fill that void instantaneously. It may take a little time for adjustments, but, the process will happen. Reality is on our side, not there's. And a large part of this influence is ardently hostile to Christianity. This is a real factor in the faith crisis we see today, so, if its gone and no one is constantly berating Christianity there will be a resurgence in popularity.

2. As the leftist agenda continues to unfold it engenders a reaction. The RV Forum is a part of this reaction. And I realize that this reaction or backlash or resistance etc seems desperate at the moment and even weak, but, this "reaction" I'm speaking of is actually the red pill process. The red pill is much larger than this forum, in fact, its huge. Once a person is red pilled and they see this thing for what it is they tend to run, not walk, but run in the complete and opposite direction. Big surprise, but grown men playing a perverted game of make-believe who openly state that "...your daughters are kinky" or castrating young children or having sex with children are the very outputs of the left that make for the kind of 180-degree reaction above. Its not so much a question of a fictitious Christian conspiracy to secretly create a Theocracy, rather, its a function of the left's very own agenda and objectives that is creating this condition. Geometrically, 180-degrees from the left leads to God. That's why its common to hear from many people that the Red Pill leads to God. In effect, the left is creating the very thing they fear the most.

I do see all this failing because its always failed and even if that wasn't entirely true, it only takes a cursory examination of the left to see its fatal flaws both ideologically, i.e. only whites can be racists, and practically, i.e. promoting anti-merit. The bemouth I spoke of earlier is large, that much is true, and well organized and financed, but, its incredibly inefficient. And due to technological innovations, censorship notwithstanding is undergoing an existential disruption, which is why they're doubling down so hard right now.

Remember also that the left is deranged and completely off the hook right now. The bar is set very low for what they think qualifies as a "Christain white supremacist" nation. For instance, if it becomes acceptable to say "all lives matter" is enough for these types to declare the theocracy is afoot. To be more specific, our country's bedrock was Christian values and morality. That's what they fear. When we come back to that if only as a benchmark that's the "theocracy" they fear the most. No, that's not going to be a kind of "handmadiens tale" or a Sharia law sort of civilization. That will never happen, mostly because that's actually not the intention of the Christian ethos. As stated its more of a function of the red pill dynamic, which again, engenders such a visceral reaction and rejection of leftism, it typically leads the subject to go in the opposite direction and since leftism is the opposite of Christian values, the subject runs back to Christain values. This doesn't necessarily have to require the person to become a practicing Christain or even to become a theist. Stefan Molyneux, for instance, is a well-known atheist, but, he's a "cultural Christain". I'll take that. So from that perspective, I'd say their fears are valid and I think they'll be facing their worse fears quite soon. I have no sympathy for them.
Nope, this is all about pushing the overton window. There will be a reactionary swing back to center but it will end up further to their side than it was on the last swing. This cycle has been going on for a century at least. Think of the 50s-70s which was reacted to by the 80s swing back, a period of some stability for a couple decades, then their feet right back on the gas in the late 2000s till now. Before that the 1920s ended and it swung back during the 30s. Before that... etc. Pretty much for as long as mass media has existed the elites have used it to engineer society to their whims and away from organic european (and now with globalization, human) traditional cultures. I guess a white pill would be to point out that this current "culture" we have is manufactured and implicitly forced upon us, instead of being chosen by us, we merely adapted to it. In a sense it's not real.... but that's more of a metaphysical sense than a de facto sense. De facto it is very real, unfortunately...
 

Dusty

Peacock
Gold Member

Snowflake CEO Says Diversity Goal Is Secondary in Hiring Choices​


Snowflake Inc. Chief Executive Officer Frank Slootman said the cloud software maker needs to focus more on merit when hiring and promoting employees rather than diversity goals, even as it takes steps to boost opportunities for workers.

This is funny though:

McKinsey & Co. that has found that companies with more diverse leadership are more likely to outperform the profitability of those that are the least diverse.

McKinsey found the most gender diverse companies were 25% more likely to have above-average profitability than the least gender diverse group. For ethnic diversity, the gap was 36%.

So I looked up McKinsey’s top leadership (Senior Partners).

35BF29FB-E4E9-4884-97A8-EDC7FCDAAAE5.jpeg42DE72F2-9452-43D0-85DD-A5615058DA7D.jpeg
Looks like all white males except for one white woman and a chinaman.
 
Last edited:
McKinsey found the most gender diverse companies were 25% more likely to have above-average profitability than the least gender diverse group. For ethnic diversity, the gap was 36%.
..and how many of these are government contractors that require diversity or are rewarded lucrative contracts - in other words they are profitable not because of the talent of their 'diverse' leadership but 'diverse' leadership is a requirement for non-competitive contracts and sectors of the economy like wall street - that are regulated and rewarded by the government.
 

Dusty

Peacock
Gold Member
Are you sure they're white?
Some could be Juice.

But , the lack of DIEversity still holds. No bleqs, no Aztecs. Only one wohman.

