Rand Paul is the only hope. Obviously people are trying to undermine him like they did his father. But Ron Paul has laid the foundation for his son to be a serious candidate. In fact I don't understand why even here he is not talked about.
Your Hillary 2016 Survival Plan
- Thread starter Blunt
- Start date
- Status
The feminazi Hillary Clinton will be the next United States president.
Can we do anything for this nightmare not to come true ?
Can we do anything for this nightmare not to come true ?
Slim Shady said:
Rand Paul is nothing like his father. His con-game is to make folks think he is 'Ronnie-Lite' but his track record, flip-flopping, and posting is all pandering and woven in establishment views. Him being a "serious choice" proves all of that. You don't run for either of the two parties unless you support establishment views.
Ron Paul never had a chance for the Republican ticket, but would of cleaned house as a Independent.
kosko said:
Rand Paul is the closest thing to Ron Paul. He has his father's ideologies while trying to be as electable as possible. Someone radical like Ron would never get elected, you have to pander to all sides and then make change when you're sitting in the oval office.
Rand is the closest thing we'll get to some kind of change.
I think we're all doomed if Hillary becomes president. But not because of the nanny dictatorship, witch-hunting (hunting by witches this time), and oppression she will bring to men.
I think she'll end up frying the world. She'll be so determined to show how tough a woman leader is she'll miscalculate in some dispute with Russia or China and start World War III. That, and all the post-menopausal rage. She'll launch the missiles just to get back at Bill, Monica and Gennifer Flowers.
I think of this in the context of the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. JFK was surrounded by generals, admirals, congressmen, and advisors telling him to be aggressive, to invade Cuba. But whatever his faults, JFK was a confident man who was secure in his own skin and had been in combat. He was cool. He resisted the pressure to "get tough" and worked out a deal which not only removed the missiles from Cuba but did so in a way which made the USA look good (unnecessary U.S. Jupiter missiles were also removed from Turkey, but this was not mentioned at the time).
Hillary would probably have attacked out of fear of looking weak. We now know the Russians already had nuclear missiles in Cuba, and the local commanders had the ability to launch them. It would not have ended well.
I think she'll end up frying the world. She'll be so determined to show how tough a woman leader is she'll miscalculate in some dispute with Russia or China and start World War III. That, and all the post-menopausal rage. She'll launch the missiles just to get back at Bill, Monica and Gennifer Flowers.
I think of this in the context of the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. JFK was surrounded by generals, admirals, congressmen, and advisors telling him to be aggressive, to invade Cuba. But whatever his faults, JFK was a confident man who was secure in his own skin and had been in combat. He was cool. He resisted the pressure to "get tough" and worked out a deal which not only removed the missiles from Cuba but did so in a way which made the USA look good (unnecessary U.S. Jupiter missiles were also removed from Turkey, but this was not mentioned at the time).
Hillary would probably have attacked out of fear of looking weak. We now know the Russians already had nuclear missiles in Cuba, and the local commanders had the ability to launch them. It would not have ended well.
Slim Shady said:
Rand Paul would be the very first President if elected that I will brag that I voted for him while he's in office, and I've been old enough to vote since 2003. I don't see him being isolationist as he's trying to sell himself (he's a huge supporter of Israel) but I think he'll think things through before he jumps into international conflict willy nilly unlike Bush.
Ben Carson is also considering a run. Should be interesting if he wins the primary too: will Black America back the brotha with an "R" next to his name? I think if Cain jumps into the race the GOP race will be stacked.
I see Christie and Perry as establishment candidates; the same crap we had with McCain and Romney.
aSimpNamedBrokeback
Kingfisher
MdWanderer said:
Will this brotha pander and parrot the same talking points as every R brotha before him?
Hedonistic Traveler
Woodpecker
Politico is dropping some knowledge today. Always nice to see the Dems getting called out on their bullshit, most of the comments on it are supportive too. The "War on Women" is a total farce, but it's an effective one. It's extra loud right now because the Dems are expecting a repeat of 2010 elections where the lost congress.
Probably my favorite quote..."This is all so silly that it is especially off-key in current circumstances. The implied Democrat message is that, yes, the president is broadly unpopular, the economy is middling and the world is falling apart — but someone called me “ma’am”!"
Can't win on real issues so you focus on the bullshit. Not that the Republicans are better. Either way I don't see Hillary Clinton winning in 2016. Even liberals don't like her, and as the initial frontrunner she'll be torn to shreds over the next two years.
Probably my favorite quote..."This is all so silly that it is especially off-key in current circumstances. The implied Democrat message is that, yes, the president is broadly unpopular, the economy is middling and the world is falling apart — but someone called me “ma’am”!"
