I think it is a little myopic to think his commentry only applies to the Russia Soviets. It's applicable to all Communist Countries and I don't see you how say he got it wrong when we are experiencing the stages of Crisis discussed in his lectures. Replace the USSR with the CCP and globalists in America and you have the same conflicting power structure: American Nationalists vs foreign Communism with subverted politicians pushing internal destruction of their own countries for NeoLiberal Globalism.
I listened to his Tragedy and Hope and his commentary on Quigley as well as the Rand corporation. Both were good.
1) there are cries from those on the politics left to re-educate non liberals and white men for their "Privilege"
I agree that the world banking system is behind the various communist/globalist orders. I would agree that Bezmanov does not get into the JQ or the BIS to the degree I would like, but his audience was nowhere near as informed as we are now on the nature of the NWO. He did a good job in pushing the overton window into accepting the notion of psychological subversion and social engineering. What we know now about the Trilateral Commission/CFR/Bildaberg/Atlantic Council/Rockafeller Foundations ect.... regarding globalism, was not in the common vernacular among most normies. He described things that would be corroborated with thorough research by historians and educators such as Anthony Sutton (who did a much more specific discussion of how US backed interests promoted communism and globalism). Sutton is very much more specific about the ties between wall street and communism (Trotsky/Marx were both funded by American ((())) banking money) regardless, though I believe these two people to be correct, trying to redpill society as to this information is just not going to happen as by and large they are not intellectually willing to accept that information.The "Soviets" are losing badly in Russia, China and most of Eastern Europe, where these people have been inoculated against cultural marxism, they've been booted out from these places decades ago, and these people as a result have been thriving economically and socially ever since.
The "Soviets" home base is now in most western countries, in the wealthiest Blue cities, and the bankster rulers who are the head Soviets have forged an alliance with the minorities and baizuo whites in all of these countries.
Note that the Soviets have always been the bankster rulers. The head of the spy network that Berezmov was referring to through the height of the Cold War was Victor Rothschild, who was also the head of his clan and defacto hidden owner of the Bank of England.
This is the side of the story that Berezmov hid from his audience back in the 1980s, and this is why the current Berezmov videos boil down to a disinformation effort. They reveal in great detail the process of cultural subversion, but obfuscate from the right wing audience the real nature of those who are perpetrating this cultural marxism agenda; it's those darn "Soviets", or the "CCP"!
Jay Dyer is absolutely right about this, though he will not be as precise about the real nature of the beast he is describing. He has tried to steer clear from this in order to maintain his YT and social media revenue stream but like many right wing "moderates", he has still gotten the shaft.
The Bolsheviks were financed by Wall Street firms (Jacob Schiff I believe). They made a ton of money liquidating the Russian nobility's assets.
Anthony C Sutton explained that he believed that Wall Street funded Bolshevism for several reasons, but the two that were repeated and stuck out the most to me were that it their funding would be creating an economic power to compel US businesses to compete and invest in the MIL-IND complex and because communist states eventually always bankrupt themselves, and afterward the wholesale acquisitions of their assets is facilitated. (Think Jeffrey Sachs in Russia/Poland/Bolivia)