Yet, their study on the benefits of DIEversity is world famous, but they don’t practice it themselves. It’s a farce, just virtue signaling.
 

Slim Whitman

Sparrow
Orthodox
Diversity is a luxury for those who already climbed to the top of the mountain and can afford to take some losses in order to virtue signal.
The United States didn't start inviting diversity until it had already built up all the infrastructure and was in a dominant economic position, then they needed automatons to flood in and help run the system they set up, at lower wages. Feminism, diversity, and multiculturalism are rarely present during the engineering and building phase, they are only added later when the fat & happy upper managers run out of real challenges. I suspect the McKinsey report reflects this in a sort of confirmation bias - companies that perform better added more diversity hires because they can afford the loss, whereas companies that aren't quite as profitable yet would be foolish to bring on affirmative action hires.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Pelican
Orthodox Inquirer

Snowflake CEO Says Diversity Goal Is Secondary in Hiring Choices​


Snowflake Inc. Chief Executive Officer Frank Slootman said the cloud software maker needs to focus more on merit when hiring and promoting employees rather than diversity goals, even as it takes steps to boost opportunities for workers.

This is funny though:

McKinsey & Co. that has found that companies with more diverse leadership are more likely to outperform the profitability of those that are the least diverse.

McKinsey found the most gender diverse companies were 25% more likely to have above-average profitability than the least gender diverse group. For ethnic diversity, the gap was 36%.

So I looked up McKinsey’s top leadership (Senior Partners).

View attachment 31298View attachment 31299
Looks like all white males except for one white woman and a china
''Snowflake CEO'' lol
 

Towgunner

Kingfisher
For today's daily White Pill, I think its important to underscore the utter disaster of leftist policies. I mean its a catastrophe. As we all know cities are the most infected places by leftism. And so, let's look at our cities. SFO, Chicago, New York etc, these places are complete disasters. They weren't always disasters, in fact, most of my life these cities flourished. This makes it easy to trace the cause and the cause is their leftist politics.

Elsewhere, biden, which we're supposed to believe was the most popular president elected ever, is failing so much its as though he's actually trying. Of course, that's not exactly the case, because, old joe is senile. We're staring at massive inflation, likely to be hyperinflation, and one damming revelation after the next, i.e. Fauci emails etc. Plus, "they" stole that election.

We've seen the left fail before, but, I wonder if we've seen it fail this spectacularly in recent years. Let's qualify that some more. Because, in my lifetime I saw the dissolution of the Soviet Union, so, that's a tough comp to beat. What of just the US? Up until recently, we haven't really been all that socialistic. Now we are and in short order, things are already breaking down and breaking down fast.

And then you have censorship. Censorship is an act of desperation. It's an admission that you lost the argument. After all, if you could win the argument then you wouldn't have to censor. What do we see from the left? Censorship and censorship at a scale never before seen in the free western world.

CRT and other forms of indoctrination are quickly infesting our education system, which has long since been infected by leftism in general. Here again, this system has failed, period. And, with each day there's another item that reveals the real intentions and output of this ideology. Be it a Yale professor saying she wants to kill white people or an Amazon delivery person beating on a white woman for being white.

Very soon, conservatives are going to get smart and institute what should have been done years ago, which is a critique of this leftist system, ideology...etc. All of this and more only makes this critique that much easier. It's like they're playing right into our hands.
 

Dusty

Peacock
Gold Member

Snowflake CEO Says Diversity Goal Is Secondary in Hiring Choices​


Snowflake Inc. Chief Executive Officer Frank Slootman said the cloud software maker needs to focus more on merit when hiring and promoting employees rather than diversity goals, even as it takes steps to boost opportunities for workers.

This is funny though:

McKinsey & Co. that has found that companies with more diverse leadership are more likely to outperform the profitability of those that are the least diverse.

McKinsey found the most gender diverse companies were 25% more likely to have above-average profitability than the least gender diverse group. For ethnic diversity, the gap was 36%.

So I looked up McKinsey’s top leadership (Senior Partners).

View attachment 31298View attachment 31299
Looks like all white males except for one white woman and a chinaman.
This study shows that the often regurgitated McKinsey study that DIEversity = profits, is a bunch of bunk.


In a series of influential studies, McKinsey (2015, 2018, 2020) report a statistically significant positive relation between the industry-adjusted EBIT margin of global samples of large public firms and the racial/ethnic diversity of their executives. However, when we revisit McKinsey’s tests using recent data for US S&P 500® firms, we find statistically insignificant relations between McKinsey’s inverse normalized Herfindahl-Hirschman measures of executive racial/ethnic diversity and not only industry-adjusted EBIT margin, but also industry-adjusted sales growth, gross margin, ROA, ROE, and TSR. Our results suggest that despite the imprimatur often given to McKinsey’s (2015, 2018, 2020) studies, caution is warranted in relying on their findings to support the view that US publicly traded firms can deliver improved financial performance if they increase the racial/ethnic diversity of their executives.
 
Top