Can't win on real issues so you focus on the bullshit. Not that the Republicans are better. Either way I don't see Hillary Clinton winning in 2016. Even liberals don't like her, and as the initial frontrunner she'll be torn to shreds over the next two years.
Sp5 said:
I think you are right, that her insecurities and overall lack of intelligence will be a detriment, but not in the same way.
I don't think there is any chance in hell that she would ever be allowed to get into a major military showdown. of any kind. There are legions of policy makers, arms manufacturers, political advisors, and Goddam smart military men who know that any kind of a military showdown that could possibly involve a nuclear threat is lunacy. I don't even think they would tell someone as hotheaded as Hillary where the fucking button even is. They would probably just tell her it didn't exist and if she wanted to use nuclear force she would first have to recite her multiplications tables through 12 x 12. That would be enough to illicit a deer in the headlights response.
But how Hillary would hurt us all is her terrible decision making. The only skills that she is good at are assessing blame, judging loyalty, and punishing her enemies. But tell Hillary to pick a new Secretary of Education, and she is going to pick the person who has the most ivy league credentials, who the public will approve of the most, and who is the most subserviant to any whim that Hillary wants.
Ideas? Results? Ingenuity? Those concepts will have no part in her decision making process. She could give a fuck less about what is actually the moral good, she is only concerned about who is going to pat her on the back when things go wrong.
And they will. Because the idea of doling out favors and rewarding those of whom she likes IS the reason Hillary wants so desperately to be president; not because she has any intention of creating a better tomorrow. For Hillary, the presidency is the ultimate, "we like you" award that the American public can give to her. And anyone who doesn't like her is going to be dealt with swiftly.
How long do you think Rush Limbaugh will last if Hillary is president? 1 year? 8 months? She will fucking change the Constitution just to silence the voice of anyone who mocks her. Watch. She is emotionally damaged in the worst way, and the only cure for her neurosis is power; and, the ability to hurt those who ridicule her.
It is going to be monstorously ugly. Especially if the U.S. economy continues to a cesspool of unecessary military spending and an underemployed population.
But fuck it. The U.S. population deserves it. Just like any addict that doesn't realize how low they have sunk, you have to hit rock bottom before any real change can take place. The good thing about Hillary is that the bottom is going to get here much sooner than later.
Cattle Rustler said:
Well of course these companies own both parties. They have their own special interests and are wise to try to buy their way. And in many cases it screws the rest of the country over. But this is an unfortunate fact we cannot get away from, at least not right now. Even if we elected an Independent, they will be told how it works or face the consequences.
Really the only thing we are voting on in this day and age is economic policy.
The Democrats are working hard to crush the middle class. Pushing more and more feminism to hamstring men into poverty. Obamacare crushing small businesses and destroying the "land of opportunity" ideal of being able to start poor and work yourself up the ladder. Increased welfare for more dependence and thus more voter base for them.
The Republicans don't want the Govt. dependence as it hurts their chances. So they stand for a stronger middle class that isn't dependent upon the govt. 95%+ of this board is in the middle class. It is in our economic interest to have a stronger middle class.
Add to it, we want freedom from this rigged system, the only way to get there is to have financial freedom in life. And the Democrats no longer offer this at all.
So we have three choices...
Vote for the feminist Democrats so we can have a shitty socialist economy and are basically trapped in the USA due to poor economic conditions. And we haven't even addressed the national debt and what happens when we can no longer borrow money for all these welfare programs.
Vote for the semi-feminist Republicans, keep our heads down, noses to the grind stone, and work and save to get away from this shitty anti-male system.
Vote for an Independent. Most likely your vote is wasted because the big money wants two party system that is easier to control
Both parties suck. Both parties are corrupt. One is less worse for men.
I am already having strong nightmares about this next feminazi - USA president...
blacknwhitespade
Kingfisher
If Republicans lose again in '16, it's not the end of the world. Imagine all the Hillary fatigue on top of Obama fatigue. Meanwhile, GOP is in the wilderness. The country is so diverse, it's silly to still have only 2 parties, but if Republicans can pull more of the hispanic vote, they can win the presidency again. Bush and McCain were pulling large chunks of hispanics in the 90s/00s, but recent events and the minority appeal of Obama have interrupted that progress.
She slammed into the wall particularly hard:
Truth Teller
Ostrich
As I said probably 4 pages ago now, she's not getting the nomination. Everyone loves her until she's trying to get the nomination. The media will find another darling.
Truck said:
There is always a sect/faction of the USA Military brass that is down for War 24/7. Yes you have rational heads whom crunch numbers and right now America is in no position of a large scale war campaign against any target that isn't a bunch of ragtags in the sand dunes in Chad but once the plans are drawn up the POTUS really just has their hands tied.
Your overstating the actions and reaactions that a woman POTUS would do. A hamster is a hamster
- Status